Linda:
>At 06:27 PM 12/28/98 -0600, you wrote with the latest from Drudge.
>Here is a manifestation of the counter-attack, against the real
>coup-in-progress.
Brian
-----------
AL GORE & ADOLF HITLER
by
Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.
Date: December 22, 1998
The currently ongoing coup d'etat, aimed to bring Vice-President Al
Gore quickly into the
U.S. Presidency, was proposed publicly, by former U.S. Secretary of State
Henry A. Kissinger,
in the October 15 London {Daily Telegraph}. More recently, in the December
15 edition of {The
Wall Street Journal}, former Nixon aide Clay T. Whitehead, described that
type of secret
committee which Kissinger was proposing for a Gore coup d'etat, as it had
operated inside the
Nixon administration. This was, in fact, the so-called "Watergate"
operation which Kissinger, in
fact, coordinated under Vice-President Ford.
Whitehead's version of Kissinger's proposals, then and now, coincides
exactly with a series of
coordinated actions, which have been operating within the Clinton
Administration, largely
behind President Clinton's back. These operations, centered around
Vice-President Al Gore, have
been pushed as a plan of action for preparing the ouster of the President.
Neither of these two insider "secret committees," that which operated
against Nixon under
Kissinger, or the not-so-secret "national security" cabal now aligned
against Clinton, behind
Gore, is really original. As the writer Plutarch would have described it,
there is an ominous
parallel between the presently attempted coup d'etat against President
Clinton, and way in which
the government of Germany's Chancellor Kurt von Schleicher was overthrown,
on January 28,
1933 by Hjalmar Schacht and London-backed forces inside the German
parliament, to hustle
Adolf Hitler into power.
To see the connection clearly, first consider crucial highlights of the
process through which a
then-otherwise unelectable candidate Hitler was brought into the
Chancellorship, on January 30,
1933, and to dictatorial power on February 28, less than one month later.
The same
London-centered, Anglo-American financier interests, now represented by
Prime Minister Tony
Blair, which brought the then virtually unelectable Hitler to power in
Germany, are behind the
use of a rabid Anglophile, the virtually unelectable Presidential candidate
Al Gore, in the effort
to run a parliamentary coup d'etat now, against Clinton, as against von
Schleicher earlier.
Both the motive and the method behind these coup d'etats are so nearly
identical, not only in
astonishing fineness of certain details, but in crucial strategic
implications, as to scare the pants
off any U.S. citizen still capable of honest thinking.
It is time for us all to say, "Never again!" and let Al Gore serve out
the remainder of his term,
in that quiet and obscurity which our nation's security interest demands for
him.
- {Schacht &
Hitler} -
If we examine both matters in their crucial, political-economic
setting, there is a precise
parallel between the British Commonwealth-directed launching of the
"Whitewatergate"
targetting of President Bill Clinton, by the failed re-election campaign of
President George Bush,
during 1992, and the earlier process leading to Hitler's legal coup d'etat
of January 28-February
28, 1933. The economic issues, in both cases, are defined most sharply, by
comparing the global
crisis-developments which burst into the open during October 1997, with the
collapse of
Germany's discredited Social-Democratic government and party, in the
aftermath of the 1929
U.S. stock-market panic.
The attempt of the Social-Democratic government to find a "Third Way"
between the German
population and maddened international bankers, led to the fall of that
government, and an
ensuing succession of "ministerial" governments, from March 30, 1930, during
the time of the
British government of Tony Blair "lookalike" Ramsay MacDonald, through
President
Hindenburg's appointment of Adolf Hitler on January 28, 1933.
