-Caveat Lector-

washingtonpost.com
Officer Alleges CIA Retaliation
Lawsuit Says Agency Urged False Reporting on Iraqi Arms
By Dana Priest
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, December 9, 2004; Page A02


A senior CIA operative who handled sensitive informants in Iraq asserts that CIA managers asked him to falsify his reporting on weapons of mass destruction and retaliated against him after he refused.

The operative, who remains under cover, asserts in a lawsuit made public
yesterday that a co-worker warned him in 2001 "that CIA management planned
to 'get him' for his role in reporting intelligence contrary to official CIA
dogma."

The subject of that reporting has been blacked out by the CIA, and the word
"Iraq" does not appear in the heavily redacted version of the legal
complaint, but the remaining language and context make clear that the
officer's work related to prewar intelligence on Iraq's alleged weapons of
mass destruction.

In the lawsuit, the officer asserts that CIA managers retaliated against him
for refusing their demands by beginning a counterintelligence investigation
of allegations that he had sex with a female asset and by initiating an
inspector general's investigation into allegations that he stole money meant
to be used to pay human assets.

Those investigations, the lawsuit asserts, were "initiated for the sole
purpose of discrediting him and retaliating against him for questioning the
integrity of the WMD reporting . . . and for refusing to falsify his
intelligence reporting to support the politically mandated conclusion" of
matters that are redacted in the lawsuit.

The lawsuit marks the first public instance in which a CIA employee has
charged directly that agency officials pressured him to produce intelligence
to support the administration's prewar position that Iraq's weapons of mass
destruction were a grave and gathering threat, and to suppress information
that ran counter to that view.

"Their official dogma was contradicted by his reporting and they did not
want to hear it," said Roy Krieger, the officer's attorney.

Anya Guilsher, a CIA spokeswoman, said the agency could not comment on the
lawsuit but added, "The notion that CIA managers order officers to falsify
reports is flat wrong. Our mission is to call it like we see it and report
the facts."

Critics of the Iraq war have asserted the administration pressured analysts
and operators to produce information that bolstered the administration's
case for invading Iraq. Congressional investigations did not find evidence
to support that charge, but found that the CIA did not have enough spies in
Iraq and that the analysis of the highly circumstantial evidence was
mischaracterized as firmer than it was.

No biological or chemical weapons have been found in Iraq. A subsequent
CIA-led investigation found that Iraq was nowhere near producing a nuclear
weapon, as the administration had asserted.

The unnamed operative is a 23-year officer of Middle Eastern descent who
spent much of his career on secret and covert operations to collect
intelligence on and interdict weapons of mass destruction, the lawsuit says.

In 2002, the lawsuit says, the CIA officer "attempted to report routine
intelligence" from a human asset "but was thwarted by CIA superiors." It
goes on to say that he was subsequently approached by a senior desk officer
"who insisted that Plaintiff falsify his reporting," and that when he
refused, the "management" of the CIA's Counterproliferation Division ordered
that he "remove himself from any further 'handling' " of the unnamed asset,
who is referred elsewhere in the document as "a highly respected human
asset."

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Washington on Friday and placed
in the public court docket yesterday after a judge said it could proceed
using a pseudonym for the plaintiff, says his superiors falsely promised him
that they would report his findings to President Bush and falsely claimed
that they had disseminated some of his other reports through normal
channels.

In 2003, the lawsuit says, the CIA officer learned of the
counterintelligence investigation of allegations that he was having sex with
a female asset. Five days later, it says, he was told that a promotion was
being canceled "because of pressure from the DDO [Deputy Director of
Operations] James Pavitt."

Pavitt declined to comment.

In September 2003, the CIA placed the officer on administrative leave
without explanation, the lawsuit says. Eight months later, it says, the
inspector general's office advised him that he was under investigation for
"diverting to his own use monies provided him for payment to human assets."
The document says the allegations were made by the same managers who had
asked him to falsify reports.

In August 2004, he was terminated "for unspecified reasons," the lawsuit
says. It requests that his employment, salary and promotions be restored and
that the CIA pay compensatory damages and legal fees.

In a letter to CIA acting general counsel John Rizzo dated Dec. 6, Krieger
requested a meeting between the officer and CIA Director Porter J. Goss
because of "the serious nature of the allegations in this case, including
deliberately misleading the President on intelligence concerning weapons of
mass destruction."



© 2004 The Washington Post Company

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to