OK, lol, no point in using it now, but its a good practice to get into so that someday, I'll be kick ass.
Thanks all for the responses, shed a lot of light on my question. On Oct 20, 12:53 am, andrew23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > See:http://hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml > <quote> > Sending XHTML as text/html Considered Harmful > ====================================== > > The advantages of XHTML > ----------------------- > > When sent as application/xhtml+xml, XHTML has several advantages: > > 1. XHTML content will be able to be mixed-and-matched with content > from other well-known namespaces (in particular, MathML). This > is the main advantage for content authors. > > 2. Browsers will immediately catch well-formedness errors (though > other errors still won't be caught). > > 3. Tools interacting with XHTML documents are guaranteed a > well-formed document. > > However, none of these apply when an XHTML document is sent as > text/html, and since authors feel their pages should be readable on > the most popular Web browser, which does not support > application/xhtml+xml, there is basically no point in using XHTML at > the moment. > > Conclusion > ---------- > > There are few advantages to using XHTML if you are sending the > content > as text/html, and many disadvantages. > > </quote> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ -- You received this because you are subscribed to the "Design the Web with CSS" at Google groups. To post: [email protected] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