The key, London-directed figure of Germany throughout this period was
Brooklyn, N.Y.-born
Hjalmar Horace Greeley Schacht, a life-long asset of the J.P. Morgan
interests, with direct
control over Schacht exerted by the Bank of England's Montagu Norman. This
was the same
Norman who was also an employee of the financial house of Averell Harriman,
during all of the
relevant years leading up to and beyond the Hitler coup d'etat. It was
Schacht, deployed, by
Norman, to bring the New York bankers into support for Hitler, who, assisted
by British
intelligence services, organized the German side of the Hitler coup d'etat
against the government
of Kurt von Schleicher (and Hitler's later assassination of von Schleicher).
The Anglo-American financiers' immediate motive for bringing Hitler to
power, was the
commitment of those London and New York bankers behind Schacht, to prevent
the
implementation of an economic-recovery policy designed by a brilliant key
figure, Dr. Wilhelm
Lautenbach, of the pro-U.S.A. Friedrich List Society. Notably, the
Lautenbach plan, like the
tradition of Friedrich List himself, expressed the political-economic
philosophy of the founders
of the U.S.A., and was the only policy, other than the like-minded President
Franklin Roosevelt's
U.S. recovery policy which could have provided a democratic solution for
what is known in most
history books as "The Great Depression." This Lautenbach plan, which echoes
the November
1989 recovery plan of Deutsche Bank's assassinated Alfred Herrhausen, was
the intended
economic recovery program for a von Schleicher government in Germany. It was
Norman's
puppet Schacht, who deployed to New York, to mobilize Wall Street support
for a coup d'etat to
bring Hitler immediately into power in Germany.
Notably, Schacht motivated the coup d'etat, by libelling the Lautenbach
plan, and von
Schleicher as "Bolsheviks" who had to be stopped, just as Gore's backers use
the foolish Gore as
their spearhead for putting an "enemy image" on the faces of the
pro-national sovereignty
governments of Mexico, China, Russia, Malaysia, et al. Gore's deployment, on
behalf of the
British Duke of Edinburgh's Transparency International, to classify defense
of national
sovereignty as "corruption," shows the motive behind rabid Anglophile Gore's
bloody hand in
the situation today.
In a situation similar to that of 1932-1933 Germany, today, the only
workable alternative for
the presently ongoing disintegration of the world's financial system, is the
"New Bretton Woods"
program which I have introduced. With the full confirmation of my warning of
an October 1997
crisis, that "New Bretton Woods" orientation went immediately onto a leading
place on world's
agenda. It met resistance from the same species of sources (e.g., London's
neo-Thatcherite,
neo-MacDonald Prime Minister Tony Blair), which resisted the Lautenbach plan
during
1931-1933. Essentially, it is the same Anglo-American financier interests,
who backed Hitler and
opposed Franklin Roosevelt, during 1933-1938, who are behind the use of Al
Gore as their
cat's-paw today. The economic, strategic, and social consequences of a Gore
coup d'etat now,
would be similar to, but far worse than the outcome of the original Hitler
coup d'etat.
The result of that reaction, is the deployment of what Kissinger and
Clay T. Whitehead have
described as a "secret committee" organized to prepare for a coup d'etat
against the U.S.
Constitution and its incumbent President, Bill Clinton.
It must be emphasized, again, that the strategic implications of such
an Anglo-American
national-security posture, under presently unfolding world economic,
political, and social
conditions, would, if tolerated, ensure a far more devastating result than
Anglo-American
bankers' unleashing of the 1933 Hitler coup.
- {The Flavor of
1932-1934} -
The chronology of the most crucial related developments in the U.S.A.,
Britain and Germany
during of 1929-1934, gives the flavor of the situation -- then, and now.
The count-down to the Hitler coup d'etat began in Paris, with the
fateful prelude to the
outbreak of the Great Depression, the June 7, 1929 failure of the Young Plan
to provide workable
alternatives for the looming international disaster posed by the unresolved
issues of Germany's
war-reparations debt. The immediate next shoe to drop, came in England, with
the August 9,
1929 formation of the second government of Labour Party Prime Minister
(James) Ramsay
MacDonald. MacDonald's quasi-fascist government, which remained in office
until June 7, 1935,
is the forerunner of today's Blair regime. This was followed by not only the
October 24, 1929
stock-market panic in New York, but also the November 9, 1932 election of
"American
Methods" spokesman Franklin Roosevelt as President-elect of the U.S.A.
