Hi, On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <[email protected]> wrote: > Just to clarify -- that's Benson, talking for Roy. :) I realize that this > has got all skitzo lately, but just pointing out that this is far from > doctrine. Apache OpenOffice is a prime counter example to his point and I > just made that point myself.
+1 Apache hosts various different kinds of binaries as a convenience for users. The main requirements for such binaries are that they're properly documented (licensing metadata, etc.) and signed, only contain components that meet the Apache licensing policies and come from a trusted member of the community (as there's no easy way to verify the contents of a binary). So far the only reason I've seen that could preclude cTAKES from making such binaries available on www.apache.org/dist is the licensing status of some the contained models. Having resolved LEGAL issues on those would take care of that concern. BR, Jukka Zitting
