>From Edupage:

***************

APPEALS COURT UPHOLDS ANTI-SPAM LAW
Commercial e-mails, or spam, must contain valid return addresses
and other identifiers that make it easier for consumers to remove
themselves from mailing lists, according to a ruling upheld
recently by a California appeals court. The defendants in that
case, two Palo Alto-based companies, had argued that the previous
ruling violated the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Because Congress has yet to settle on any comprehensive anti-spam
law, consumers must rely on state law. But that could result in
a hodgepodge of restrictions on legitimate Web-based businesses.
The California ruling requires that commercial e-mailers also
mark their messages with an "ADV:" in the subject heading, and
a special "ADV:ADLT" for messages linked to adult content. The
Supreme Court in October refused to hear a challenge to a
Washington state law that stringently regulates spam in that
state.
(Cnet, 7 January 2002)

*************

Christine Peterson
Library Liaison Officer, Amigos Library Services
14400 Midway Road, Dallas, TX  75244-3509
800/843-8482 x191 (message only)
512/671-1580 (phone and fax)
EMAIL:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Include in body: unsubscribe ctls-l

For information on CTLS-L please visit:
http://www.ctls.net/document/ctls-l.htm

Reply via email to