Notably, Wall Street
and London adversary Roosevelt was, in economics, a co-thinker of the
American System
political-economic policies of Germany's Wilhelm Lautenbach.
The Anglo-American bankers responded to this crisis of the Young Plan's
failure, by pulling
down the Grand Coalition government of Social-Democratic Chancellor Hermann
Mueller, on
March 27, 1930. The coup d'etat was set off by a rigged crisis in the German
government. The
issue of the second reading of the doomed Young Plan, was turned into a de
facto coup d'etat by
the abrupt resignation, on March 7, of the British bankers' agent Hjalmar
Schacht from his
position as President of Germany's central bank, the Reichsbank. In the
ensuing parliamentary
crisis, the Mueller government collapsed on March 27, and the "Ramsay
MacDonald of
Germany," the brutal Heinrich Bruening, was installed on March 30.
From that point, until the London-run coup d'etat against the von
Schleicher government, thus
bringing the otherwise unelectable Hitler to power in January 30, 1933,
Germany was ruled by a
series of four ministerial regimes, all of which excepting the von
Schleicher government, were
tools of Schacht and the de facto Schacht-controlled Center Party.
That period, from 1928 through the September 12, 1932 collapse of the
von Papen
government, saw a combined, sudden collapse in the Social-Democratic vote
for the national
parliament, and a zooming upward of the Nazi vote. However, with the
progressive
self-discrediting of the Social-Democratic Party, the fall of the von Papen
government was
echoed by a significant turn away from the Nazi party, too. Schacht regarded
the possibility of a
coup d'etat against von Schleicher, as London's last chance to keep the
Hitler option alive.
London and Wall Street were alarmed by the coincidence between Roosevelt's
November 9,
1932 status as President-elect of the U.S.A., and von Schliecher and
Lautenbach's American
System economic policies coming into power in Germany.
So, the British, together with London's assets Morgan and Harriman,
joined London in
deploying the parliamentary coup d'etat against von Schleicher, and bringing
Hitler into power.
- {An Ominous Lesson for
Today} -
There is another bitter lesson for today, to be learned from the later
events of 1933-1938. The
immediate, foolish response to Hitler's appointment as Chancellor, from the
Communists, Social-
Democrats, and others, was, in effect, "Wait until the Germans begin to see
what Hitler is like;
they will turn to us." It did not work out that way. See the tempo of
events leading into Hitler's
consolidation of dictatorial and strategic power.
Von Schleicher was ousted on Jan. 28, 1932. Hitler was made Chancellor
on Jan. 30. On the
night of Feb. 27, the unprotected German parliament building, the Reichstag,
was burned down
in an arson attack. That incident was used by the Nazi government of
Prussia, under Hermann
Goering, to launch a wave of terror against the political opponents and
rivals of the Nazis. The
power of government by decree, under the terms of the so-called
{Notverordnung}, was
activated, giving Hitler power of rule by emergency decree. By April 7, the
{Gleichschaltung}
laws, Nazi Propaganda Minister Josef Goebbels' echo of Prince Metternich's
1819 Carlsbad
{Beschluesse} (decrees) were installed, coinciding with the purging of Jews
from influential
positions in Prussian society. The Nazi book-burning was launched on May
10.
Hitler's dictatorship was consolidated rapidly during the following
months. In the famous
plebiscite of November 1933, the Nazi vote reported was more than 96 percent
of the total. The
end to effective resistance came in the Summer of 1934, approximately a year
and a half after
Schacht's orchestration of the coup d'etat against the von Schleicher
government. This
consolidation of Hitler's personal power as a dictator, came in three
developments:
1.) The "night of the long knives," the so-called Roehm purge, which
eliminated not only
potential challengers to Hitler from within the populist-based "brown
shirts" of his own party,
but also provided the occasion to assassinate a key target of Schacht's
hatred, former German
Chancellor and General Kurt von Schliecher.
