If you specify any img width in the css then the html widths will have no effect. But beware that if you haven't specified any heights, then the html 'height' may cause havoc with your layout. In the css, even height:auto; is sufficient to overide the html.
Maybe 508 compliance requires image dimensions, I don't know, but if it doesn't then I don't see the point of adding width and height to the html. Regards, Peter ----- > On 14 Apr 2016, at 21:04, Tom Livingston <tom...@gmail.com> wrote: > > List, > > Somewhat CSS related, I have a question about image dimensions. After > checking a 508 compliance check, one thing flagged was not having width and > height for images hard coded in the html. For responsive purposes, I thought > it was best not to code your dimensions in the html and let css/responsive > images do their thing. Not so? > > -- > > Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic | > ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
