-Caveat Lector-

 from:  http://www.chronicillnet.org/online/bensweet.html

 THE POLIO VACCINE AND SIMIAN VIRUS 40 AFTER THIRTY YEARS
 ---------------------------------------------------------
 Prominent Polio Vaccine Researcher Confirms
 Suspicions About Monkey-Virus Contamination
 -------------------------------------------
 By T.J. Moriarty - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

     "This new virus represents the detection for the first time
     of a hitherto "non-detectable" simian virus of monkey renal
     cultures and raises the important question of the existence
     of other such viruses.  All three types of Sabin's live
     polio virus vaccine were contaminated."

     "Even the people who received a killed polio virus vaccine
     could have been infected.  Those papers we wrote were incorrect
     at the time, stating that formalin killed vaccines were free
     of simian SV40 virus.  But the new information regarding the
     killed ones was never published."  By then it was too late.

     ...competition between the Salk (killed) and Sabin (live)
     formulas.  Despite common knowledge, both Salk and Sabin were
     definitely contaminated.  The Salk vaccine had already
     garnered prestigious appeal as a "safe vaccine".

     ...the authors estimate somewhere between 10-30 million people
     of the 98 million injected were exposed to at least SV40.
     [ "Human Exposure to SV40 : Review and Comment" by Shah and
     Nathanson, Journal of Epidemiology, January 1976 ]

     ...current polio vaccines are still grown on African Green
     monkey tissues.

     "Is it only a coincidence that HIV infection manifested itself
     at the same time as the introduction of vaccines that are now
     known to have been contaminated with simian viruses?"
     [ "The Polio Vaccine and the Origin of AIDS" by
     Dr. R. Stricker, Medical Hypothesis, January 1994 ]

     "Who is minding the public health when the FDA allows drug
     companies to produce vaccines grown on animal tissue cultures
     and they don't even know if this practice is facilitating cross
     species transfer of animal viruses into man?"

 Over the past fifteen or more years, the immune system has been
 increasingly more challenged.  Indefensible disorders such as AIDS
 and HIV as well as conditions like Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS)
 and Persian Gulf War-Related Illnesses are the new epidemics of the
 Silicon Age.  By comparison, the days of polio and small pox
 epidemics seem crudely forgiving when we consider that today's
 viral mutants repeatedly outsmart gains made in vaccine development.

 However, it seems the days of polio are still with us -- not in the
 form of acute viral outbreaks of fever and paralysis -- but in the
 "uncharted" data on the long-term effects from the simian (monkey)
 viral contaminated polio vaccines given to countless children and
 adults three decades ago.  Even more, what other "undetectable"
 monkey viruses have been transmitted in the vaccine batches of
 late?  These unanswered questions continue to resurface in today's
 research and still riddle retired scientist Ben Sweet.  "No one
 really knows if there are any dangers, but no scientist can
 definitively say there aren't any, that is what's scary," says
 Sweet.

 As a senior research scientist for a major pharmaceutical company
 from 1959 to 1964, Dr. Sweet was one of those responsible for the
 research, development and field testing of the killed respiratory
 virus vaccine.


 Contaminated Polio Vaccines

 Scientific literature states that some polio vaccines given between
 1955 and 1961 may have contained low-levels of live monkey viruses.
 As many as 26 of the simian contaminants were readily detected but
 still other viruses, like SV40 slipped past rigorous quality
 control testing procedures available at that time.  The simian
 viruses were inadvertently introduced into the vaccine pool because
 the polio virus was grown in monkey (Rhesus, Patas, or Cynomolgus)
 kidney cells.

 In his 1960 paper, "The Vacuolating Virus : SV40" Sweet and
 co-author M.R. Hilleman write, "This new virus represents the
 detection for the first time of a hitherto "non-detectable" simian
 virus of monkey renal cultures and raises the important question of
 the existence of other such viruses.  All three types of Sabin's
 live polio virus vaccine were contaminated."

 Dr. Sweet told Chronic Illnet about the alarm that circulated
 around the discovery of the SV40 virus in 1960, "It was a
 frightening discovery because, back then, it was not possible to
 detect the virus with the testing procedures we had.  It only
 showed up in the cells of the African Green monkeys -- the species
 being used exclusively by our company.  We had no idea of what this
 virus would do thirty years ago."

 Sweet says there were two things that the research team had
 determined:  "First, we knew that SV40 had oncogenic properties
 (cancer-causing) in hamsters which was bad news.  Secondly, we
 found out that it hybridized with certain DNA viruses -- like adeno
 virus -- such that the adeno virus would then have SV40 genes
 attached to it.  We couldn't clean up the adeno virus vaccine seed
 stocks grown in monkey kidney cells only".  The seed stocks
 apparently were always contaminated but the vaccines were still
 administered.


