Hi Steve, On Jul 23, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Steven Bethard wrote:
> On Jul 23, 2012, at 9:53 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: >> 2. Getting the 2.6 codebase for cTAKES in SVN ASAP and seriously considering >> making the 2.6 release *here* at the ASF. >> What is the problem with doing that? Are you concerned that it will add >> extra time? > > I believe that's at least one of the concerns - wouldn't we at least need to > change all package names to org.apache.ctakes before the first Apache release? That's not *absolutely* required, and it's more preferable to at least release at the ASF keeping the old package names, than to release outside. Besides that though, isn't changing the package names something that could be easily scripted? We did so for Apache OODT within a matter of a few days during Incubation with some Perl and Python scripting. > > Steve > > P.S. Having only become a cTAKES committer recently, I can't answer most of > your other questions. No worries thanks for trying to answer what you knew. Cheers, Chris ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
