-Caveat Lector-
-------- forwarded message --------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LaRouche Issues Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998
Subj: Al Gore or Adolph Hitler
Seasons greetings to all LaRouche Issues Mailing List subscribers
and in the tradition of Washingtons victory at Trenton which
occurred on Christmas Day, here is the article "Al Gore or Adolph
Hitler" which should wake up all sleeping soldiers and mobilize
them to a similar victory.
The EIR Talks Audio which will be on the web site soon are excerpts
from Helga Zepp-LaRouche's speech to the Labor Day Conference of
the Schiller Institute/ICLC.
Al Gore and Adolf Hitler
by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.
December 22, 1998
The currently ongoing coup d'etat, aimed to bring Vice-President
Al Gore quickly into the U.S. Presidency, was proposed publicly, by
former U.S. Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger, in the October
15 London {Daily Telegraph}. More recently, in the December 15
edition of the {Wall Street Journal}, former Nixon aide Clay T.
Whitehead, described that type of secret committee which Kissinger
was proposing for a Gore coup d'etat, as it had operated inside the
Nixon administration. This was, in fact, the so-called "Watergate"
operation which Kissinger coordinated under Vice-President Ford.
Whitehead's version of Kissinger's proposals, then and now,
coincides exactly with a series of coordinated actions, which have
been operating within the Clinton Administration, largely behind
President Clinton's back. These operations, centered around
Vice-President Al Gore, have been pushed as a plan of action for
preparing the ouster of the President.
Neither of these two insider "secret committees," neither that
which operated against Nixon under Kissinger, nor the not-so-secret
"national security" cabal now aligned against Clinton, behind Gore,
is really original. As the writer Plutarch would have described
it, there is an ominous parallel between the presently attempted
coup d'etat against President Clinton, and the way in which the
government of Germany's Chancellor Kurt von Schleicher was
overthrown, on January 28, 1933, by Hjalmar Schacht and London-
backed forces inside the German parliament, to hustle Adolf Hitler
into power.
To see the connection clearly, first consider crucial highlights of
the process through which a then-otherwise unelectable candidate
Hitler was brought into the Chancellorship, on January 30, 1933,
and to dictatorial power on February 28, less than one month later.
The same London-centered, Anglo-American financier interests,
now represented by Prime Minister Tony Blair, which brought the
then-virtually unelectable Hitler to power in Germany, are behind
the use of a rabid Anglophile, the virtually unelectable
Presidential candidate Al Gore, in the effort to run a
parliamentary coup d'etat now, against Clinton, as against
von Schleicher earlier.
Both the motive and the method behind these coups d'etat are
so nearly identical, not only in astonishing fineness of certain
details, but in crucial strategic implications, as to scare the
pants off any U.S. citizen still capable of honest thinking.
It is time for us all to say, "Never again!" and let Al Gore serve
out the remainder of his term, in that quiet and obscurity which
our nation's security interest demands for him.
- Schacht and Hitler -
If we examine both matters in their crucial, political-economic
setting, there is a precise parallel between the British
Commonwealth-directed launching of the "Whitewatergate" targetting
of President Bill Clinton, by the failed re-election campaign of
President George Bush, during 1992, and the earlier process leading
to Hitler's legal coup d'etat of January 28-February 28, 1933.
The economic issues, in both cases, are defined most sharply, by
comparing the global crisis-developments which burst into the open
during October 1997, with the collapse of Germany's discredited
Social-Democratic government and party, in the aftermath of the
1929 U.S. stock-market panic.
The attempt of the Social-Democratic government to find a "Third
Way" between the German population and maddened international
bankers, led to the fall of that government, and an ensuing
succession of "ministerial" governments, from the British
government of Tony Blair "lookalike" Ramsay MacDonald, June 8,
1929, through President Hindenburg's appointment of Adolf Hitler
on January 30, 1933.
