Background-size: 100% auto, scales the background image smaller. If I
add to the element width:<width of the image> the size of the background
image is perfect, in other words, the exact results I want. Is it
recommended to add width, unless you are using a positioning for the
element ?
No other background-size method you suggested gives me the same results
as just using; width !
Karl DeSaulniers <mailto:k...@designdrumm.com>
Thursday, May 21, 2015 1:26 AM
Try one of these Chris.
background-size: 100% auto; //Full width proportionate height (gets
cut off by size of container)
background-size: 100% 100%; full width and height (stretchy)
background-size: auto 100%; //Full height proportional width (gets cut
off by size of container)
HTH,
Best,
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Crest Christopher <mailto:crestchristop...@gmail.com>
Thursday, May 21, 2015 1:22 AM
Background-size, or bg:cover won't cause a background graphic to be
the actual width of the graphic, instead {width} works, can this be
used on a background image ?
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