 Confusion Surrounding the "Killed" Vaccine

 Possibly the most unsettling part of his research that he carries
 with him thirty years later, is knowing that an untold number of
 people (possibly in the 10's of millions) were exposed with this
 virus whether they were given the "live" or "killed" polio vaccine.

 "Even the people who received a killed polio virus vaccine could
 have been infected.  Those papers we wrote were incorrect at the
 time, stating that formalin killed vaccines were free of simian
 SV40 virus.  But the new information regarding the killed ones
 was never published," he added.  By then it was too late.  These
 findings came after the mass inoculations with the polio vaccine.

 The distinction between "live" and "killed" vaccines is a critical
 one.  The scientific community and the American public was told
 that "killed" vaccines were undoubtedly safe because formalin was
 used to destroy any contaminating simian virus.  The thirty-nine
 or so simian viruses prior to SV40, were probably inactivated with
 formalin, but not SV40.  The virus eluded the virus-killing
 behavior of formalin.  This now meant even the "killed" vaccines
 unintentionally contained small amounts of active virus.  "So it's
 a likely possibility that a some of those individuals injected with
 supposedly inactivated adeno virus vaccines that had the SV40
 contaminant or SV40/adeno hybrid could also be producing antibodies
 to it."

 Due to the molecular "kinetics" of virus inactivation, Sweet and
 other researchers believe other viruses -- similar to SV40 -- could
 also have been present in the vaccines if they too could circumvent
 formalin inactivation.

 There were specific laboratory difficulties associated with adeno
 virus -- now carrying an attached form of SV40.  Sweet describes,
 "When we started growing the vaccines, we just couldn't get rid of
 the SV40-contaminated virus.  We tried to neutralize it, but
 couldn't.  Either adeno or SV40 would come out down the line."

 Chronic Illnet:  What were you thinking at the time when you
 realized people were being exposed to SV40 about the long-term
 effects, considering we're still in the dark?

 Sweet:  "We really didn't think about it until we found out it was
 oncogenic and now, with the theoretical links to HIV and cancer,
 it just blows my mind."

 Chronic Illnet:  Was there any temptation to just scrap the whole
 project, make an announcement and move on?"

 Sweet:  "Sabin and, more specifically, Salk vaccines were already
 widely in use by then.  We were, of course, always worried about
 possible vaccine contaminants present because we didn't know what
 these monkey cell cultures were carrying.  We were always worried
 about encountering a new, undescribed virus. Always.  When we found
 out there were viruses present in the Rhesus- cynomolgus monkey
 systems, and the possibility that each monkey assay system was
 different from another, the temptation was there to transfer the
 studies to another system.  But it was too late to switch gears and
 start using raccoon or chicken systems, because then you could be
 dealing with another whole set of viruses."

 Chronic Illnet:  What was the political climate?

 Sweet:  "You had to be careful, very careful.  When the virus
 appeared oncogenic in hamsters, we wanted to do tests to determine
 if it caused malignant transformation of normal cells in culture.
 In reality, we did not although an outside agency confirmed the
 findings."

 Sweet also described another inherent problem in vaccine
 development -- the controversy and competition between the Salk
 (killed) and Sabin (live) formulas.  Despite common knowledge,
 both Salk and Sabin were definitely contaminated.  The Salk vaccine
 had already garnered prestigious appeal as a "safe vaccine".


 Long-term Studies Encouraged Three Decades Ago

 In his 1960 paper, Sweet, et al. stressed the need for studies on
 the long-term effects on humans to determine the pathogenicity of
 these agents for man.  "When the 'contaminated' vaccines were
 released, we really felt confident patients needed a substantially
 higher level of infectious SV40 and/or they had to receive multiple
 shots to elevate the body's viral count high enough to cause the
 harm."  To some, the term "contaminated" carries with it an intent
 of malice, but Dr. Sweet says this is clearly not the case.  Sweet
 noted that persons fed live SV40 contaminated polio virus vaccine
 orally, or inactivated Salk-type vaccine intramuscularly, showed
 strong evidence of antibody production to polio viruses.  In
 additon, the vaccine recipients were not showing significant
 harmful effects or antibody production, in the short term, to SV40
 -- which was encouraging.  "Less concerning long-terms effects
 could be noted," he says.

