On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 12:22:31PM +0300, bes wrote: > In our network we use 1.34 with actions where bash alias wrap around csync2 > and clean sqlite's table with actions at all hosts throught ssh and then > normaly run csync2. > I was think that 2.0 fix this and now i am confused
I have no idea what you guys are talking about. > On Oct 10, 2014 8:45 PM, "Łukasz Wąsikowski" <luk...@wasikowski.net> wrote: > > > W dniu 2014-10-10 o 16:15, Lars Ellenberg pisze: > > > > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 02:18:03PM +0000, Buchanan, Scott wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> My team is setting up csync2 on a small cluster, and I noticed there's a > > >> RC for v2.0, but that was from last year without any recent commits or > > >> updates. Has that been abandoned, or do you still plan to release it at > > >> some point? > > > > > > I don't remember any complaints. Not sure what was keeping me from > > > tagging it a "release" as apposed to "candidate", iirc there had been > > > some build/packaging issues on some "platforms". > > > > > > If I find the time to remember what was missing, > > > I'll clean it up and call it "release". > > > Meanwhile, just use it as is, > > > and report issues you are having here. > > > > I wanted to use actions, with 1.34 it was bugged - sometimes actions > > ended without errors and wasn't removed from active queue. It was fixed > > in 2.0, but 2.0 (at least 4c8bf2e2de9f21c6f2ad2d93851119ee16edd74a > > version) had another bug with actions (don't remember what was it though). _______________________________________________ Csync2 mailing list Csync2@lists.linbit.com http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/csync2
