I agree. I think that makes sense and actually the original intention.
On Mar 20, 2013, at 10:48 AM, "Steven Bethard" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 20, 2013, at 8:16 AM, "Masanz, James J." <[email protected]> wrote: >> I was guessing we would have a separate set of tests that would be run when >> a RC was built that would test the pipelines that include the UMLS >> resources. But that the regression tests in ctakes-regression-test would at >> least ensure the other (non UMLS) parts of the pipelines worked. > > In relation extractor, we're already testing the non-aggregate descriptors in > the regular unit tests, so it's really only the aggregate descriptor with > UMLS resources that needs to be tested. > > BTW, I think this is probably what we should be doing in general - all > non-aggregate descriptors should be tested in unit tests, and the aggregate > descriptors can all be tested by CPE regression tests or something along > those lines. > > On Mar 20, 2013, at 8:39 AM, "Chen, Pei" <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I think it is def possible to auto download umls, unpack, tester provide >> credentials, run the tests. None of this gets distributed so I think it's >> possible. I could take a stab at this in a few weeks unless someone gives >> it a shot first. > > This would be great. I think I'll postpone my efforts to add a CPE test for > relation extractor until after this. > > Steve