The key, London-directed figure of Germany throughout this period
was Brooklyn, N.Y.-born Hjalmar Horace Greeley Schacht, a life-long
asset of the J.P. Morgan interests, with direct control over
Schacht exerted by the Bank of England's Montagu Norman. This was
the same Norman who was a controller of the financial house of
Averell Harriman, during all of the relevant years leading up to
and beyond the Hitler coup d'etat. It was Schacht, deployed by
Norman, to bring the New York bankers into support for Hitler, who,
assisted by British intelligence services, organized the German
side of the Hitler coup d'etat against the government of Kurt von
Schleicher (and Hitler's later assassination of von Schleicher).
The Anglo-American financiers' immediate motive for bringing Hitler
to power, was the commitment of those London and New York bankers
behind Schacht, to prevent the implementation of an economic-
recovery policy designed by a brilliant key figure, Dr. Wilhelm
Lautenbach, of the pro-U.S.A. Friedrich List Society. Notably, the
Lautenbach plan, like the tradition of Friedrich List himself,
expressed the political-economic philosophy of the founders of the
U.S.A., and was the only policy, other than the like-minded
President Franklin Roosevelt's U.S. recovery policy, which could
have provided a democratic solution for what is known in most
history books as "The Great Depression." This Lautenbach plan,
which echoes the November 1989 recovery plan of Deutsche Bank's
assassinated Alfred Herrhausen, was the intended economic recovery
program for a von Schleicher government in Germany. It was
Norman's puppet Schacht, who deployed to New York, to mobilize
Wall Street support for a coup d'etat to bring Hitler immediately
into power in Germany.
Notably, Schacht motivated the coup d'etat, by libelling the
Lautenbach plan, and von Schleicher, as "Bolsheviks" who had to be
stopped, just as Gore's backers use the foolish Gore as their
spearhead for putting an "enemy image" on the faces of the
pro-national sovereignty governments of Mexico, China, Russia,
Malaysia, et al. Gore's deployment, on behalf of the British Duke
of Edinburgh's Transparency International, to classify defense of
national sovereignty as "corruption," shows the motive behind rabid
Anglophile Gore's bloody hand in the situation today.
In a situation similar to that of 1932-1933 Germany, today, the
only workable alternative for the presently ongoing disintegration
of the world's financial system, is the "New Bretton Woods" program
which I have introduced. With the full confirmation of my warning
of an October 1997 crisis, that "New Bretton Woods" orientation
went immediately onto a leading place on world's agenda. It met
resistance from the same species of sources (e.g., London's
neo-Thatcherite, neo-MacDonald Prime Minister Tony Blair), which
resisted the Lautenbach plan during 1931-1933. Essentially, it is
the same Anglo-American financier interests, who backed Hitler and
opposed Franklin Roosevelt, during 1933-1938, who are behind the
use of Al Gore as their cat's-paw today. The economic, strategic,
and social consequences of a Gore coup d'etat now, would be
similar to, but far worse than the outcome of the original Hitler
coup d'etat.
The result of that reaction, is the deployment of what Kissinger
and Clay T. Whitehead have described as a "secret committee"
organized to prepare for a coup d'etat against the U.S.
Constitution and its incumbent President, Bill Clinton.
It must be emphasized, again, that the strategic implications of
such an Anglo-American national-security posture, under presently
unfolding world economic, political, and social conditions, would,
if tolerated, ensure a far more devastating result than
Anglo-American bankers' unleashing of the 1933 Hitler coup.
- The flavor of 1932-1934 -
The chronology of the most crucial related developments in the
U.S.A., Britain, and Germany during 1929-1934, gives the flavor
of the situation -- then, and now.
