-Caveat Lector-
Hi everyone...I would like to draw your attention to a brilliant article
written by a dear friend of mine Behzad Sarmast, better known as "Behz" He
pretty much sums up what has been happening on our mixed up backwards planet.
I have part of the article below..the rest can be read by following the link
at the bottom...enjoy
Kinda
UNITED STATES OF URANTIA
INTRODUCTION
As humanity nears the twenty-first century after Christ, and as all the world
watches and waits in anticipation of things to come, we present this paper to
every God-knowing individual on planet Earth. No matter what your religion or
philosophy, if you follow and serve the Universal Father of truth, beauty, and
goodness, you are of us.
This paper is meant to give an analysis of the political, social, and
spiritual status of our world as it stands today, and provide the means by
which all believers may formulate personal decisions and create their own
destinies in the days ahead. It is our sincere hope and desire that these
words uplift, inform, and benefit the people of our planet, even every
individual.
Throughout history the human race has experimented with countless social and
political systems. Even democracy which is cherished as an ideal by so many
was invented long before the advent of Christ. But never in our entire history
has the opportunity existed for a government that can seize the authority and
wield power over the whole of the planet -- there is indeed something new
under the sun.
It is beyond the scope of this work to examine the history and methods used in
bringing the world to this level of cosmic insanity. It is merely our wish to
examine the goals and ideals of this coming system, and test its viability as
contrasted by the universal laws.
As always the present is intimately connected with the past, and in order to
understand the future we have to go back at least two centuries.
CONSTITUTIONAL MYTHOLOGY
Even two centuries after its inception, the Constitution of the United States
of America remains a source of misconception and confusion for the masses.
Patriots and Christians alike have accepted the God spoken of in the
Declaration of Independence as their own. Indeed, the pen is mightier than the
sword, and the scribes of this Declaration knew their craft well. It should be
remembered that in separating from Europe and its corrupted churches, the
American government went further to separate from God himself -- the baby was
thrown out with the bathwater. Despite popular myth, this nation was not
founded on biblical principles, and it is interesting that this has to be
revealed to people when the official seal of the nation has emblazoned this
fact from the very beginning. The Latin "Annuit Coeptis Novus Ordo Seclorum"
means "Announcing the birth of the new secular order."
Unfortunately, the "fathers" of the land were not the God-fearing Christians
people are led to believe. Thomas Jefferson, one of the most influential
individuals in setting up the laws of the land was an atheist and always used
the word God to mean nature, forever confusing later generations. The
"Jefferson Bible" which he penned himself was extracted from the biblical
gospel of Jesus, but it does not have a single mention of Jesus' divinity, his
miracles, allusions to the after-life, resurrection, or anything whatsoever
having to do with the gospel as we know it. To Jefferson, and so many other
Masons responsible for the Constitution, Jesus was only a benevolent teacher
whose existence ended on the cross. Everything else was blamed on unscrupulous
men who added divinity to Jesus' story after his human life, and human death.
The gospel according to Tom ends with Jesus' entombment.
So many for so long have been intentionally or unintentionally confused by the
way different beliefs use the common word "God." In the days to come it would
be wise to discern the difference between the "God" of the humanists and the
God of Christ. Einstein was a dues-paying member of the Humanist Society of NY
and yet because of his many references to the "God" of the universe people
mistakenly think of him as a believer. In fact he rejected the notion of a
personal Creator and held the idea of an after-life and divinity in contempt,
reserved only for the "egoistic imagination" of unstable individuals.
Comparatively speaking, up until recent times atheists were not at liberty to
expose their "blasphemous" beliefs and because of persecution have for
centuries learned to use words to disguise their ideology. Much of what we
hear on a day-to-day basis in public today would have been punishable by death
just a few hundred years ago, and often was.
The God of the Constitution was far, very far, from our heavenly Father. In
short, the God mentioned in the Constitution and the Declaration of
Independence is nature. The efficiency and beauty of nature should not be
confused with its laws, and the laws of God are not the same as the laws of
nature. The only laws afforded by nature are "might is right" and "survival of
the fittest," and the human struggle to leave the jungle is symbolic of our
quest for higher laws. Nature is not an object of worship, and its laws are
not worthy of human society -- humanity was not meant to live by jungle-law
indefinitely.
