> The problem with general is that it often takes a bit until people vote there, > and if there is a problem you have to make a new RC which first needs to be > voted through here, and then again on general.
That sounds good. We can discuss here first and then vote on general once we have a consensus on ctakes-dev. > No, we can only include 3rd party work which falls withing category a or b > licenses. If that is not the case it cannot be included. I thought we would be able to release it while we were in incubation and making an effort to resolve it. Either case, I'll open a discussion to gauge the best approach on where to host the resources. > Another thing I noticed is that you uploaded the distribution files (src and > bin > package) to Nexus, usually people upload them to people.apache.org, > because they are not distributed via Nexus. I've been using the release:perform as suggested by http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html which automagically uploads all the project files to Nexus. Is there an easy way to omit the distribution project? Thanks, Pei > -----Original Message----- > From: Jörn Kottmann [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 4:50 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC1 > > On 10/30/2012 06:48 PM, Chen, Pei wrote: > > Thanks for the feed back Jorn. > > I'll rollback RC1 and will create a RC2 after the NOTICE and LICENSE > > updates. > > Yes, lets make a RC2 and get everything in a good shape. You need to vote > also on incubator general before you can release and the people there > usually do not like such things at all. > > The problem with general is that it often takes a bit until people vote there, > and if there is a problem you have to make a new RC which first needs to be > voted through here, and then again on general. > > Please cancel the vote here. > > >> Did you check if the UMLS Metathesaurus license is compatible with the > AL? > > Would it be acceptable if we revisit this one after the 3.0 release? > > It is currently being tracked here: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-53 > > It may take some time/effort to get confirmation from the NLM and move > around the resources (if required). > > > > > > No, we can only include 3rd party work which falls withing category a or b > licenses. If that is not the case it cannot be included. > > Have a look here: > http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#criteriaandcategories > > Well, the UMLS license is probably not listed there, in that case the guide > says: > > " ... Licenses not appearing on these lists must be explicitly approved by the > ASF Legal Affairs officer prior to distribution. License approval requests may > be sent to the legal-discuss mailing list." > > Another thing I noticed is that you uploaded the distribution files (src and > bin > package) to Nexus, usually people upload them to people.apache.org, > because they are not distributed via Nexus. > > The big distribution files should be distributed via Apaches distribution > infrastructure: > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#understandi > ng-distribution > > Jörn
