-Caveat Lector-
J FROST wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> One writes:
>
> The Drug War is marketed as the only way to "save our children." Yet,
> eighty
> years into the most protracted and expensive experiment in Prohibition in
> history, illicit drugs are more available on the streets, on our
> playgrounds,
> and in our school yards than ever. What are the real consequences of
> these
> disastrous policies? Click on any topic at right to learn more about
> what's
> gone wrong, and how we can fix it.
>
> Prohibition is the problem. You can be part of the solution. Join DRCNet
> today, and SAY NO to the Drug War -- your voice makes a difference.
> drug-related HIV/AIDS and needle exchange
> kids and the drug war
> chronic pain management
> people of color and the drug war
> drug treatment
> medicinal marijuana
> more coming soon!
> ===================================================
> Why not make robbery, rape and murder legal.
> ///
> Because those are crimes against persons...I am arguing for
> decriminalizing victimless crimes...
> \\\
> When women are raped by those in a stupor
> When people are killed in wrecks by those in a stupor
> When dopers are in a stupor robbing and killing people
> are there no victims?
> ===============================================
> It is not legal to be drunk and drive?
>
> Of course it is illegal to be drunk and driving but
> after one becomes drunk, they get in a stupor and their
> logic/fears/reflexes are lost. Their fear of being caught
> drunk or doped up .. their common sense is lost...
> so because it was legal for them to get drunk, they
> got in a stupor and because they got in a stupor
> * It cost the rest of us money out of our pockets to pay
> for their stupor.
> * It cost injury and death to thousands of innocent each
> year for their right to be in a stupor.
>
> Victimless crimes?
> * Tell me why non drunks have to pay billions of dollars
> for extra cops to catch and lock up drunks (who are involved
> in legal dope)
> * Tell me why innocent people killed by drunks aren't victims?
> * Tell me why the families of innocent victims are not victims of
> drunks?
>
> ====================================================
> Legal drunks ... Legal dope users .... so then the government
> makes their slaughter, assaults, rapes legal ?
> ///
> Most rapes, etc., are NOT done by drunks...or by dope users...
> \\\
> Duh, did you miss 48 hours last week. What amount of rapes
> did they reveal happened while the pervert was in a stupor?
>
> and the statistics on all the criminals in prison, 80% of them
> were stupid on booze/dope when they committed their crimes.
> =====================================================
> So you ARE arguing for reinstution of Prohibition, aren't you? Just come
> out and admit it.
> ///
> NO, prohibition could never work in a government in which the politicians
> are mob bosses on the take.
> The only way prohibition would ever work is by having the death penalty
> for drunks/dope users and the death penalty for those who get rich
> defending
> them.
> With in a year there would be about 2000 executions and after perverts
> knew they could not get away with it or buy their way out of it, it would
> become
> almost non existent.
> After that time the perverts would stop killing themselves and innocent
> victims.
> With in 10 years there would be over 15 times more lives saved than those
> executed.
> NO, I am not stupid enough to think it will ever happen in a corrupt
> government
> in which the perverts have their rights at the loss of the rights of the
> innocent.
> I know innocent people will never have their rights in America, I only
> point out
> that perverts and their bleeding hearts are an evil force in an evil
> nation.
>
> It does not matter that it will not be changed, establishing the faces of
> the evil
> is my only point.
> ==========================================================
> "Making dope legal will stop crime"
>
> Double Duh
> Booze is legal and on the cop videos and in our newspapers we see
> grocery stores broken into, we read about people being killed by
> drunks who are just getting enough money to get drunk.
> ///
> How do they know that the crimes were done by those who are alcoholics?
> \\\
> Because they admitted to that reason, because they were caught stealing
> booze, because the muggers beating/killing their victims were drunks/dope
> users who were not robbing to by a tv, fix their car or to send money to
> Fawell,
> They beat and rob victims in order to get their next stupor.
> They were stupid on dope or booze while committing their crimes !
>
> How do I know, because that is what the FACTS state.
> =======================================================
> they wouldn't have to do if heroin, etc., were available CHEAPLY to them
> via a government program...
> We'd also cut down on the incidencense of diseases which are spread via
> the sharing of needles...
> ///
> Take a look at the documentary on needle park and see what a crock this
> is.
>
> Who is going to pay for the government doctors, offices and dope...
> me?
> =============================================================
> Heh Heh ... yeah I have the transcript about needle park. It showed
> a place where people were allowed to have all the dope they wanted
> and after about 7 years ago, they went back. 73% of them are now
> dead.
> ///
> Perhaps. But at least the programs got them off the streets, and stopped
> them from committing crimes against the public, and now the park is a
> safe place for families to bring their children.
> \\\
> Yeah, it is save now because they got rid of all the dope users.
>
> Giving someone money so they won't assault or kill us? Sound like
> extortion?
> The last program that got them off the streets is a government dope
> center
> in which innocent tax payers are forced to supply them with dope, doctors
> and medical buildings "so they are safe"
>
> Imagine that, me giving money to a dope user so they won't mug, rob or
> kill me
> or my family.
> Me being forced to pay taxes to keep a stooge in a stupor.
