I made a few minor changes to the downloads page. But it should be automatic; 
the replication normally takes 24hrs. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 15, 2013, at 7:10 PM, "Masanz, James J." <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Hi Pei, 
> 
> Did you mean that you will update the downloads page once the artifacts hit 
> all of the mirrors or that they will be automatically updated some how?
> 
> 
> -- James Masanz
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ctakes-dev-return-1213-Masanz.James=mayo....@incubator.apache.org
>> [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1213-
>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Chen, Pei
>> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 11:23 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [DRAFT] [ANNOUNCE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0 incubating Released
>> 
>> Below is a draft of the announcement.  Open for feedback before we send
>> it out to [email protected] and general.
>> Note: the downloads page will be updated once the artifacts hit all of
>> the mirrors.
>> 
>> ----
>> 
>> The Apache cTAKES (Incubating) team is pleased to announce the
>> availability of the 3.0.0-incubating release.
>> 
>> Apache clinical Text Analysis and Knowledge Extraction System (cTAKES)
>> is an open-source natural language processing system for information
>> extraction from electronic medical record clinical free-text.
>> 
>> The release can be downloaded from:
>> http://incubator.apache.org/ctakes/downloads.html
>> 
>> For further information, please visit the project website at
>> http://incubator.apache.org/ctakes/
>> 
>> The Apache cTAKES Team
>> 
>> Disclaimer:
>> Apache cTAKES is an effort undergoing incubation at The Apache Software
>> Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the Apache Incubator. Incubation is
>> required of all newly accepted projects until a further review indicates
>> that the infrastructure, communications, and decision making process
>> have stabilized in a manner consistent with other successful ASF
>> projects.  While incubation status is not necessarily a reflection of
>> the completeness or stability of the code, it does indicate that the
>> project has yet to be fully endorsed by the ASF.
> 

Reply via email to