-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.zolatimes.com/V3.6/pageone.html
<A HREF="http://www.zolatimes.com/V3.6/pageone.html">Laissez Faire City Times
- Volume 3 Issue 6</A>
The Laissez Faire City Times
February 08, 1999 - Volume 3, Issue 6
Editor & Chief: Emile Zola
-----
Canada in a Skinner Box

by Peter Topolewski


In his still-radical 1971 book, Beyond Freedom & Dignity, behaviorist
champion B.F. Skinner wrote about control, specifically how to control
behavior, and who should control it in order to ensure that mankind not
only survives but thrives. He called autonomous man, the inner man and
his will, a fiction created to explain the unexplainable.

He was speaking both psychologically and politically, and so his
theories are anathema to our tradition of man’s innate freedom and
dignity. Skinner declared autonomous man dead, bruising our pride and
leaving us, despite the vehemence of our libertarian mantras, to wonder
if our declaration of freedom has more smoke than substance. Under
Skinner’s light the history of man’s achievements looks frighteningly
unfamiliar, particularly when we admit that no where do humans live as
free individuals, only as controlled ones.

"Control" of itself is not bad. It is a fact of life and, as Skinner
puts it, is "ethically neutral". Questions of right and wrong pertain
only to how it’s used, and to what ends. On political control he wrote:
"A party in power may act primarily to keep its power, or to reinforce
those it governs (who in return keep it in power), or to promote the
state by instituting a program of austerity which may cost the party
both power and support." In Canada these days there is no way to know
whether the ruling party is acting for its own survival or that of the
country.

On the east coast of Canada is an island called Cape Breton. In the 19th
 and early 20th century the coal in its soil was like the seed that grew
the nation. Cape Breton coal fed the construction of the railroad that
tied one coast to another, powered Canada’s industrialization, and
turned the engines that helped win World War One. The men who mined the
coal never grew rich, but they grew tough and dedicated and proud, kin
to the miners in America’s coal states. By World War Two, however, the
world worked on oil, and the way of life in Cape Breton was being
threatened. By the 1960’s there was no money to be made in Cape Breton
coal mining.

Controlling Coal Mining

The Canadian government thought otherwise. Specifically, the federal
government thought that it could make mining in Cape Breton profitable.
In 1967 it created Devco, a government-owned mining company. Last week
the federal government announced that Devco is closing, and this time
for good. The "for good" is an important addition to the government’s
statement because closure has been threatened many times in the
past—"for good" reason. The Devco 30 year track record is a dismal one:
thousands employed, years of restructuring, billions invested, and not
one year of profit to show for it.

This massive socialist experiment was of course not only a poor
investment for Canadian taxpayers, it was an unjust one. What began as a
government’s attempt to bolster Cape Breton’s mines turned into a huge
redistribution of wealth. Devco spent billions dressing up a dead
industry. Three generations of miners worked in what might as well have
been fantasy land, making false contributions, mining for mining’s sake.
Of course, with the government’s benevolence, the mining way of life
continued on Cape Breton; that was really the point all along.

In preserving their way of life, the miners were themselves not above
arrogance. By some unfathomable route – perhaps too immersed in an
industry without foundation – they came to actually see the largesse as
something Canada "owed" them. Government attempts to streamline Devco
were railed against. At times union contract negotiations turned to
violence. This past month, in the face of what the government calls
"assured closure," some miners appeared ready to restructure, but many
were still holding out hope that "it ain’t over". Hope is all that most
have. The government’s kindhearted foray into mining – entered into
despite the history of socialist failure – has created a culture and
countryside of miners. Seventeen hundred miners and their families who
grew up in the mining life—and who know nothing else—last week had that
life dismantled. It is easy for the government to say: It’s time for
Cape Breton’s economy to readjust and retrain. It is an altogether more
painful thing to do.

