Tom Livingston wrote:
In a URL string like that, I personally would not look down on the dev for that.
We could debate this forever, Tom, and I suspect would never reach agreement. My position (with which you may well disagree) is that I look on it as being similar to a developer who elects to use (say) the Qt library in his/her work and then, when challenged that something does not work as it should, responds "It's a bug in Qt". If a developer elects to use something from without his/her control, then it is his/her responsibility to ensure that it /does/ work as intended (i.e., in this case, validates).
"A bad workman blames his tools; a good workman chooses the correct tools and therefore never needs to try to ascribe blame".
Philip Taylor ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
