I read somewhere to keep images down to at least 12kb each. That's a general rule I try to follow.
Here's a snippet from the link below: "beware of using large, fat images as your background. After you add the background image, check your page download time using the Load Time Check feature of HTML Toolbox. It will alert you to slow-loading pages that may drive visitors away from your site. " http://www.netmechanic.com/news/vol5/css_no23.htm On Dec 24, 8:48 pm, Philliam Auriemma <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey guys, > I have just started learning CSS and I was wondering, which is more > efficient and faster: to have one tiny image that can be repeated many > times, like a one pixel wide slice of an image that is repeated along > the x axis to make a bar across the page, or is it better to have an > image that is bigger, but doesn't need to be repeated as many times? -- -- You received this because you are subscribed to the "Design the Web with CSS" at Google groups. To post: [email protected] To unsubscribe: [email protected]
