I have no idea what this means or what it has to do with negative padding.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Crest Christopher <crestchristop...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the help guys; unfortunately due to a markup error on my part > sent to support. The company took me off their software beta list; not very > forgiving then again, there support in the past has been not the > friendliest. > > Tom Livingston > Wednesday, February 22, 2017 8:39 AM > https://www.w3.org/community/webed/wiki/The_CSS_layout_model_-_boxes_borders_margins_padding#When_margins_alone_aren.E2.80.99t_enough:_padding_properties > > > > Tom Livingston > Wednesday, February 22, 2017 8:37 AM > Negative padding is treated like 0 or none. In padding short hand, I > *think* it will negate the whole padding declaration. You could try > negative margin for the side in question instead. > -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com #663399 ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
