> Who has the authority to add these, as appears to have been agreed upon
> by everyone?  I am not clear on the process for managing the type system
> these days...
I would suggest the "Apache way" here? : Open a Jira, Discuss on ctakes-dev as 
appropriate (call a Vote if there are contentions), Commit the code.
Any committers should have access to make the changes to the code.

--Pei


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wu, Stephen T., Ph.D. [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 1:45 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: SHARPKnowtatorXMLReader
> 
> So back to the issue of the reading in Knowtator XML data...
> 
> I've been looking at your (Steve B's) code, and it seems like it's been 
> written
> so that everything hinges on Annotations subtypes being created for
> everything.  Are these type system barriers the main problems with
> connecting relations and attributes to their corresponding NEs?  (There is a
> layer that does not seem to be happening -- namely, that the values of NE
> attributes/relations don't get populated.  I don't fully understand the
> DelayedFeatures but assume that they would work if the types were set?)
> 
>   1. We haven't created the LabMention, ProcedureMention,
> AnatomicalSiteMention, DiseaseDisorderMention, and
> SignSymptomMention types that we had planned to, yet!  Or at least, they're
> not checked in.
> 
>   2. We also haven't created comprehensive Annotations for modifiers.
> 
> Who has the authority to add these, as appears to have been agreed upon
> by everyone?  I am not clear on the process for managing the type system
> these days...
>  - SHARP SDG (in original SHARP plans -- though I'm not a member)?
>  - Apache ctakes-dev (as most other stuff these days)?
>  - Me and James (what it's mostly been for the type system thus far)?
> 
> E.g., could Steve B. or anyone else on this list add them, esp. since they've
> been discussed?  I could do it too, but it seems like relation/attribute
> functionality in SHARPKnowtatorXMLReader has been held up a long time
> because we're confused about who can change the type system.
> 
> stephen

Reply via email to