-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 99-02-02 14:53:02 EST, you write:
> I might agree with this, at least in part, but it would depend upon what it
> is you wanted to discuss. Let us say for the sake of argument that I am a
> shill for the government and that my being an editor of CTRL enables me to
stifle
> unwanted discussion. Do you propose to just come on list and fling
personal
> invective against me? If that is what you want to discuss then go
somewhere
> else. Even if I were an agent and controlling content this is still not
the
> place to be engaging in personal attacks. Post arguments based on what I
> have
> said to illustrate your contention and allow me an opportunity to respond
to
> your claims, without the personal crap. This is all said just
> hypothetically
> of course, because I'm not an agent of anybody (Of course some of you MAY
> believe otherwise.). One more thing that is important. There are certain
> guidelines that this list has, PERIOD. If the discussion of control of the
> list and it's possible conspiratorial angles leads into more nazi
propaganda
> and Holocaust denial then it too has no place being discussed here. Lastly
> my
> comments must fall by the wayside in light of whatever ruling Kris makes on
> a
> matter of discussion. I am just and editor, he OWNS the list. They are
his
> rules (which I mostly agree with anyway) and they are rules that must be
> obeyed, period. As to what can be discussed I leave it up to him and will
> abide by his decisions, hell he has even castigated me for getting to
> personal
> in my responses to others on this list so I am not immune to being whacked
> when appropriate. I don't blindly accept his pronouncements either, we
> differ
> on some issues, but in the end it is his list and he can do with it as he
> pleases, and if I or anybody else doesn't like it we can all unsubscribe
and
> go elsewhere.
> Teo1000
>
Posting arguments based on what a person says or doesn't *allow* to be
said is all *I* am interested in. I said nothing about personal invective and
I agree it doesn't belong on the list. Sheesh.
To restate: it seems fair and germiane to discuss the possibility that
list owners or moderators might have an agenda as per their list control
behavior. The only reference made to CTRL list owner was to "please" allow
such discussions to take place.
Samantha <~~~wondering what will be read between THESE lines
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
