-Caveat Lector-
-----Original Message-----
From: Walt Horning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics,dc.politics,alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater,alt.fan.rush-
limbaugh,alt.impeach.clinton,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.gossip,alt.fe
minism
Date: Sunday, January 31, 1999 8:57 AM
Subject: IS BILL CLINTON A RAPIST???? (new evidence) (u)
>Here are some details of the allegations of sexual assault and rape by
>Bill Clinton of nine women. Sources: NBC, ABC, Wash Post, AP,
>FreeRepublic, Drudge, "Partners in Power" (Roger Morris)
>
>(1) JULIA BROADDRICK -- RAPE --
>
>NBC national news on Saturday, March 28, 1998:
>
>"The explosive new allegation tonight is that President Clinton
>sexually assaulted a woman 20 years ago in Arkansas. It involves an
>alleged encounter at this Little Rock hotel in the late 1970s, between
>then Attorney General Bill Clinton and campaign worker, Juanita
>Broaddrick. In court documents today, Jones' lawyers claim Clinton
>quote 'forcibly raped and sexually assaulted' Broaddrick, then quote
>"bribed and intimidated her" to remain silent. Sources say that
>Broaddrick, now 54, recently denied under oath that such an assault
>occurred. But Jones' lawyers claim she had told their investigator she
>had suffered a quote 'horrible thing' at the hand of Clinton, and did
>not want to relive it. And NBC NEWS has talked to FOUR people from
>Arkansas who say Broaddrick told them of such an assault years ago.
>
>Today's charge is largely based on a letter from this man, Philip
>Yoakum, a friend and business associate of the alleged victim. In a
>letter to Broaddrick, written in 1992, Yoakum, a Republican writes, I
>was particularly distraught when you told me of your brutal rape by
>Bill Clinton, how he bit your lip until you gave into his forcing sex
>upon you.' In an interview with NBC NEWS, Yoakum said Broaddrick told
>him that Clinton invited himself to her hotel room, allegedly to
>discuss her nursing home business.
>
>Reporter: She told you in 1981 that Bill Clinton assaulted her?
>
>Mr. PHILLIP YOAKUM (Arkansas Businessman): Mm-hm. Yes, 1981 is when
>she told me.
>
>Reporter: Did you believe her at the time?
>
>Mr. YOAKUM: I believed her.
>
>MYERS: Yoakum admits he is no fan of the president and that he
>unsuccessfully tried to get Broaddrick to tell her story when Clinton
>first ran for president.
>
>Mr. YOAKUM: And she says, Who would believe me, little old Juanita
>from Van Buren?'
>
>MYERS: There was another woman at that hotel that day, a nurse and
>friend of Broaddrick who says she iced her friend's face after the
>assault. In a telephone interview with NBC News, this woman, who
>admits she dislikes Clinton, said Broaddrick was distraught, her lips
>were swollen at least double in size. She told me they had intercourse
>against her will.' Again a White House spokesman dismissed the charge
>as outrageous, false, and the work of the president's long-time
>political opponents.' The White House also noted that Broaddrick
>herself already denied the allegation under oath. Tonight, Broaddrick
>had no comment.
>
>(ABC, AP, Drudge and Wash Post some or all of the above.)
>
>After Broaddrick reported this did not happen in an avidavit in the
>Jones case, Drudge reported on Dec 27, 1998 that Ken Starr gave her
>full immunity from prosecution for filing the false avidavit, at which
>time she told Ken Starr about the incident, and broke down in tears
>over it.
>
>So, there is Broaddrick's own testimony, plus that of FOUR witnesses,
>one of whom personally put the ice pack on her swollen lip.
>
>http://www.ishius.com/broaddri.htm click on ABC report. NBC pulled
>their hyperlink.
>
>http://www.dallasnews.com/clintoncrisis/crisis232.htm (Broaddrick is
>mentioned only)
>
>http://www.dallasnews.com/clintoncrisis/crisis157.htm (some details)
>
>http://reports.guardian.co.uk/papers/19980401-02.html (little details)
>
>FLASH: NBC news crew filmed Broaddrick at her home, just a week or so
>agon and its reported that she feared what would happen, now that she
>reported to NBC the truth about the rape.
>
>---
>
>(2) JANE DONE #? -- RAPE --
>
>"A young woman lawyer in Little Rock claimed that she was
>accosted by Clinton while he was attorney general and that when
>she recoiled he forced himself on her, biting and bruising her.
>Deeply affected by the assault, the woman decided to keep it all
>quiet for the sake of her own hard won career and that of her
>husband. When the husband later saw Clinton at the 1980
>Democratic Convention, he delivered a warning. �If you ever
>approach her,' he told the governor, 'I'll kill you.' Not even seeing
>fit to deny the incident, Bill Clinton sheepishly apologized and duly
>promised never to bother her again." [page 238, "Partners in
>Power� (Roger Morris)]
>
>---
>
>(3) KATHLEEN WILLEY -- SEXUAL ASSAULT --
>
>There were two witnesses to what happened to Willey: Linda Tripp
>and a Ms Steele. Ms Steele reported the story to Newsweek per Willey's
>request. Ms Steele claimed later that Willey said she was lying but
>asked her to tell Newsweek about the assault anyway. She also clained
>she told Newsweek it was off the record. Newsweek and Ms Steele are
>engaged in a lawsuit over what was actually said. If you saw Ms
>Steele's lawyer on TV, you would think that Ms Steele is now lying.