2.) The convenient death, on Aug. 2, of President Paul von Hindenburg.
3.) Hitler's use of the occasion of President Hindenburg's death to
supersede the elective
position of President by Hitler's perpetual personal authority as {Fuehrer}.
Thus, on August 19, 1934 Hitler's dictatorship was consolidated. By the
close of 1938, with the
October march into Czechoslovakia, and the November "Crystal Night" against
Jews in Berlin,
Hitler was politically positioned to unleash a new world war.
Such are the disasters suffered by those people of a nation which
tolerates the sort of coup
d'etat being run now against the U.S. Constitution and President, a coup
being run by those
Republicans and others, who have stated their disposition to welcome the
otherwise unelectable
Al Gore immediately into the office of President.
- {Schacht and
Gore} -
To speak with absolute objectivity, Al Gore personally is an
ideologically perverted,
wooden-headed fool, utterly lacking in visible cognitive intelligence, but
with a sly and viciously
backstabbing cowardice, nonetheless, a shameless tory fan of the British
monarchy, and crony
and bloody-handed accomplice of that Ramsay MacDonald-style fascist "mad
bomber" Tony
Blair. Politically, he is thoroughly owned by the same crew which created
his political career,
those intimate circles of the British royal family, most notably the Duke of
Edinburgh and
Prince Charles, with whose pet peeves and perverted causes British lackey
Gore became
associated through his patron and controller Armand Hammer.
What Gore is, personally, is essentially nothing. What he is,
politically, is a tool of such
others as do not flinch from soiling their hands by taking over,
manipulating, and, in time,
discarding, with equal shamelessness the same pathetic political creatures,
such as Gore, whom
they have not merely used, but used up. It is easy to have contempt for a
Gore, but, in himself,
he, like the village idiot and resident firebrand, while a significant
public security risk, is, like
any pathetic mental case, hardly deserving of such strong emotion as
personal malice. So, he is
being used by Henry A. Kissinger et al., just as Kissinger set up the
President he manipulated,
Richard Nixon, for self-destruction in the Watergate affair. If you
recognize Gore as the pathetic
bi-polar personality he is, you can readily understand how he is
manipulated by those, of the
likes of Henry Kissinger, who use him, as if he were a mere puppet on a
string.
The Gore problem lies entirely in two matters. First, the strategic
purpose for which he, as a
mere dupe of his own pathetic ambitions, is being used. Second, the
disgusting corruption shown
by those, like a Clay T. Whitehead or cronies of the Henry A. Kissinger and
Bush pack, who
wittingly betray the United States itself in such ways as to put not only
this nation, but much of
the world at strategic risk. This is a risk so grave that no standard of
comparison from the earlier
experience of this century, even two World Wars, measures the sheer
awfulness of the treasonous
things those accomplices of the "secret committee" operations around Gore
are doing.
On the Gore issue, it is thus time for Americans and others to face the
kinds of facts which the
German population of 1932-1933 refused to face. The comparison of the coup
d'etat around
Gore with the earlier case of Hitler, is not only justified; it is morally
urgent that that comparison
be made, far and wide, and loud and clear.
Gore must merely learn to play the Cheshire Cat for those childish
occasions, such as costume
parties, he finds most compatible with his limitations; let him, thus, fade,
giggling happily, but
quietly, from the scene. Blair, meanwhile, must be removed. Unless those two
related measures
are taken, no part of this planet will be safe for anyone much longer. All
Hell is about to bust
loose in the weeks just ahead. Wake up! Put Gore quietly into the
background, and Blair out of
the way of doing more harm than he has done, not only to Britain, but the
world, already.
Anyone who has yet to understand the importance of forcing through those two
actions now,
knows nothing of much importance about world events in progress today.
