There shouldn't be a technical issue with adding it to the bin dist; pending the results of the LEGAL-157.
It's also available in maven central with auto download in mind. But, there are still some technical issues such as models inside jars within a dependency jar and lucene reading within a dependency jar; I could not get all of the different eclipse ide plugin's to properly unpack it. --Pei > -----Original Message----- > From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 7:30 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] no binary release of cTAKES here at Apache? FW: > [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release > > Hey Pei, and James, > > One option might be to just use Maven Antrun or something and add that as > a last step on the install phase or something, or pre assembly. That way it's > done to the user "automatically", and it still looks like this happened > through > Maven? > > Just a thought. > > Cheers, > Chris > > > On 1/29/13 7:05 PM, "Chen, Pei" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >James, > >I removed the models and bins from src from the 3.0.0 branch. Before > >we create RC6 (I'll try and do it by this Fri), would you or anyone > >else mind verifying? > >There will be one additional step for developers and users: > >One would need to download and unpack the resources.zip and add it to > >their classpath. > >https://sourceforge.net/projects/ctakesresources/files/ctakes-resources- > 3. > >0.1.zip > > > >-Even though it's uploaded to maven central as well, I think it's > >easier to ask users to just unpack and add it to their classpath. > >-Everything is in a single zip (umls,lvg,models) for simplicity. Users > >can always just ignore what they do not need. > > > >--Pei > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Masanz, James J. [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 1:41 AM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] no binary release of cTAKES here at Apache? FW: > >> [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release > >> > >> > >> thanks, that was not clear to me. It's good news. > >> > >> -- James > >> ________________________________________ > >> From: ctakes-dev-return-1119- > >> [email protected] [ctakes-dev-return- > 1119- > >> [email protected]] on behalf of Jukka > >> Zitting [[email protected]] > >> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 12:37 AM > >> To: ctakes-dev > >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] no binary release of cTAKES here at Apache? FW: > >> [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Masanz, James J. > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Yes, that's the way I reading Roy's post - that it can't include > >> > models (intermediate outputs) because the source for those > >>intermediate > >> outputs is not being included. > >> > >> Note that this only applies to the *source* release, not to any > >>pre-compiled binaries you may want to ship along with a release. > >> > >> BR, > >> > >> Jukka Zitting
