One goal is to have a binary that contains all resources, which can be used to install cTAKES on a system that does not have an internet connection. For now we can focus on a first Apache release that doesn't meet that goal, while pursuing the question with legal. If legal says we can't do have that kind of binary here, then in the future we can consider if we will host such a binary on a different site.
Regards, James Masanz > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Chris Douglas > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 3:45 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Jörn Kottmann <[email protected]> > wrote: > > No, the OpenNLP did not have any discussion about it with legal. We > > just came to the conclusion that its not worth spending time on these > > issues, when we can instead produce our own training data which is > > compatible with the Apache license. > > Understood. Are the compatible training data synthetic? Would you > recommend a similar course here? > > James, is there a reason the models need to be distributed through Apache? > Your time is your own, but going through legal could delay your release. - > C > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