For more information,
please call Brian Lantz
at (800) 580-6901
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more information,
please call Brian Lantz
at (800) 580-6901
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AL GORE & ADOLF HITLER
by Lyndon H.
LaRouche, Jr.
Date: December 22, 1998
The currently ongoing coup d'etat, aimed to bring Vice-President Al Gore quickly
into the
U.S. Presidency, was proposed publicly, by former U.S. Secretary of State Henry A.
Kissinger,
in the October 15 London {Daily Telegraph}. More recently, in the December 15 edition
of {The
Wall Street Journal}, former Nixon aide Clay T. Whitehead, described that type of
secret
committee which Kissinger was proposing for a Gore coup d'etat, as it had operated
inside the
Nixon administration. This was, in fact, the so-called "Watergate" operation which
Kissinger, in
fact, coordinated under Vice-President Ford.
Whitehead's version of Kissinger's proposals, then and now, coincides exactly
with a series of
coordinated actions, which have been operating within the Clinton Administration,
largely
behind President Clinton's back. These operations, centered around Vice-President Al
Gore, have
been pushed as a plan of action for preparing the ouster of the President.
Neither of these two insider "secret committees," that which operated against
Nixon under
Kissinger, or the not-so-secret "national security" cabal now aligned against Clinton,
behind
Gore, is really original. As the writer Plutarch would have described it, there is an
ominous
parallel between the presently attempted coup d'etat against President Clinton, and
way in which
the government of Germany's Chancellor Kurt von Schleicher was overthrown, on January
28,
1933 by Hjalmar Schacht and London-backed forces inside the German parliament, to
hustle
Adolf Hitler into power.
To see the connection clearly, first consider crucial highlights of the process
through which a
then-otherwise unelectable candidate Hitler was brought into the Chancellorship, on
January 30,
1933, and to dictatorial power on February 28, less than one month later. The same
London-centered, Anglo-American financier interests, now represented by Prime Minister
Tony
Blair, which brought the then virtually unelectable Hitler to power in Germany, are
behind the
use of a rabid Anglophile, the virtually unelectable Presidential candidate Al Gore,
in the effort
to run a parliamentary coup d'etat now, against Clinton, as against von Schleicher
earlier.
Both the motive and the method behind these coup d'etats are so nearly identical,
not only in
astonishing fineness of certain details, but in crucial strategic implications, as to
scare the pants
off any U.S. citizen still capable of honest thinking.
It is time for us all to say, "Never again!" and let Al Gore serve out the
remainder of his term,
in that quiet and obscurity which our nation's security interest demands for him.
- {Schacht & Hitler} -
If we examine both matters in their crucial, political-economic setting, there is
a precise
parallel between the British Commonwealth-directed launching of the "Whitewatergate"
targetting of President Bill Clinton, by the failed re-election campaign of President
George Bush,
during 1992, and the earlier process leading to Hitler's legal coup d'etat of January
28-February
28, 1933. The economic issues, in both cases, are defined most sharply, by comparing
the global
crisis-developments which burst into the open during October 1997, with the collapse of
Germany's discredited Social-Democratic government and party, in the aftermath of the
1929
U.S. stock-market panic.
The attempt of the Social-Democratic government to find a "Third Way" between the
German
population and maddened international bankers, led to the fall of that government, and
an
ensuing succession of "ministerial" governments, from March 30, 1930, during the time
of the
British government of Tony Blair "lookalike" Ramsay MacDonald, through President
Hindenburg's appointment of Adolf Hitler on January 28, 1933.
