Hi, yup, EJB2.0. Well, the system for one, is relatively small and I just feel the bulk and complexity of EJB is quite an overkill. My philoshophy is to write any app in the lightest, fastest way while still preserving scalability and ease of maintenance. I dont dislike EJB per say, but I just feel I can get away without using EJB. Also, when I;m gone from here, they wont need someone with any special EJB or Spring experience to maintain the system. I can probably think of more reasons, but thats it for now :)
regards dudley On 1/17/08, William Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi > > Any specific reason why you dont want to use EJB? I presume it's version > 2.1? > I don't understand why people dislikes that spec so much... I for one > love it! > > On 1/17/08, Dudley Butt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Now heres a real challenge for you guys. I have a very big client who > has > > asked me to write a small Java app. However, their legacy systems > dictate > > that I have to use JDK1.3 and Weblogic6.1SP2. Ok, so after trawling > through > > the archives I found that Spring 208 and Struts1.1 will run on JDK1.3. > > Basically, > > they also trying to enforce the use of EJB, but I'm trying to dodge that > > bullet by using Springs JDBCTemplate. Anyone have any ideas of what > other > > technology stacks will work with JDK1.3? Come on guys, look far down > memory > > lane here :) This is going back a good couple years. > > > > regards > > dudley > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CTJUG Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/CTJUG-Forum For the ctjug home page see http://www.ctjug.org.za -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
