On Monday, July 11, 2016, Philippe Wittenbergh <e...@l-c-n.com> wrote:
> > > On Jul 12, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Tom Livingston <tom...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > While Philippe may well me right about Peter Gabriel singing the theme > song > > for this technique, I have used this method frequently, with a slight > > difference. I use: > > > > html{box-sizing: border-box;} > > *, *:before, *:after { box-sizing: inherit; } > > > > Possibly picked it up from here: > > > https://css-tricks.com/inheriting-box-sizing-probably-slightly-better-best-practice/ > > > > Though I can't put my finger on it right now, I have read where this > method > > isn't really as a performance hit as it may seem. > > It is not really the performance “hit” that I object to (modern browsers > can handle the universal selector perfectly fine, even in deeply nested > trees – still use in moderation…), it is the “inherit” value. > > (and I never have had the need to use such a construct myself… my aversion > to so-called ‘reset’ css thingies is well-known on this list) > > How did Peter Gabriel creep into the conversation? He sang the song "Sledgehammer" ;) > > Philippe > -- > Philippe Wittenbergh > http://l-c-n.com/ > > > > > > -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com #663399 ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/