The key, London-directed figure of Germany throughout this period was Brooklyn,
N.Y.-born
Hjalmar Horace Greeley Schacht, a life-long asset of the J.P. Morgan interests, with
direct
control over Schacht exerted by the Bank of England's Montagu Norman. This was the same
Norman who was also an employee of the financial house of Averell Harriman, during all
of the
relevant years leading up to and beyond the Hitler coup d'etat. It was Schacht,
deployed, by
Norman, to bring the New York bankers into support for Hitler, who, assisted by British
intelligence services, organized the German side of the Hitler coup d'etat against the
government
of Kurt von Schleicher (and Hitler's later assassination of von Schleicher).
The Anglo-American financiers' immediate motive for bringing Hitler to power, was
the
commitment of those London and New York bankers behind Schacht, to prevent the
implementation of an economic-recovery policy designed by a brilliant key figure, Dr.
Wilhelm
Lautenbach, of the pro-U.S.A. Friedrich List Society. Notably, the Lautenbach plan,
like the
tradition of Friedrich List himself, expressed the political-economic philosophy of
the founders
of the U.S.A., and was the only policy, other than the like-minded President Franklin
Roosevelt's
U.S. recovery policy which could have provided a democratic solution for what is known
in most
history books as "The Great Depression." This Lautenbach plan, which echoes the
November
1989 recovery plan of Deutsche Bank's assassinated Alfred Herrhausen, was the intended
economic recovery program for a von Schleicher government in Germany. It was Norman's
puppet Schacht, who deployed to New York, to mobilize Wall Street support for a coup
d'etat to
bring Hitler immediately into power in Germany.
Notably, Schacht motivated the coup d'etat, by libelling the Lautenbach plan, and
von
Schleicher as "Bolsheviks" who had to be stopped, just as Gore's backers use the
foolish Gore as
their spearhead for putting an "enemy image" on the faces of the pro-national
sovereignty
governments of Mexico, China, Russia, Malaysia, et al. Gore's deployment, on behalf of
the
British Duke of Edinburgh's Transparency International, to classify defense of national
sovereignty as "corruption," shows the motive behind rabid Anglophile Gore's bloody
hand in
the situation today.
In a situation similar to that of 1932-1933 Germany, today, the only workable
alternative for
the presently ongoing disintegration of the world's financial system, is the "New
Bretton Woods"
program which I have introduced. With the full confirmation of my warning of an
October 1997
crisis, that "New Bretton Woods" orientation went immediately onto a leading place on
world's
agenda. It met resistance from the same species of sources (e.g., London's
neo-Thatcherite,
neo-MacDonald Prime Minister Tony Blair), which resisted the Lautenbach plan during
1931-1933. Essentially, it is the same Anglo-American financier interests, who backed
Hitler and
opposed Franklin Roosevelt, during 1933-1938, who are behind the use of Al Gore as
their
cat's-paw today. The economic, strategic, and social consequences of a Gore coup
d'etat now,
would be similar to, but far worse than the outcome of the original Hitler coup d'etat.
The result of that reaction, is the deployment of what Kissinger and Clay T.
Whitehead have
described as a "secret committee" organized to prepare for a coup d'etat against the
U.S.
Constitution and its incumbent President, Bill Clinton.
It must be emphasized, again, that the strategic implications of such an
Anglo-American
national-security posture, under presently unfolding world economic, political, and
social
conditions, would, if tolerated, ensure a far more devastating result than
Anglo-American
bankers' unleashing of the 1933 Hitler coup.
- {The Flavor of 1932-1934} -
The chronology of the most crucial related developments in the U.S.A., Britain
and Germany
during of 1929-1934, gives the flavor of the situation -- then, and now.
The count-down to the Hitler coup d'etat began in Paris, with the fateful prelude
to the
outbreak of the Great Depression, the June 7, 1929 failure of the Young Plan to
provide workable
alternatives for the looming international disaster posed by the unresolved issues of
Germany's
war-reparations debt. The immediate next shoe to drop, came in England, with the
August 9,
1929 formation of the second government of Labour Party Prime Minister (James) Ramsay
MacDonald. MacDonald's quasi-fascist government, which remained in office until June
7, 1935,
is the forerunner of today's Blair regime. This was followed by not only the October
24, 1929
stock-market panic in New York, but also the November 9, 1932 election of "American
Methods" spokesman Franklin Roosevelt as President-elect of the U.S.A. Notably, Wall
Street
and London adversary Roosevelt was, in economics, a co-thinker of the American System
political-economic policies of Germany's Wilhelm Lautenbach.
