+1, I think this would make a lot of sense, and would appreciate hearing from the community on this.
Cheers, Chris On 3/7/13 8:07 AM, "Dligach, Dmitriy" <[email protected]> wrote: >Should we consider getting rid of the sourceforge version of cTAKES >completely to avoid confusing people who want to download cTAKES for the >first time? Depending on how you google it, the sourceforge version might >come up first. > >Dima > >Begin forwarded message: > >From: SourceForge.net<http://SourceForge.net> ><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected] >t>> >Date: March 6, 2013 9:35:41 PM EST >To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >Subject: SourceForge Project Upgrade - Code Repo Complete >Reply-To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > >Your code repository in upgraded project ohnlp is now ready for use. > >Old repository url: http://ohnlp.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/ohnlp > >New repository checkout command: svn checkout --username=dimdym >svn+ssh://[email protected]/p/ohnlp/code/trunk ohnlp-code > >You should do a checkout using the new repository location. The old >repository is read-only now. > >For more detailed instructions on migrating to your new repo, please see >https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/community-docs/Repository%20Upgrade%20FAQ/ > >-- >SourceForge.net<http://SourceForge.net> has sent this mailing to you as a >registered user of >the SourceForge.net<http://SourceForge.net> site to convey important >information regarding >your SourceForge.net<http://SourceForge.net> account or your use of >SourceForge.net<http://SourceForge.net> services. >If you have concerns about this mailing please contact our Support >team per: http://sourceforge.net/support >