 At the time of the discovery of the human exposure to SV40, there
 was no evidence that the virus was present or active in vaccine
 recipients.  In recent years, however, SV40 has been isolated in
 human tissue, two from the brains of patients with PML (progressive
 multifocal leukoencephalopathy) and another from a metastatic
 melanoma patient.  Results of this study appeared in the paper
 "Human Exposure to SV40 : Review and Comment" by Shah and Nathanson
 in the Journal of Epidemiology in January of 1976.  Important from
 that report is the only definitive origin of where human exposure
 came from, "With the exception of viral vaccines, no pharmaceutical
 product intended for human use requires the use of simian
 cultures."  Based on their interpretations, the authors estimate
 somewhere between 10-30 million people of the 98 million injected
 were exposed to at least SV40.


 Today's Polio Vaccine Research -- Long-Term Effects

 To date, the polio vaccine has been administered to an estimated
 ninety-seven percent of children in the United States.

 Although there are no "proven" scientific facts about the possible
 perils of contaminated or even "purified" polio vaccines, there are
 a handful of credible researchers with theories too intriguing and
 carefully outlined to disregard.  Their theories, if proven, may
 offer a new link in conquering the immunodeficiency diseases of
 this century.

 Microbiologist Howard Urnovitz is one member of a team who believes
 many of today's "new" syndromes like Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Gulf
 War-Related Illnesses and even HIV have, "some association with the
 possible contaminants in the vaccine."  He says we may be paying
 the price for "prevention" years later, as the uncertainty about
 the effects on our immune system from the vaccine continues to
 unfold.


 Was SIV Also Present?

 Is There an Evolution of HIV from the Vaccines ?

 There is also a concern whether another virus of primate origin --
 Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV) -- could also have been present
 in the original vaccines.  That possibility cannot be ruled out.
 But only testing of the original polio vaccine samples and seed
 stocks would give a reliable or closely definitive answer.  Sweet
 stressed the need for studies on the original simian isolates and
 the antisera prepared against them and their possible relationship
 to SIV.  At this point, future studies may be lost due to the
 impossibility of retrieving such samples.

 At the 8th Annual Houston Conference on AIDS, Urnovitz suggests
 that HIV-1 may have also originated from the contaminated polio
 vaccines through the recombination with normal human genes.
 "It is very likely that HIV-1 may have been a result, and that it
 may in fact be a monkey-human hybrid.  His theory states that the
 contaminating viruses have "archived" themselves in the body's
 nerve tissue.  These virus fragments then resurface at a later date
 when the immune system becomes challenged.  An opportunistic
 infection or exposure to toxins could be the "trigger" that
 stimulates the reappearance of these virus fragments.

 "This virus 'archiving' could be igniting the symptoms of central
 nervous system disorders, chronic fatigue and joint pain that have
 been linked to more than a dozen unexplained epidemics," he added.

 Dr. R. Stricker's paper entitled "The Polio Vaccine and the Origin
 of AIDS" that appeared in the January 1994 edition of Medical
 Hypothesis is yet another theory highlighting a potential link.
 Stricker states, "The transfer of monkey viruses to man via
 vaccines is particularly relevant to AIDS since the causative agent
 HIV, is thought to be derived from a simian precursor virus."  He
 says the evolution of HIV remains to be proven but is nonetheless
 startling, "Is it only a coincidence that HIV infection manifested
 itself at the same time as the introduction of vaccines that are
 now known to have been contaminated with simian viruses?"

 The collection of theories on the origins, pathways and the sheer
 number of potential "victims" from the contaminated vaccines is
 certainly unsettling.  Although each theory has its own individual
 elements, a cohesion exists:  The cross-species cultivation of
 vaccines is clearly laden with risks -- risks that may be
 irreversible, carrying consequences too great to endure.  But to
 what extent, if any, irreparable damage has been inflicted upon
 humanity is still blurry.

 For consumer activist Barbara Loe Fisher, co-Founder & president
 of the National Vaccine Information Web Site, the fact that the
 original vaccines were contaminated and current polio vaccines are
 still grown on African Green monkey tissues, is just one more
 indication that government vaccine officials have created dangerous
 public health policies without making sure they have the solid
 science to back them up.

 "Who is minding the public health when the FDA allows drug
 companies to produce vaccines grown on animal tissue cultures and
 they don't even know if this practice is facilitating cross species
 transfer of animal viruses into man?" says Fisher.

 Highlighting the fact that American parents are legally required
 to vaccinate their babies with 10 different viral and bacterial
 vaccines, Fisher warns, "No one really knows the latent, long term
 effects on the human immune and neurological systems.  With 200
 vaccines in the research pipeline, more than 100 in clinical trials
 and scores on the brink of being licensed, vaccine research had
 better get back to the basic science before another AIDS epidemic
 is created in a vaccine lab."


 For more information on this topic, refer to the highlighted
 phrases for hyperlinked information and additional sources.

 see:  http://www.chronicillnet.org/online/bensweet.html




.

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to