-Caveat Lector-

>From what I understand Many organizations realize that
there are things that will contribute to AIDS, ADD, ADHD,
and Diabetes.  This draft not only covers those that have
obvious reactions to things but as a (possible) leap board
to regulate the drug/chemical industry.  Called pharmasudical
but they also make many of the chemicals that we spread on our
lawns and farmers spread on the crops.  In trying to get out of
this (some) are trying to say that they can do these things
with genetics instead.  This might allow the labeling of genetically
modified food in the supermarket as well.  Why?  If the EPA and
the FDA get together they if people react to something then
it will be able to be regulated.  Think of Peanuts.  Yet if this goes

through without enough comments, that potential may be down the
drain.  My web page is cut and paste (on purpose) so that it is
easily printed and all links will show.  Take what you need but the
essays are mine.  Will put in something about the fact that I will
allow
them to be used for research purposes.  I eventually want to make
some
money from writing, but I am too busy with this to even apply
anyplace.
Any way that is why all the essays will be on other pages.  I will
endeavor to
keep the main page for information and research only.  If anyone sees

something that seems to be off line on the main page - please drop me
a
line because even once the deadline for this draft is done, the work
has just started.
Laura
aka The Pied Piper

*****Forwarded*****
Hi everyone,
Seems like eons since I have had the company of the list.  I had
terminal
problems with my NEW Micron computer and after much discussion they
have
replaced the defective one.  If MSN can handle the email from the
list I
should be up and going again.

I have reviewed the ATSDR REPORT and the responses on enviroknow and
notice
that no one is responding to the bullet that will kill--that is--
RISK/BENEFIT at the end of the report.  This very deadly line has
allowed
endangered species to drift into extinction, and that would include
the
chemically poisoned/injured.  When the government slaps this
designation
on
ANYTHING it is a death sentence and would require that over 51% of
the
population be officially recognized to be affected negatively by
chemicals
in order for anything to be done.  Currently, the deck is stacked
(erroneously) toward the BENEFIT of chemicals.  After Vietnam's Agent

Orange
and Gulf War Syndrome and the resultant warfare waged by the Pentagon

against its own personnel, who are considered as acceptable costs of
waging
war (chemically injured humans/other creatures are considered
acceptable
costs of "doing business in america"), one can conclude that our
pleas for
justice fall on a soul-less government's deaf ears.

My graduate degrees are in environmental philosophy and the study of
environmental degradation on humans.  Perhaps the public at large is
not
aware of the dangers of the RISK/BENEFIT paradigm.  The RISK/BENEFIT
paradigm is invoked to insure a win, and though it deliberately takes
up a
very small part of the Report, it carries the most weight.  In order
to
defeat the R/B paradigm, the scales must tip to more people being
recognized
at RISK from chemicals and unfortunately the uninformed public
prances
around in their usual delusional brain fog that any danger exists and
that
the FDA, EPA, and other LMNOP's will warn us of problems.  Dream
on.   The
chemical poisoners spend billions to lull the masses into a false
sense of
security regarding their products.   It is odd that illnesses such as
AIDS
are known worldwide, and are indeed very horrendous, but AIDS pales
in
ubiquity to MCS or however the "THEY" have chosen to label chemical
poisoning.  In a just society the public is warned of "clear and
present"
dangers--but in our society we are told that the public should not be

"alarmed."

If anyone would like to join me in a response that addresses the R/B
part
of
the report let me know.  I am sickened by the medical professions,
governmental agencies, and chemical manufacturers refusal to address
our
rights to the "pursuit of life liberty and happiness"  many of us
have
lost
all three.  Our civil rights are being violated and perhaps we need
to
address this issue from another angle--my 27 years of chemically
destoryed
life has taught me which battles to fight wherein at least I may have
a
chance to be victorious and try to live the rest of my life in a
fashion
other than fight for survival.

Mad Mag
*****End of Forwarded*****
To any that are intrested these links are at the top
of my home page and the draft closes
on the 15 of Dec.
Laura
--
****
my ICQ# 14484977
Education: A House of Mirrors
http://members.xoom.com/ThePiedPiper/Intro2.htm
Legislation and what we are allowing by Letting our
children be labeled as only ADD or ADHD
http://www.cec.sped.org/faq/gt-ld.htm (New 16 Oct 98)

3) Uncover Myths in Education
    Myth 1 That Home Schoolers Need to be under the
    Umbrella of a Church or Religious Group.
    http://www.home-ed-press.com/INF/FREE/hsinfo_far1.html
**
1. Take the 60-day No Aspartame Test and send us your case history.
Mission Possible International
5950-H State Bridge Rd. #215
Duluth, GA 30097 USA
2. Tell your doctor and all of your friends!
3. Return Asparcidal food to the store.
(anything with Monsanto's
NutraSweet/Equal/Spoonful/Benevia/NatraTaste)
VISIT http://www.dorway.com/possible.html Get links to over 30 sites
VISIT http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame/   ..FAQs & Cases
VISIT http://www.notmilk.com Exposing Bovine Growth Hormone
Disability and Death are not acceptable costs of business!

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to