-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.zolatimes.com/V3.14/pageone.html
<A HREF="http://www.zolatimes.com/V3.14/pageone.html">Laissez Faire City
Times - Volume 3 Issue 14
</A>
-----
The Laissez Faire City Times
April 5, 1999 - Volume 3, Issue 14
Editor & Chief: Emile Zola
-----
Taxes on Mars

by Peter Topolewski


Ontario is Canada� richest province. Average income of Ontarians in 1998
was $27,309 (all currency amounts are quoted in Canadian dollars).
Converted to American dollars, that comes in just below Mississippi, the
poorest state in all the United States.

The reason for the disparity is obvious to those who care to look:
Canada is the land of regurgitated wealth.

All except the extremely poor (and their numbers are growing) toss about
half of their income into the belly of the governing system to have
small bits of it spit back at the entire populace in a rather even smear
of inadequate and inefficient services. In such an arrangement one is,
for taxable reasons, considered wealthy if one earns 60,000 or more
dollars a year. In Canada not only is it difficult to become wealthy
(even by these paltry standards), there is no incentive to do so.
Financial success is punished like no other.

In the vicious relationship between government supply and public demand
� and which came first remains a mystery � lies the reason Canada is
successfully making a move for the most oppressive tax system in the
world. The public�s child-like dependence on the government, and the
government infrastructure designed to satisfy that dependence, has
helped create and justify Canada�s tax regime. Among the results:
�Using a $60,000 threshold to classify citizens as "wealthy" and
therefore tax them the hardest.
�Provincial sales taxes averaging about 7 percent, plus a 7 percent
federal sales tax on nearly all good and services. Any wonder Canada is
officially a country of bargain hunters?
�A 7 percent luxury tax on any vehicle over $30,000. Soon enough those
hoping to avoid this can look forward to cruising the streets in Yugo�s.
�Alcohol, tobacco, and gasoline taxes average one half of the purchase
prices. Twelve beers cost about $18 and a gallon of gasoline about
$1.80.
�Government lottery companies that collect millions of dollars a month
from poor schmucks in exchange for the faintest hope of rescuing them
from their ruts. For many, a winning lottery ticket is the only way
they�ll get their heads above water; spending their extra cash on the
tickets conveniently keeps them where they are.
�According to recent studies, two thirds of Canadian homeowners are
below the poverty level.
�The ratio of consumer debt and mortgages to after-tax income is 101
percent.
�The average Canadian has a net worth of $400.

Such is the price of the glorious, Soviet way of life in Canada. An
unusual phenomenon has contributed to the cost. It could go by many
names � stupidity, ignorance, apathy, laziness, who knows what else? �
but the fact remains that Canadians bitch about taxes out of one side of
their mouth, and demand more government handouts from the other. In
British Columbia (BC) polls indicated that the public�s pre-budget
fervor called for more government spending. These cries reached their
peak during a week when the media was in a frenzy over expectations of
the government�s sixth consecutive budget deficit. The public attitude
in light of this expectation demonstrated several levels of stupidity.

First, according to the same polls most British Columbians didn�t even
know the provincial budgets had been in deficit, as the new one was
expected to be. Citizens have surrendered all sense and responsibility.

Second, while feeling screwed by government taxes and staring public
debt in the face, everybody suffers from the equivalent of a brain melt.
They make no connection between these two suffocating problems and their
own demand for more government services and government pampering (that
is, jobs). At night you can almost here them murmuring in their sleep:
the government grows money on trees.

Third, people look to the government as the Almighty Provider �
completely detached and lording above the people, and wholly capable of
providing for our needs with something resembling efficiency. Well, the
story of the government�s business genius is in the numbers. And while
politicians and bureaucrats alike claim they work in the interest of
preserving the socialist way of life, their results prove only one of
two things, and neither has a thing to do with preserving the current
state of affairs. Either,
�The government hopes to strain the system so they can collect and
control 100 percent of the people�s money, or
�The government is completely incompetent.

So who�s stupider, the government or the people who count on it to baby
them? You be the judge.

