>From PUBLIB:

 

Message: 8

Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:29:14 -0800

From: Diedre Conkling <[email protected]>

Subject: [Publib] Fwd: [District Dispatch] ALA Files Comments,    Urges

      CPSC To Exempt    Libraries from Regulation Under Consumer Product

      Safety Act

To: [email protected]

 

 http://www.wo.ala.org/districtdispatch/?p=1621

 

 

 ALA Files Comments, Urges CPSC To Exempt Libraries from Regulation
Under Consumer Product Safety Act
<http://www.wo.ala.org/districtdispatch/?p=1621>

January 26th, 2009 | Category: Government
Information<http://www.wo.ala.org/districtdispatch/?cat=3>,

Grassroots Lobbying <http://www.wo.ala.org/districtdispatch/?cat=20>,

OGR<http://www.wo.ala.org/districtdispatch/?cat=17>

 

 WASHINGTON, D.C. - The American Library Association (ALA) today filed
comments with the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), urging the
commission to issue notification confirming that the new lead limits
under the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSIA) do not apply to library
books and related materials.

 

Under the CPSIA, which was passed by Congress in August, children's
products are required to undergo stringent testing for lead and
phthalates.

Currently, the General Counsel of the CPSC  is interpreting the law  to
apply to ordinary, paper-based books for children  12  years of age or
younger, so that all such books and product would have to be tested for
lead content.  Therefore, public, school, academic and museum libraries
would be required either to remove all their children's books or ban all
children under 12 from visiting the facilities as of February 10.

 

The ALA's comments explain that the new CPSIA standards applicable to
children's products should not apply to library books on library shelves
prior to February 10.  Since a library's books are neither "produced"
nor "distributed" by the library, the law should not apply to library
books.  At this point, however, the CPSC has indicated that the law will
apply to libraries.

 

Additionally, the ALA's comments reaffirm the comprehensive evidentiary
support the publishing community has supplied the Commission that
children's books do not present any of the health or safety risks to
children that the law aims to address.  This evidence provides an ample
basis for CPSC to exercise its regulatory authority to determine that
books inherently satisfy the new lead standards.

 

Emily Sheketoff, executive director of the ALA Washington Office, said
it is critical the CPSC take these comments into consideration.

 

"If the commission does not correct their ruling to include library
books under the regulation of the Consumer Product Safety Act,
communities and schools across the country are going to be shocked and
outraged on February 10," Sheketoff said.

 

"While we understand the process the CPSC must carry out in order to
ensure this law is properly enforced and that the safety of our nation's
children is protected, we believe the commission is wasting time and
resources by zeroing in on book publishers and libraries. It is our hope
that this matter will be resolved soon, so that libraries can continue
their efforts to serve children without the threat of closing their
doors."

 

The ALA's letter to the CPSC can be viewed here

<http://www.wo.ala.org/districtdispatch/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/ala_c
omments.pdf>
<http://www.wo.ala.org/districtdispatch/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/ala_c
omments.pdf%3e> 

.

 

 

--

Diedre Conkling

[email protected]

 

 

Laurie Mahaffey, Deputy Director

Central Texas Library System, Inc.

1005 West 41st Street

Austin, Texas 78756

www.ctls.net

[email protected]

512-583-0704 x18

800-262-4431 x18

 

 

Reply via email to