I see there was an INFRA JIRA issue opened for creating a cwiki but then
closed until we decide if we really want to go with Confluence.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5185
I'm not sure I follow how INFRA-5185's description of having export
turned off in December will affect us.
I was assuming we would not export anything from an apache-hosted wiki
to anywhere else.
Did I misunderstand the point raised in INFRA-5185 or was someone
planning to export out of an apache-hosted wiki
I'm not a fan of the look of and the navigation through Confluence
pages. And I like the idea of flat files that moin uses rather than a
database but I'm no wiki engine expert.
I therefore suggest we go with moin.
-- James
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]
]
On Behalf Of Bleeker, Troy C.
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 1:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Apache Confluence wiki for documentation?
I was looking at the cTAKES issues and comments about the SVN load.
Too
bad they seem to be dragging their feet, but if you think about the
amount
of time cTAKES has been under development, waiting for what seems like
a
long time now will pay off for years. I digress.
This made me think about the documentation again. I was wondering if
we
had placed the request to Apache to create our Confluence? If not then
I
wonder if that can get kicked off too?
Pei, is that something you would do? I don't think I can since we are
still waiting on our corporate CLA.
Thanks
Troy
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]
] On Behalf Of Chen, Pei
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 11:11 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Apache Confluence wiki for documentation?
Good point on the getting started page. Added a "Getting Started"
section within General:
http://ctakes.staging.apache.org/ctakes/
Since Apache provides the infrastructure (SVN, Wiki, Jira, Compile
Servers, Continuous Integration, etc.), I think it would be nice to
have
things in a single place and managed by a single infrastructure. We
also
seem to have documentation on SF, Wikipedia, NCI, Mayo wiki; it would
be a
good opportunity to consolidate (Even it just means, migrating content
from existing sources.)
Troy: Do you have your Apache ID created? Would be great if someone
had
experience with this help us out in this area...
--Pei
-----Original Message-----
From: Bleeker, Troy C. [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 11:46 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Apache Confluence wiki for documentation?
When someone first approaches cTAKES it is hard to understand just the
list of components. The current site starts with an overview and then
branches into each of the releases. Would the cTAKES Apache site
(http://ctakes.staging.apache.org/ctakes/) be better served by a
Getting
Started link and then each of the releases?
When you say "request an wiki instance" what do you mean? cTAKES
already
has a wiki separate from Apache that is the existing supplement. Why
create a 3rd documentation location?
Thanks
Troy
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]
] On Behalf Of Chen, Pei
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 10:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Apache Confluence wiki for documentation?
Yes... That's what I'm thinking; either that or have a small blurb
about
each on the main CMS site and have a link to the wiki from there.
But either way, I'll request a wiki site for us to explore with.
--Pei
-----Original Message-----
From: Masanz, James J. [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 11:42 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Apache Confluence wiki for documentation?
+1 for Wiki
Those side nav links for cTAKES component documentation would then
link
to the Wiki, right?
-- James
-----Original Message-----
From: ctakes-dev-return-243-
[email protected]
[mailto:ctakes-dev-return-
[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chen,
Pei
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 10:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Apache Confluence wiki for documentation?
Added cTAKES components to the Side Nav for quick reference:
Staging Preview:
http://ctakes.staging.apache.org/ctakes/
Any objections of requesting an wiki instance for technical
documentation to
supplement the main Apache CMS site? I think it'll be easier to
edit/maintain
for technical documentation for each of the components...
CTAKES-7<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-7>
--Pei