The count-down to the Hitler coup d'etat began in Paris, with
the fateful prelude to the outbreak of the Great Depression,
the June 7, 1929 failure of the Young Plan to provide workable
alternatives for the looming international disaster posed by the
unresolved issues of Germany's war-reparations debt. The immediate
next shoe to drop, came in England, with the June 8, 1929 formation
of the second government of Labour Party Prime Minister (James)
Ramsay MacDonald. MacDonald's quasi-fascist government, which
remained in office until June 7, 1935, is the forerunner of today's
Blair regime. This was followed by not only the October 24, 1929
stock-market panic in New York, but also the November 9, 1932
election of "American Methods" spokesman Franklin Roosevelt as
President-elect of the U.S.A. Notably, Wall Street and London
adversary Roosevelt was, in economics, a co-thinker of the American
System political-economic policies of Germany's Wilhelm Lautenbach.
The Anglo-American bankers responded to this crisis of the Young
Plan's failure, by pulling down the Grand Coalition government of
Social-Democratic Chancellor Hermann Muller, on March 27, 1930.
The coup d'etat was set off by a rigged crisis in the German
government. The issue of the second reading of the doomed
Young Plan, was turned into a de facto coup d'etat by the abrupt
resignation, on March 7, of the British bankers' agent Hjalmar
Schacht from his position as president of Germany's central bank,
the Reichsbank. In the ensuing parliamentary crisis, the
Muller government collapsed on March 27, and the "Ramsay
MacDonald of Germany," the brutal Heinrich Bruning, was
installed on March 30.
From that point, until the London-run coup d'etat against the
von Schleicher government, thus bringing the otherwise unelectable
Hitler to power in January 30, 1933, Germany was ruled by a series
of four ministerial regimes, all of which, excepting the von
Schleicher government, were tools of Schacht and the de facto
Schacht-controlled Center Party.
That period, from 1928 through the September 12, 1932 collapse of
the von Papen government, saw a combined, sudden collapse in the
Social-Democratic vote for the national parliament, and a zooming
upward of the Nazi vote. However, with the progressive
self-discrediting of the Social-Democratic Party, the fall of the
von Papen government was echoed by a significant turn away from
the Nazi party, too. Schacht regarded the possibility of a coup
d'etat against von Schleicher, as London's last chance to keep
the Hitler option alive. London and Wall Street were alarmed by
the coincidence between Roosevelt's November 9, 1932 status as
President-elect of the U.S.A., and von Schleicher and Lautenbach's
American System economic policies coming into power in Germany.
So, the British, together with London's assets Morgan and Harriman,
joined London in deploying the parliamentary coup d'etat against
von Schleicher, and bringing Hitler into power.
- An ominous lesson for today -
There is another bitter lesson for today, to be learned from the
later events of 1933-1938. The immediate, foolish response to
Hitler's appointment as Chancellor, from the Communists,
Social-Democrats, and others, was, in effect, "Wait until the
Germans begin to see what Hitler is like; they will turn to us."
It did not work out that way. See the tempo of events leading
into Hitler's consolidation of dictatorial and strategic power.
Von Schleicher was ousted on January 28, 1933. Hitler was made
Chancellor on January 30. On the night of February 27, the
unprotected German parliament building, the Reichstag, was burned
down in an arson attack. That incident was used by the Nazi
government of Prussia, under Hermann Goring, to launch a wave
of terror against the political opponents and rivals of the Nazis.
The power of government by decree, under the terms of the so-called
{Notverordnung}, was activated, giving Hitler power of rule by
emergency decree. By April 7, the {Gleichschaltung} laws, Nazi
Propaganda Minister Josef Goebbels' echo of Prince Metternich's
1819 Carlsbad {Beschlusse} (decrees) were installed, coinciding
with the purging of Jews from influential positions in Prussian
society. The Nazi book-burning was launched on May 10.
Hitler's dictatorship was consolidated rapidly during the following
months. In the famous plebiscite of November 1933, the Nazi vote
reported was more than 96 percent of the total. The end to
effective resistance came in the Summer of 1934, approximately a
year and a half after Schacht's orchestration of the coup d'etat
against the von Schleicher government. This consolidation of
Hitler's personal power as a dictator, came in three developments:
1. The "night of the long knives," the so-called Rohm purge,
which eliminated not only potential challengers to Hitler from
within the populist-based "brown shirts" of his own party, but also
provided the occasion to assassinate a key target of Schacht's
hatred, former German Chancellor and General Kurt von Schleicher.