The Anglo-American bankers responded to this crisis of the Young Plan's failure,
by pulling
down the Grand Coalition government of Social-Democratic Chancellor Hermann Mueller, on
March 27, 1930. The coup d'etat was set off by a rigged crisis in the German
government. The
issue of the second reading of the doomed Young Plan, was turned into a de facto coup
d'etat by
the abrupt resignation, on March 7, of the British bankers' agent Hjalmar Schacht
from his
position as President of Germany's central bank, the Reichsbank. In the ensuing
parliamentary
crisis, the Mueller government collapsed on March 27, and the "Ramsay MacDonald of
Germany," the brutal Heinrich Bruening, was installed on March 30.
From that point, until the London-run coup d'etat against the von Schleicher
government, thus
bringing the otherwise unelectable Hitler to power in January 30, 1933, Germany was
ruled by a
series of four ministerial regimes, all of which excepting the von Schleicher
government, were
tools of Schacht and the de facto Schacht-controlled Center Party.
That period, from 1928 through the September 12, 1932 collapse of the von Papen
government, saw a combined, sudden collapse in the Social-Democratic vote for the
national
parliament, and a zooming upward of the Nazi vote. However, with the progressive
self-discrediting of the Social-Democratic Party, the fall of the von Papen government
was
echoed by a significant turn away from the Nazi party, too. Schacht regarded the
possibility of a
coup d'etat against von Schleicher, as London's last chance to keep the Hitler option
alive.
London and Wall Street were alarmed by the coincidence between Roosevelt's November 9,
1932 status as President-elect of the U.S.A., and von Schliecher and Lautenbach's
American
System economic policies coming into power in Germany.
So, the British, together with London's assets Morgan and Harriman, joined London
in
deploying the parliamentary coup d'etat against von Schleicher, and bringing Hitler
into power.
- {An Ominous Lesson for Today} -
There is another bitter lesson for today, to be learned from the later events of
1933-1938. The
immediate, foolish response to Hitler's appointment as Chancellor, from the
Communists, Social-
Democrats, and others, was, in effect, "Wait until the Germans begin to see what
Hitler is like;
they will turn to us." It did not work out that way. See the tempo of events leading
into Hitler's
consolidation of dictatorial and strategic power.
Von Schleicher was ousted on Jan. 28, 1932. Hitler was made Chancellor on Jan.
30. On the
night of Feb. 27, the unprotected German parliament building, the Reichstag, was
burned down
in an arson attack. That incident was used by the Nazi government of Prussia, under
Hermann
Goering, to launch a wave of terror against the political opponents and rivals of the
Nazis. The
power of government by decree, under the terms of the so-called {Notverordnung}, was
activated, giving Hitler power of rule by emergency decree. By April 7, the
{Gleichschaltung}
laws, Nazi Propaganda Minister Josef Goebbels' echo of Prince Metternich's 1819
Carlsbad
{Beschluesse} (decrees) were installed, coinciding with the purging of Jews from
influential
positions in Prussian society. The Nazi book-burning was launched on May 10.
Hitler's dictatorship was consolidated rapidly during the following months. In
the famous
plebiscite of November 1933, the Nazi vote reported was more than 96 percent of the
total. The
end to effective resistance came in the Summer of 1934, approximately a year and a
half after
Schacht's orchestration of the coup d'etat against the von Schleicher government. This
consolidation of Hitler's personal power as a dictator, came in three developments:
1.) The "night of the long knives," the so-called Roehm purge, which eliminated
not only
potential challengers to Hitler from within the populist-based "brown shirts" of his
own party,
but also provided the occasion to assassinate a key target of Schacht's hatred, former
German
Chancellor and General Kurt von Schliecher.
