You douche bag, who would employ a guy that peruses porn sites trying to get design ideas and cant fix a template in 4 months? The only piece of functionality or content that you have on the site is a form to capture some poor sucker's email address so you can sell it.
Holy smokes a whole $15 dollars (The amount you offered to pay) to fix your code! I might be able to get that DVD I have been saving up for! How insulting! Stick to your day job hustling tourists at 3-card monte or whatever other hustle you have. On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:41 PM, pkr <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jamie, > > Yeah I come to Google and post in a group thread that has 1200 > members. Boy I sure do know how to generate that traffic huh? > Elementary detective skills, Sherlock. > > Obviously you can tell that I've been trying to emulate that code... > but because I work (a job.. look it up), I don't have time to come on > here every day and harass people who are generally interested in > fixing an issue with their code. The people who responded to my > previous thread (you included) didn't help, and I even offered to pay > to have it fixed. > > Get out of here with your erroneous statements. > > On Jan 13, 8:39 am, "Jamie C." <[email protected]> wrote: > > 4 months to fix a template problem that hasn't made any progress since > the > > last thread and you have a link to some porn site, which is what you are > > obviously promoting. Whatever dude. This group provided you with the > > knowledge to fix the problem and you made no effort. > > > > It's called a red herring... look it up. > > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:28 AM, pkr <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Jamie, > > > > > I don't know what seems "suspect" about not finding a solution to a > > > problem. I am definitely "serious" about fixing this issue. It's been > > > 4 months and I still haven't figured it out. Don't know how much more > > > convincing you need from me to persuade you that I want to fix it. > > > > > On Jan 13, 6:44 am, "Jamie C." <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > You posted this same thread back in September here: > > > > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/css-design/browse_thread/thread/48a308... > > > > > > You might want to continue it there if you are "serious" about fixing > the > > > > problem. > > > > > > Seems suspect to me. > > > > > > Jamie > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:56 AM, pkr <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > I've been trying to emulate an effect that I saw onwww.abum.com > > > > > (*warning* content is NSFW)... where in the "Featured Media" > section, > > > > > there are four thumbnails. Upon hovering over each, you will be > able > > > > > to see that the description changes... I'm trying to achieve this > > > > > effect with CSS, although some people said javascript would be > easier. > > > > > I'd like to use CSS to avoid unnecessary load time, but if > javascript > > > > > is the way to go, please show me the light! > > > > > > > It seems I am on the right path, although it isn't displaying how > I'd > > > > > like... you can see the page in question at: > http://tinyurl.com/8f9dkf > > > > > > > This is the code that I am using to achieve what I have so far, but > as > > > > > you can see, it is a little off from where I'd like it to be. > > > > > > > CODE: > > > > > #recommended a:link span, a:visited span { > > > > > display: none; > > > > > border: 0; > > > > > } > > > > > #recommended a:hover span, a:active span { > > > > > display: inline; > > > > > border: 0; > > > > > } > > > > > > > Anyone have any idea why this is happening? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ -- You received this because you are subscribed to the "Design the Web with CSS" at Google groups. To post: [email protected] To unsubscribe: [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