2. The convenient death, on Aug. 2, of President Paul von
Hindenburg.
3. Hitler's use of the occasion of President Hindenburg's death to
supersede the elective position of President by Hitler's perpetual
personal authority as {Fuhrer}.
Thus, on August 19, 1934, Hitler's dictatorship was consolidated.
By the close of 1938, with the October march into Czechoslovakia,
and the November "Crystal Night" against Jews in Berlin, Hitler was
politically positioned to unleash a new world war.
Such are the disasters suffered by those people of a nation which
tolerates the sort of coup d'etat being run now against the U.S.
Constitution and President, a coup being run by those Republicans
and others, who have stated their disposition to welcome the
otherwise unelectable Al Gore immediately into the office of
President.
- Schacht and Gore -
To speak with absolute objectivity, Al Gore personally is an
ideologically perverted, wooden-headed fool, utterly lacking in
visible cognitive intelligence, but with a sly and viciously
backstabbing cowardice, nonetheless, a shameless tory fan of the
British monarchy, and crony and bloody-handed accomplice of that
Ramsay MacDonald-style fascist "mad bomber" Tony Blair.
Politically, he is thoroughly owned by the same crew which created
his political career, those intimate circles of the British royal
family, most notably the Duke of Edinburgh and Prince Charles, with
whose pet peeves and perverted causes British lackey Gore became
associated through his patron and controller Armand Hammer.
What Gore is, personally, is essentially nothing. What he is,
politically, is a tool of such others as do not flinch from soiling
their hands by taking over, manipulating, and, in time, discarding,
with equal shamelessness the same pathetic political creatures,
such as Gore, whom they have not merely used, but used up. It is
easy to have contempt for a Gore, but, in himself, he, like the
village idiot and resident firebrand, while a significant public
security risk, is, like any pathetic mental case, hardly deserving
of such strong emotion as personal malice. So, he is being used by
Henry A. Kissinger et al., just as Kissinger set up the President
he manipulated, Richard Nixon, for self-destruction in the
Watergate affair. If you recognize Gore as the pathetic bi-polar
personality he is, you can readily understand how he is manipulated
by those, of the likes of Henry Kissinger, who use him, as if he
were a mere puppet on a string.
The Gore problem lies entirely in two matters. First, the
strategic purpose for which he, as a mere dupe of his own pathetic
ambitions, is being used. Second, the disgusting corruption shown
by those, like a Clay T. Whitehead or cronies of the Henry A.
Kissinger and Bush pack, who wittingly betray the United States
itself in such ways as to put not only this nation, but much of the
world at strategic risk. This is a risk so grave that no standard
of comparison from the earlier experience of this century, even two
World Wars, measures the sheer awfulness of the treasonous things
those accomplices of the "secret committee" operations around Gore
are doing.
On the Gore issue, it is thus time for Americans and others to face
the kinds of facts which the German population of 1932-1933 refused
to face. The comparison of the coup d'etat around Gore with the
earlier case of Hitler, is not only justified; it is morally urgent
that that comparison be made, far and wide, and loud and clear.
Gore must merely learn to play the Cheshire Cat for those childish
occasions, such as costume parties, he finds most compatible with
his limitations; let him, thus, fade, giggling happily, but
quietly, from the scene. Blair, meanwhile, must be removed.
Unless those two related measures are taken, no part of this planet
will be safe for anyone much longer. All Hell is about to bust
loose in the weeks just ahead. Wake up! Put Gore quietly into the
background, and Blair out of the way of doing more harm than he has
done, not only to Britain, but the world, already. Anyone who has
yet to understand the importance of forcing through those two
actions now, knows nothing of much importance about world events
in progress today.
.
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