While the humanistic laws of the USA and its system of government was, and
still is a noble gesture compared to ecclesiastical monopolies and
dictatorships, it is far from perfect and hardly worthy of deification. It was
only natural that a system without God would sometime come to an end; indeed,
it was inevitable.
195:10.7 "No social system or political regime which denies the reality of God
can contribute in any constructive and lasting manner to the advancement of
human civilization."
NEW SECULAR ORDER
While the American government was a secular state encompassing a small portion
of the planet, the global version would yield dramatically greater
consequences for the future of the human race, as its success would mean the
end of ageless conflicts between differing beliefs -- only one side could
survive.
99:4.9 "Transition is always accompanied by confusion, and there will be
little tranquillity in the religious world until the great struggle between
the three contending philosophies of religion is ended:
1. The spiritistic belief (in a providential Deity) of many religions.
2. The humanistic and idealistic belief of many philosophies.
3. The mechanistic and naturalistic conceptions of many sciences."
1. Providential Deity (Fundamentalism) --The greatest obstacle to the goals of
the secular internationalists will come from the way of the crystallized
religionists; that is, the authoritative and major religions of the world like
Paulism/Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. Although these religions as
expressed today are more often than not far from the gospel of their
respective prophets, they are nonetheless all monotheistic and will never
willingly accept a Godless order.
Each has crystallized over the ages to the point where science undermines some
of their most basic but fundamental tenets, and have therefore become
regressive and dysfunctional. Though they cannot hope to in and of themselves
carry humanity to the next level of evolution, and though their ideas of
morality and righteousness are often convoluted and hypocritical, they are the
pillars of monotheism on Earth and have managed to carry the planet forward
and away from the constant threat of naturalism and atheism. When the time
comes, these groups will have to take the leap of faith to a higher level and
adhere to the words of their respective prophets over the interpretation of
the scribes, mullahs, priests, and rabbis.
2. Humanism -- This group is comprised of often well-meaning but disillusioned
individuals who have opted for a Godless but idealistic philosophy which
steers clear of the notion of a "wrathful God." Through the many atrocities
committed by the so-called believers who have often killed in the name of God,
the humanists have chosen a philosophy that rejects the anthropomorphic
concepts of deity pervading our planet while it upholds the very qualities of
the God they stopped believing in: truth, beauty, and goodness.
It should be noted that these classifications of different groups are
necessarily generalized, and as observed with humanism there are many
different branches of understanding and belief within each group. Just like
the religious fundamentalists, the humanists also envision the new century to
be dominated by their philosophy and ideals. But these self-professed helpers
of humanity who follow the linear grasp of "reason" must sooner or later come
to a fork in the road, and the time is fast approaching when the humanists and
agnostics will have to make a critical decision, as walking the fence will no
longer suffice.
3. Naturalism -- The third group consists of a wide and panoramic range of
beliefs, including "nature worship," pantheism, monism, and mechanistic
science. It should be understood that naturalists are not merely adoring the
beauty of nature, but rather believe in and follow the "laws of nature," and
subsequently must sometime come to believe that humans are no more than
animals and society is no more than a human jungle. Such individuals come to
believe in the "ruthless pursuit of self-interest," and see this as good,
true, and "natural."
Pantheists, Wiccans, monists, naturalistic scientists, hard-core New Agers,
and even Luciferians share the misfortune of blindness to cosmic reality in
rejection of the Universal Father, and with the continuation of their
respective philosophies must sooner or later come to the share the same
animalistic reality. People who believe in the "survival of the fittest"
cannot be counted on to make wise decisions when it comes to the life and
death of others, or show brotherly love in a reality they see as no more than
a place where the biggest wolves are the most "fit". Nevertheless, soon enough
they too will have to reveal their true character when all are forced to
choose between cosmic reality and "cold objectivity".
Fundamentalists revere religion while rejecting science and often even
philosophy. Humanists reject religion while struggling with philosophy and
science. And naturalists worship science while rejecting religion and sound
philosophy. Each of these groups clings to only one part of reality, and in
rejecting the others each manages to wallow in dysfunctionality and remain
unable to get off the ground. It is eternally true, only through the combined
forces of loving spiritual insight, a philosophy that reaches beyond self, and
a science that discerns more than atoms and molecules can humanity ever hope
to exit the jungle.
OBJECTIVES OF GLOBAL SECULARISM
<A HREF="http://members.tripod.com/~CRCOD/USU5.html">
http://members.tripod.com/~CRCOD/USU5.html</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
