-Caveat Lector-
Russia: Analysis From Washington -- Why Don't Russians Rebel?
By Paul Goble
Washington, 13 January 1999 (RFE/RL) -- Russia's enormous economic and
political difficulties over the past several years have prompted many there
and elsewhere to ask -- why don't more Russians go on strike or engage in
political demonstrations?
A new U.S. Information Agency report, "Who Protests in Russia," both reports
how few Russians have taken part in such protests and provides at least part
of the answer as to why.
Based on extensive polling in Russia over the last few years, the report says
that only seven percent of Russians claim that they have taken part in any
political rally or demonstration, and only four percent have gone on strike.
The report further suggests that the number of Russians prepared to engage in
such protests has been declining.
And it explains these figures by suggesting that overwhelming majorities of
Russians do not take part in such protests because they do not believe that
either economic actions or political demonstrations will in the end do them
any good.
But the report's focus on those who do protest calls attention to three
factors which could mean that this trend will be reversed, leading more
Russians to take part in strikes and demonstrations over the next few years,
and thus, to challenge existing power relations in Russian economic and
political life.
First, as the report shows, those Russians who feel personally desperate, who
have not been paid for extensive periods and who lack alternative sources of
support are far more likely to protest than those who do not. Up to now,
many Russians have refrained from doing so either because they did not
think protests would work, because they still felt they had something to
lose, or because they could turn to family and friends for support.
But if conditions deteriorate, as now seems likely, and if people learn about
strike actions or public protests, then ever more Russians will fall into this
"personal desperation" and thus, may take to the streets.
Second, according to the USIA report, Russians who are members of a trade
union or are active supporters of one or another political party are far more
likely to participate in demonstrations than those who do not.
Over the last three years, the presence of a trade union in a workplace "more
than doubles" the likelihood that those employed there will participate in
strikes or other forms of protest.
And during the same period, those who report "a great deal" of interest in
politics are almost eight times as likely to participate in strikes or
protests than those who say they have "no interest at all."
On the one hand, this pattern suggests that strikes may become more likely as
political parties try to use trade unions in order to reach more voters. So
far that has not happened very often. Thus, the report notes that only six
percent of employed Russians now say that a member of the Russian Communist
Party member has asked them to join a protest.
And, on the other, it implies that as more Russians focus on politics during
the upcoming parliamentary and presidential elections, an increasing number of
them are likely to participate in public demonstrations.
That will be particularly likely, the USIA study suggests, if Russian
political parties run campaigns that seek to identify who is to blame for
Russia's current predicament. That is because Russians who think they know
"who is to blame" are far more likely to protest than those who do not.
Moreover, because of the overlap, the USIA polls found that between those who
protest for economic reasons and those who do so for political ones, any
increase in economic protests could spark an increase in political protests,
and vice versa.
And third, as the USIA report notes, the roughly 7.5 million Russians who
have
participated in protests over the last several years may see their numbers
grow if additional Russians working in jobs they consider strategically
important are able to successfully challenge the authorities and win
concessions or at least back pay.
Consequently, as the Russian government and Russian firms attempt to live up
to their promises to pay back wages, workers who have not yet received them
may seek to use strikes to catch up with those who have. And that in turn
could lead to an explosive cycle that the authorities might find difficult to
contain.
None of this is to say that Russia is about to face a tidal wave of strikes
and political demonstrations. Rather it is to note that the passivity many
Russians have displayed up to now is the product of specific experiences and
calculations, just as much as it reflects some underlying national culture.
And thus, it is to suggest that as in the past, the quiescence the Russians
now display could end more quickly and explosively than many observers now
predict.
--
"And it came to pass that in the last days catatonics
roamed the earth, and great monsters ruled the masses."
---------------- Joshua II ----------------
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
