On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenb...@linbit.com> wrote: > [we have volunteers for implementing SSH mode for csync2]
Do you mean me, or are you saying someone else has separately volunteered? (Just want to make sure I understand correctly.) > Guys, absolutely! > > (I did not yet read carefully, so I cannot comment in detail, > a bit swamped right now; as usual) Let me summarize: I would like to separate policy (e.g. enforcing hostnames and reverse IP resolution) from mechanism (synchronizing files). I would like the option to use SSH for my policy and csync2 only for mechanism. > I did quite some work recently on csync2, > as the current git head was a bit of a mess :( > > That even includes a "prove of concept" test suite! > > Should be ready to push that this week. Looking forward to seeing it; if I do any work in the meantime I'll of course do it against master, not your review branch. Thanks! _______________________________________________ Csync2 mailing list Csync2@lists.linbit.com http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/csync2
