-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/15/99 6:25:51 PM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> I think we've already been through this--with millions and millions of
> dollars of Scaiffe money--not to mention 40 million dollars of taxpayer
money.
> All these millions have been directed at digging up dirt on Clinton. While
more and >more American children
If Scaiffe money is a big concern, then surely you share the same concern
about
liberal publishers and writers who write articles which suposedly "attack
Republicans
and conservatives." Likewise I am sure it bothered you when Lawrence Walsh
spent 47 plus million dollars investigating Ronald Reagan....and in his final
report he concluded that Reagan did not lie under oath.
We must not forget about the Democrats spending 20 plus million
investigating
the alleged Reagan/Casey Oct 1980 surprise. That was when Speaker of the
House
Tip O Neal said 'the fact that the accusation has been made justifys the
investigation..and any amount of money spent during said investigation.' The
results
of that was that the Democrats concluded nothing happened.
Thats just to name but 2 of many.
The truth simply is that when a Democratic President is being investigated,
the Democrats and liberals howl. When a Republican President is being
investigated
the Republicans and conservatives howl.
For all you Democrats and Liberals who truly *believe* that money spent
on investigating the wrong doing of a President should be spent on other
things, I would expect that you will be the first ones to say the same thing
when the Democrats are investigating a Republican President down the road
some day. Don't be two faced about it either even though the President may
not
be "your guy."
> are growing up in poverty....and more and more working American families
> have no health care. Just like the good ol' 50s, except now it takes two
or three
> working adults to provide a non-living wage.
President Clinton tells us that this is the GREATEST peace time economy in
the
history of America, how people are working making real money for a change,
how unemployment is down and on and on. If you believe what your President is
telling
you, then there are no problems.
Of course he is the same guy that waved his finger in the press conference
in january of 1999 and said 'I did not have sex..with that woman..Monica
Lewinsky.'
So I can understand why you may be reluctant to believe that the United
States is better off then its ever been in 50 years.
I would point out one thing about health care and all the so called good
times
of long ago. I had many family members and people I knew who worked in the
40s through now who have told me there was no private health care benifits to
speak of until the 70s. According to them, when you got sick and didn't come
to work, you didn't get paid. If you had to have surgery, and were off 2
weeks you didn't get paid. One person worked for the Union Pacific railroad
as a conductor and as everybody knows Union UP health benifits are some of the
best in the business. He told me that it wasn't until the 70s before he got
health insurance, sick leave and such...and that was a union job.
He was one of many who told me when you got sick and didn't go to work, you
didn't
get paid.
Apparently it came about because employers were dangling benifits as a
method of keeping skilled workers. Well low and behold many other companys
got
on the band wagon and now everybody expects health insurance and all the other
things. Sadly we are going back to the "good old days" of the 40s-70s where
employers did not pay for health care and other benifits.
<snip>
> I'm getting concerned that this list is leaning so heavily to the right.
And
> I hear that David Duke--the Grand Old Wizard--will be running for Congress,
I would point out that under the Democratic/liberal definition of morality
David Duke would be considered a moral man as long as he was true to
political issues.
Did you see the news report about the 47 Democrats who were card carrying
members of the alleged white supremist group that the liberals excoriated
Trent Lott about? Interestingly no liberals/Democrats have stepped forward to
denounce those 47.
Cheers,
Robert
Cheers,
Robert
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
