Erik Visser wrote:
> Philip Taylor schreef op 22-05-15 om 10:28: > >> Given that the latter three add to exactly 100%, and ignoring rounding >> issues, in what circumstances (if any) would you expect them to exploit >> their floatability ? > > I am not a native English speaker. (guess you already noticed) > So to be sure. If i understand you correctly, you are asking: in what > way do i expect the content to adapt the screen size in a fluid way... > Correct? No. In simpler words, as the widths of the individual columns add to exactly 100%, it is not at all clear to me when one or more of those columns might appear /underneath/ another column rather than alongside (ignoring rounding issues). Talking about "adapting [to] the screen size" is too generic -- I was interested solely in why you have CSS that would potentially allow the columns to float, yet size them such that it is not clear in what situations (if any) that floatability might ever be exploited. ** Phil. ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