>
> Listen to yourself.
> A mind is a terrible thing to waste, but one must first have one.
>
> ==============================================================
> As for the government supplying dope users with dope ... Yeah
> imagine that, me paying tax money to the government to keep
> dope users stupid on drugs.
> ///
> You're paying big tax money for a 'war on drugs' which isn't working...
> why not institute a program which has been demonstrated to SAVE the tax
> payer money in the long run
> \\\
> Heh Heh, make me prez and the government will become a dope pusher.
> We will pass a law that makes it legal to sell poison dope.
> As the government decides innocent babies do not have the right to live,
> the government can decide dope users don't have the right to live.
> We will make it legal to put poison in any dope and after the idiots
> start
> dropping like flies.. just think "how much tax money we will save in the
> long run".
>
> You (liberals) want to pay to support the drug habits of dope users, fine
> then register with the government and we are willing to let you set up an
> area of the country where your dope users can live and YOU liberals
> can pay to support the dope user's habits.
>
> I am quite willing to allow liberals to have THEIR WAY as long as they
> are
> willing to take THE RESPONSIBILITY of their own wishes.
> =======================================================
>
> We know being drunk and driving is illegal but after someone becomes
> drunk
> or doped up, they get in a stupor and do not give a damn about what is
> legal.
>
> * Would you want your parents to be in a plane with a dope using pilot?
> * Would you let your a dope user be the driver of your kid's school bus?
> * Do you like to be around drunks or dope users or do you think they are
> stupid bastards?
> * Would you want your son or daughter marry a dope user?
> * If your option was to have dope users or non dope users working for
> you, which would you chose?
> * Would you allow your kids to play in a park that dope users hang out
> in?
> * Would you want any of your loved ones in the hospital where the
> doctors
> were druggies?
> * Would you want to have crack users driving on the roads?
> * Would you want your kid's teachers to be dope users?
>
> The test of a dirt bag is finding out if they have different standards
> for others
> than they have for themselves.
> What do you say loud mouth liberals, would you be willing to have your
> own
> families put in these situations if you could stop it?
>
> =======================================================
> No,no,no! You forget his post regarding locking up all us 'supporters'
> of drunks/dopers in some sort of concentration camp with the actual
> substance abusers....
> ///
> No, no, no! my post suggest either
>
> * Quick execution of perverts
> * Liberals and perverts having their own region where the liberals take
> on the cost of taking care of the perverts they defend.
> * Liberals taking on the total financial cost created by perverts.
>
> No I don't want to lock you up and pay to keep you, nor am I stupid
> enough to
> think any of these things will ever happen.
> Imagine submitting to the extortion of perverts to save money.
> Imagine that, the American people supplying perverts with dope so they
> will not beat, rob or kill their families
> =================================================
>
> Dope users, homosexuals, whores, drunks, gamblers ...
> Every segment of society who
> 1) Forces others to pay for their perverted acts.
> 2) sickens
> 3) injures
> 4) terrorizes
> 5) kills innocent people
>
> ARE PERVERTS WHO ARE THE ENEMY OF DECENT PEOPLE
>
> I only point out that the bleeding hearts who protect and fraternize with
> the
> enemy of the innocent segment of society is no knight in shinning armor,
> LIBERALS are cock roaches who ARE THE ENEMY
> of the innocent/decent segment of society !
>
> ====================================================
>
> Let's do this ... find all the dope/booze/whore/homosexual supporting
> liberals.
> All of you agree on some nice part of the country where you would like to
> live and migrate to your mecca of perverts.
> Let them run free or you pay for the cops to control them, you pay for
> the doctors,
> hospitals and dope to keep them happy. (no moralist allowed)
>
> Let the self righteous moralist chose their part of the country where
> they
> can migrate to and have their area to themselves ... with out any fear,
> injury,
> death ... with no perverts allowed.
>
> You and your family live in the middle of the perverts you defend and we
> and our
> families live in the middle of the self righteous moralist. You pay for
> all the cops
> and medical cost of your people and we do the same.
>
> We can never come into your territory and you can never come into ours.
> If our kids decide to join you they can and if your kids decide to join
> us, they
> can.
> What do you say?
>
> Let us do this ... Liberals support the rights of perverts so let all
> liberals register
> as supporters of pervert rights.
> Let some government agency figure the amount of taxes paid for extra
> cops,
> aids research, aids medicines, aids homes, jails, hospitals ...
> Let the government figure all cost caused by pervert rights.
>
> Now all liberals support the rights of perverts so let the liberals pay
> for all taxes
> needed to pay for the acts of the perverts.
> ONLY you want it, so ONLY you pay for it ...
> Agreed?
> Why not divide the country into smoking and non-smoking? Or how about getting
> rid of the drug dealers,(the BIG ONES, not the dime bag guy) then people
> wouldn't be able to buy drugs.Why
blame the little addict when it's the gov. pushing in the first place??My humble
opinion as it is.....hmmm...
> .
>
> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
> screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
> and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
> frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
> spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
> gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
> be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
> nazi's need not apply.
>
> Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> ========================================================================
> Archives Available at:
> http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
>
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> ========================================================================
> To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Om
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
