On 12/12/06, IanF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I came across some strange behavour re. the static intializers in
> JDK1.5 and cant find any reference to this in the api docs.
>
> the 'static' keyword become optional for static initializers.
>
> in JDK1.4
>
> static {
> ... do some static stuff...
> }
>
> in JDK 1.5 this seem perfectly valid ( even put breakpoint and stepped
> into)
>
> {
> ... do some static stuff...
> }
>
> Is this true or is there a different meaning to this???
>
>Naah...what you have there is NOT static initializer , but an instance initializer (Section 8.6 of the spec) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CTJUG Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/CTJUG-Forum For the ctjug home page see http://www.ctjug.org.za -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
