Hi Pei,
   Thanks for your reply, Yes i meant that DrugAggregatePlaintextUMLSProcessor 
return more concepts, or the opposite AggregatePlaintextUMLSProcessor returns 
the usual concepts + the MedicationEventMentions. I don't think it is hard to 
implement, as i think the dictionary lookup code won't change.

I tried to merge the drug lookup in the lookupDB and add the drug annotator in 
the normal pipe line, but of course things are not that simple :) I don't fully 
understand how the dictionary look up works, otherwise i could do it. Maybe if 
you have sometime, you can guide me a little and i can go from there.

Thanks,
Shady

On Feb 4, 2013, at 6:58 PM, "Chen, Pei" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Shady,
> Just wanted to confirm:
> Did  you mean that the DrugAggregatePlaintextUMLSProcessor identifies the 
> same drugs, but just with more attributes (i.e. dosage, frequency, etc.)?
> Or did you mean that the DrugAggregatePlaintextUMLSProcessor actually 
> returned more UMLSConcepts (MedicationEventMentions) the regular 
> AggregatePlaintextUMLSProcessor?
> 
> For the former, there is an outstanding Jira item to combine the 2 (reusing 
> the existing lookup entries- rather than a second lookup): 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-20
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Shady Hussein [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 5:47 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Combining Drug and Concept annotations
>> 
>> Dear All,
>>   I discovered that cTAKES doesn't recognize all the medical entities as
>> concepts. There is a difference between using the normal UMLS dictionary in
>> "/cdpdesc/analysis_engine/AggregatePlaintextUMLSProcessor.xml" and
>> "/drugnerdesc/analysis_engine/DrugAggregatePlaintextUMLSProcessor.xml
>> ". The later can detect all the drugs, while the first can't.
>> 
>> My question now is how to combine between both of those dictionaries. So i
>> can detect all the drugs and concepts mentioned in the text. I would be
>> grateful if somebody can help me :)
>> 
>> --
>> Thanks and best Regards,
>> 
>> Shady AbdelAziz

Reply via email to