Le 15 juil. 2014 à 08:30, Chris Rockwell <ch...@chrisrockwell.com> a écrit :

> Thanks Jeff.  Unfortunately, overflow:hidden is required, otherwise the sub
> nav items are always visible (you may not have noticed because the color is
> white).  The goal is to have the menu transition height from 0 to X with
> css, so I can't use display: none -> display: block either.

In that case, why not add 'overflow: visible' to
.l-region--navigation nav > .menu:hover > li > ul

That “fixes” the issue on my side (Opera latest release build, based on 
Chrome/35). I’m not clear what is happening, though. It looks like Bink is 
miscalculating the width of the child ul.menu, although the computed value 
matches that of the parent li.

Something you may want to fix: add all the missing -webkit- prefixed flex** 
properties for the benefit of Safari. Also, on “.front .l-header”, your 
unprefixed linear-gradient uses the wrong syntax, it should use “TO top” (or 
rather “to bottom”), as in: 
background-image: linear-gradient(to bottom, #ffffff 0%, #ffffff 50%, rgba(255, 
255, 255, 0) 100%); 
or you can omit the direction keyword, as top-to-bottom is the default)

Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com




______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to