There is no way to know if the federal government ever believed Devco
could show a profit. In the end the only people truly helped by Devco
were the members of parliament elected to keep the checks coming.
 Preserving a dying industry under false pretenses bought miners time,
but being more reliant on mining than ever has made the inevitable
transition hurt that much more. To the rest of Canada, Devco is another
of the misbegotten projects that has buried the nation in debt. Its
closure is another in a long list of spending cuts the federal
government has made over the last six years. Perhaps this government is
admitting that the oppressive debt and the oppressive taxes are about to
crush the way of life Canadian cherish so dearly.

Canadians in Denial

It is wrong, however, to assume how the government thinks in this
regard, for few Canadians seem to truly care about the debt or the
taxes, and those who seem to care mostly just talk about it. Last year,
for the first time in decades, the federal government created—with a
prodigious amount of balance sheet chicanery —a budget surplus. Now
Canadians of all stripes are calling for more money: doctors, premiers,
artists, scientists, students, the sick, the old, the young, and most
everyone in between. If they had their druthers even the minister of
finance’s own party members would spend the entire budget surplus on
their constituents, as though the money fell from the sky. The
spend-happy Canadians foaming at the mouth for a bite of the budget
surplus are showing the world that they still don’t want to pay for what
they were given all throughout the 70s and 80s. Above all they are
proving that they have utterly no concept the government has borrowed
nearly $600 billion from the banks. The government has placed the nation
at the banks’ mercy. Somehow there is among Canadians severe denial
about this.

For his part, the minister of finance has been promising a cautious
approach for his upcoming budget. Increased spending for the failing
health care system, a small tax cut, and a small debt payment. Is this a
responsible government ruling for the good of the people—a good that
they’re too lame to see? Or is this a government coloring itself
"responsible" to ensure its rule continues?

Well, consider this: in the last month the minister of health announced
the government’s tough new legislation to fight killer tobacco
companies. Now a whole 60 percent of cigarette packaging must be
dedicated to labels such as "smoking can cause a painful death" and
"smoking does not make you more attractive". Furthermore, the local
convenience store cannot any longer display cigarettes at a child’s eye
level. These tough new measures might be significant if they dealt with
something like fattening food or sharp kitchen utensils. But smoking
kills thousands across the country each year. The human and dollar cost
is immeasurable. In light of pharmaceutical regulations that yank
products with the slightest chance of uncomfortable side effects, and
food regulations that destroy products which cause might food poisoning,
or bicycle regulations that require riders to wear helmets, the tough
new tobacco regulations are a complete and sick joke. The reason for the
hypocrisy is of course money. The federal government collects $2 billion
a year in tobacco taxes.

On the other hand, the federal government just granted an income tax
concession to the film industry. The feds had wanted to tax foreign
actors at the same rate as Canadians, a move that would have as good as
killed a sector of the economy that is, despite the local crews’ pride,
surviving on a weak Canadian dollar to attract Hollywood productions.
Deciding that the film industry was a good thing to keep around for the
time being, the government decided that instead of taxing foreign actors
at near 50 percent the rate will be closer to 15 percent.

Perhaps the low tax rate foreign actors enjoy is what the government has
in mind to give all Canadians one day. Such a goal will in the mean time
require many more spending cuts, and many more hidden hypocritical tax
schemes. It might never happen though if today’s ruling party is booted
from power by voters looking for another public spending spree. As B.F.
Skinner pointed out, the controllee also controls the controller.

-30-

from The Laissez Faire City Times, Vol 3, No 6, Feb. 8, 1999
-----
Published by
Laissez Faire City Netcasting Group, Inc.
Copyright 1998 - Trademark Registered with LFC Public Registrar
All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer
The Laissez Faire City Times is a private newspaper. Although it is
published by a corporation domiciled within the sovereign domain of
Laissez Faire City, it is not an "official organ" of the city or its
founding trust. Just as the New York Times is unaffiliated with the city
of New York, the City Times is only one of what may be several news
publications located in, or domiciled at, Laissez Faire City proper. For
information about LFC, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to