The Grim Case of British Columbia

British Columbia�s 1998-1999 fiscal year ended on March 31st. Last year
Finance Minister Joy McPhail projected a deficit of $95 million. It came
in at $544 million. That�s some fine bookwork. The two budgets previous
were, in the heat of an election, promised to be budget surpluses. Lies.
On March 30th the finance minister announced her budget strategy for the
only shrinking economy in Canada � a $890 million deficit. This is "a
different way of budgeting" she says, thinly disguising an
acknowledgement that her government�s previous budgets were nothing but
shams. This one is too. If she ran the numbers, as the provincial
auditor general has repeatedly asked this government to, the real
deficit emerges: $1.5 billion.

This is the government�s sixth consecutive budget deficit and the third
for the current premier Glen Clark, the man who said, "balancing a
budget is the easiest thing in the world to do." His finance minister
has �fessed up that the government will not likely balance the budget
during its mandate, due to run out in 2001. Under Clark, provincial debt
will reach $35 billion by this time next year. In his stewardship it has
ballooned by $6 billion, and total government spending (not just its
bogus budget spending) is due to fatten the debt another $3 billion this
year.

To people who actually complain about this tragedy the government
refrains, "no business operates without being allowed to run deficits."
Apparently no one noticed that government is not a business. Or more
importantly that government has no right being in business. For in BC
the government has its paws in railroads, electricity, ferries,
buildings, casinos, lotteries, liquor sales, and construction   to name
a few. The current government has again and again demonstrated the
nature of its adeptness at managing these companies. Since 1991, when
the New Democrat government took power, the BC Ferries Corporation has
seen its debt increase from $15 million to, as of April 1, $1.35
billion. Even before the latest budget added $450 million to the
company�s debt ceiling, it owed more than it owned. Congratulations to
the government eggheads. That�s called insolvency.

Not surprisingly, this type of mismanagement, easily found at most of
the government�s companies, is continually omitted from the government�s
budget. Their lies, however, won�t win them any accounting awards.

Not to leave the peons completely in the dark, the government announced
the thinking behind the $890 million deficit that it did own up to in
this year�s budget. That deficit, Finance Minister MacPhail says,
reflects the choice her government has made to try to improve its
financial position by growing the economy. And thus she has laid bare
the key to this insanity. Injecting borrowed money that taxpayers are on
the line for creates a closed system. Somehow these people believe that
these loans will slush around in the citizens� hands and miraculously
multiply by a high enough power to pay off the existing debt, plus the
newly borrowed money, plus the accumulating interest on it. Maybe with
those loans they plan on planting some of those money-growing trees.

With cynicism reaching all time highs, one has a difficult time being
surprised by the stunts in this circus. But amazingly, some performers
have tricks that can still leave some of us breathless. Union leaders
and doctors � both among the fattest government trough-feeders � wanted
the government to spend more money in its last budget. They can make no
connection between their exorbitant government salaries, unconscionable
taxes, and crippling debt, leaving me at least to believe their brains
have been surgically removed.

Finally, the kicker, and this from the government that has not balanced
a single budget, but has assiduously doubled British Columbia�s debt.
After presenting the public with the steaming heap she called a budget,
and after admitting she won�t likely balance a budget during her
government�s mandate, the finance minister called for a public debate
over how to spend upcoming surpluses.

A message to NASA and the US federal government: forget trying to be the
first people to Mars. Most Canadians are already living there.

-30-

from The Laissez Faire City Times, Vol 3, No 14, April 5, 1999
-----
Published by
Laissez Faire City Netcasting Group, Inc.
Copyright 1998 - Trademark Registered with LFC Public Registrar
All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer
The Laissez Faire City Times is a private newspaper. Although it is
published by a corporation domiciled within the sovereign domain of
Laissez Faire City, it is not an "official organ" of the city or its
founding trust. Just as the New York Times is unaffiliated with the city
of New York, the City Times is only one of what may be several news
publications located in, or domiciled at, Laissez Faire City proper. For
information about LFC, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to