On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:14 PM, "Bleeker, Troy C." <[email protected]> wrote: > Now a question as well. When we went from cTAKES 1.0 to 1.2 we settled on > calling the parts of cTAKES one can take advantage of "component" as > evidenced by the diagram created and the documentation section headers, etc. > In the past month I've seen more people refer to the cTAKES parts as > "module". I'm not stuck on a name. Perhaps module is more of a maven term and > we didn't have that before. I have in mind what I like, but as I said it does > not really matter to me, so long as we are consistent. If we change away from > "component" the doc we pull over from previous releases will need to be > modified, also not too big a deal. What do you think?
I've been saying "module" only in specific reference to the Maven modules. I don't have any preference at all as to what we call the different parts of cTAKES in the documentation. (Except of course when we're literally talking about Maven modules, and there, of course, we should say "module".) Steve
