well actually 1.3.1 has been released

http://apache.is.co.za/wicket/1.3.1/

If you using Websphere Portal server, I believe your doomed anyway...sorry

On 2/4/08, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Chris
>
> Not sure which version you evaluated.
>
> But a feature of the latest version 1.3
>
>
>    - use your Wicket pages directly in a portal without changing a line
>    of code (JSR-168/JSR-286 support)
>
> Enjoy
> Jeff
>
> Christian Oloff wrote:
>
> I evaluated wicket a while ago intensively, basically with the goal to have 
> parts of a web user interface model-driven; you can browse through my little 
> project(s) and some examples at http://r8fe.net/webby.  IMHO, Wicket 
> abstracts nicely from the fact that web applications are stateless by nature 
> and it pulls all logic and many visual aspects of a web application into the 
> Java source, using a mature component model, making it much easier to check 
> validity and correctness of your software at compile time. This feels 
> structurally superior to JSF and similar technologies.  A downside is that 
> wicket doesn't support a portal environment (yet), so with tears in my eyes I 
> had to rebuff it for my current project, which needs portlets.  Hope this 
> helps a little, if you've got more questions, let me know.  Cheers, Chris  On 
> Mon, 2008-02-04 at 12:00 +0200, Brian Silberbauer wrote:
>
> Matt Riable has an interesting paper where he asks framework developers 
> various questions:  
> http://www.virtuas.com/articles/webframework-sweetspots.html  The usual 
> suspects are there including wicket and RIFE, which I'd never heard of.  
> Brian   On Feb 4, 2008 10:57 AM, Enrico Goosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Hi,    Is anyone currently using the Wicket web framework?  I rewrote the 
> CTJUG/jobsite using Appfuse and JSF, but I must admit, I'm not that impressed 
> with JSF.    I've been reading some blogs on dzone, and it seems like Wicket 
> is gaining traction, and getting a lot of good reviews.  So I'm just 
> wondering if any CTJUG members are also using it?  Pros/Cons?    Regards,    
> Enrico Goosen  Software Developer  Metropolitan Employee Benefits  Email: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Direct:  021 940 6231  Fax:      021 917 3089  Mobile:  
> 083 305 5676     "NOTE: This message (including attachments) is subject to 
> all the restrictions, qualifications and disclaimers of the Metropolitan 
> group of companies ("Metropolitan") published at 
> http://www.metropolitan.co.za (collectively the "disclaimers") and by reading 
> this message and/or opening any attachment you are deemed to have agreed to 
> be bound by the provisions of the disclaimers. If you cannot access any of 
> the disclaimers, kindly send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or contact [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED] and a copy will be sent to you.   Metropolitan is an authorised 
> Financial Services Provider.   Web: http://www.metropolitan.co.za/  
> Disclaimer: http://www.metropolitan.co.za/email_disclaimer.html    
> Metropolitan subscribes to KPMG, a completely independent crime disclosure 
> service - make a contribution to the establishment of a fraud free 
> environment by reporting any suspicion to the KPMG Hotline  * RSA 0800 22 14 
> 18 * NAMIBIA 0800 00 00 77"    >
>
>
>
> >
>


-- 
If you have something tough, give it to the Americans. If you have something
difficult, give it to the Indians. If you have something impossible, give it
to the Russians

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CTJUG Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/CTJUG-Forum
For the ctjug home page see http://www.ctjug.org.za
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to