Howdy Philip,
~~~
Saturday, May 10, 2014, 9:02:51 AM (USA 'Somewhere on-the-road time-zone'),
you wrote the message that appears below.
My reply appears here and/or interspersed within your message.
~~~
> GJim wrote:
>> What, then, of the divergence between W3C and WHATWG?
> There is W3C, and there is everybody else. WHATWG is nothing
> more than a member of "everybody else", no matter how great
> its finite-but-unbounded sense of self-importance.
> Philip Taylor
Thanks for that comforting answer. I hadn't even heard of WHATWG until a few
weeks ago - always referring to W3C for correct syntax.
I would edit your first sentence to read 'There is W3C, then Microsoft, and then
everyone else'. ;)
G'Jim c):{-
--
Custom book-boxes: http://www.wyomerc.com/bookboxes/bookboxes.html
Book repairs: http://www.wyomerc.com/bookrepair/bookrepairs.html
My photography: http://www.gjim.com
Savvy ponderable:
Trust everybody in the game, but always cut the cards.
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