2.) The convenient death, on Aug. 2, of President Paul von Hindenburg.
3.) Hitler's use of the occasion of President Hindenburg's death to supersede
the elective
position of President by Hitler's perpetual personal authority as {Fuehrer}.
Thus, on August 19, 1934 Hitler's dictatorship was consolidated. By the close of 1938,
with the
October march into Czechoslovakia, and the November "Crystal Night" against Jews in
Berlin,
Hitler was politically positioned to unleash a new world war.
Such are the disasters suffered by those people of a nation which tolerates the
sort of coup
d'etat being run now against the U.S. Constitution and President, a coup being run by
those
Republicans and others, who have stated their disposition to welcome the otherwise
unelectable
Al Gore immediately into the office of President.
- {Schacht and Gore} -
To speak with absolute objectivity, Al Gore personally is an ideologically
perverted,
wooden-headed fool, utterly lacking in visible cognitive intelligence, but with a sly
and viciously
backstabbing cowardice, nonetheless, a shameless tory fan of the British monarchy, and
crony
and bloody-handed accomplice of that Ramsay MacDonald-style fascist "mad bomber" Tony
Blair. Politically, he is thoroughly owned by the same crew which created his
political career,
those intimate circles of the British royal family, most notably the Duke of Edinburgh
and
Prince Charles, with whose pet peeves and perverted causes British lackey Gore became
associated through his patron and controller Armand Hammer.
What Gore is, personally, is essentially nothing. What he is, politically, is a
tool of such
others as do not flinch from soiling their hands by taking over, manipulating, and, in
time,
discarding, with equal shamelessness the same pathetic political creatures, such as
Gore, whom
they have not merely used, but used up. It is easy to have contempt for a Gore, but,
in himself,
he, like the village idiot and resident firebrand, while a significant public security
risk, is, like
any pathetic mental case, hardly deserving of such strong emotion as personal malice.
So, he is
being used by Henry A. Kissinger et al., just as Kissinger set up the President he
manipulated,
Richard Nixon, for self-destruction in the Watergate affair. If you recognize Gore as
the pathetic
bi-polar personality he is, you can readily understand how he is manipulated by
those, of the
likes of Henry Kissinger, who use him, as if he were a mere puppet on a string.
The Gore problem lies entirely in two matters. First, the strategic purpose for
which he, as a
mere dupe of his own pathetic ambitions, is being used. Second, the disgusting
corruption shown
by those, like a Clay T. Whitehead or cronies of the Henry A. Kissinger and Bush pack,
who
wittingly betray the United States itself in such ways as to put not only this nation,
but much of
the world at strategic risk. This is a risk so grave that no standard of comparison
from the earlier
experience of this century, even two World Wars, measures the sheer awfulness of the
treasonous
things those accomplices of the "secret committee" operations around Gore are doing.
On the Gore issue, it is thus time for Americans and others to face the kinds of
facts which the
German population of 1932-1933 refused to face. The comparison of the coup d'etat
around
Gore with the earlier case of Hitler, is not only justified; it is morally urgent that
that comparison
be made, far and wide, and loud and clear.
Gore must merely learn to play the Cheshire Cat for those childish occasions,
such as costume
parties, he finds most compatible with his limitations; let him, thus, fade, giggling
happily, but
quietly, from the scene. Blair, meanwhile, must be removed. Unless those two related
measures
are taken, no part of this planet will be safe for anyone much longer. All Hell is
about to bust
loose in the weeks just ahead. Wake up! Put Gore quietly into the background, and
Blair out of
the way of doing more harm than he has done, not only to Britain, but the world,
already.
Anyone who has yet to understand the importance of forcing through those two actions
now,
knows nothing of much importance about world events in progress today.
- 30-30-30 -