>Why? Ms Steele's lawyer starting lashing out at Ken Starr and
>defending Bill Clinton. In otherwords, instead of being a lawyer
>representing Ms Steele in a lawsuit, the lawyer had her own
>"political" agenda, making it suspect that Ms Steele is lying now,
>also for political reasons, or possibly due to threats or bribery.
>
>As evidence that Steele is lying, Starr has indicted her for her lying
>to FBI agents and before a grand jury. Obviously he had more evidence
>than you and I have seen.
>
>Linda Tripp said she heard Kathleen tell the story about the president
>groping her and making her feel his erect penis. When the story came
>out, Bob Bennett, the lawyer representing Clinton in the Paula Jones
>lawsuit, immediately said, "Linda Tripp is a liar and not to be
>believed." Well, Linda fearing perjury charges, loss of security
>clearance, and loss of job, taped Monica Lewinsky so that if she were
>asked to tell the truth for the Paula Jones case, she'd have taped
>conversations to defend herself against perjury allegations, since
>Clinton and Lewinsky were both posed to lie in the Jones depositions.
>
>Further proof the president groped Kathleen Willey are taped
>conversations where Lewinsky urges Tripp to lie about the Kathleen
>Willey incident and to of course lie about Lewinsky too. Finally, the
>"talking points" that Lewinsky gave Tripp, told Tripp how to lie about
>Lewinsky, but also Willey.
>
>Now it would make perfect sense for Lewinsky to ask Tripp to lie about
>only herself, but to ask Tripp to also lie about Kathleen Willey?
>What's Lewinsky's interest in this lie? She is not the one allegedly
>groped. If the allegation is true, then its really in the interest of
>Bill Clinton to perpetrate this lie. Well if its a lie, what is the
>opposite, but the truth? And that is that Bill Clinton groped Kathleen
>Willey, but still an allegation.
>
>From there, with tapes turned over to Starr, the investigation started
>and you know the rest.
>
>But there are two pieces of other evidence, related to Nathan Landow.
>First, its factual that Willey attended a party hosted by Landow. At
>that party, Willey claims Landow tried to get her to lie about Clinton
>groping her. As added evidence Landow pleaded the 5th before Starr's
>grand jury, and he pleaded the 5th before the House Judiciary
>Committee when asked about the intimidation.
>
>Finally, and most recently, ABC learned that Landow had hired a
>private investigator to investigate Willey. If the president was
>"innocent" of groping Willey, then such action is unnecessary. The
>P.I.'s name is Jared Stern. It has been learned that he alleges that
>Landow instructed him not just to investigate Willey, but to
>intimidate her into silence with threats of bodily harm. This could
>amount to conspiracy, obstruction of justice and assault (the threat).
>
>Why would Landow want Willey intimidated? To keep her silent before
>Ken Starr. What does this mean? It means that possibly Landow, with
>Clinton's knowledge, attempted to tamper with a witness (witness
>tampering) attempted to obstruct justice, and attempted to threaten a
>person with bodily harm (assault).
>
>http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/PoliticalNation/pn_990129.html
>
>---
>
>(4) PAULA JONES -- SEXUAL HARASSMENT --
>
>You know about Paula Jones. Oddly, a woman who was engaged to a state
>trooper who guarded Clinton when he was governor, was probably
>murdered, though they ruled in suicide. He later killed himself too.
>Did these persons have knowledge of the Paula Jones assault? The
>trooper was a guard of Clinton's at the time of the Paula Jones
>incident.
>
>Clinton's settlement is a de facto admission of guilt, albeit not in
>the legal sense, but practically speaking. Nonetheless, Jones "wins",
>and thus Clinton probably did what Jones said he did otherwise he
>should not have paid her off.
>
>---
>
>(5) ELIZABETH WARD -- RAPE --
>
>Elizabeth Ward was in the Washington Post. There are some
>allegations of a "date-rape". Later she claimed it was consensual. But
>she first told her friends that Bill Clinton, as governor, attacked
>her and forced himself on her.
>
>Elizabeth Ward Gracen, former Miss America, against testifying for
>Paula Jones that she had sexual affair with Clinton in 1983.
>http://www.nypost.com/news/6138.htm
>
>Did Clinton threats keep her from pressing charges?
>
>---
>
>(6) "JANE DOE #?" -- SEXUAL ASSAULT --
>
>This Jane Doe alleged groping only.
>
>---
>
>(7) CRISTY ZERCHER -- SEXUAL ASSAULT --
>
>Cristy Zercher was reported in several papers and on TV. She alleges
>that on an airplane flight the president groped her while others were
>asleep.
>
>---
>
>(8) KATHY BRADSHAW -- ASSAULT --
>
>Kathy Bradshaw was abused and she told a friend. She was subpoenaed in
>the Paula Jones case.
>
>---
>
>(9) DEBBY -- ASSAULT --
>
>Debby was a prostitute. She was badly beaten. Arkansas state troopers
>had to pull Clinton off of her. She was subpoenaed in the Paula Jones
>case.
>
>---
>
>I may have muddled a few details, perhaps, and these are of course all
>allegations (except for the Jones settlement, which is a de facto
>admission of sexual harassment). Clinton deserves to be treated,
>legally speaking, as innocent before proven guilty. But the problem I
>have is, if it were just 1-2 women, I'd even be skeptical, but there
>are at least nine sex crimes and one child!!! Its just too many and
>there is too much corroboration, something like over 20 witnesses.
>
>
>--------
>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
