-Caveat Lector-
Samatha 'Smith' wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> In a message dated 99-02-07 19:00:57 EST, you write:
>
> > With a kiss, the frog turns into a gorgeous 15-year old girl.
> >
> > "And that, your honor, is how the girl ended up in my room so help me
> > God or my name is not William Jefferson Clinton."
> >
>
> I'd rather have a sexually active man in the WH than a man with
> alzheimer's. And, as long as it is acceptable to viciously bash Presidents on
> this list, anyone have any good DROOL and DIAPER jokes?
> Samantha
*** Repost ***
-----Original Message-----
From: L. Shipton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, January 24, 1999 12:32 AM
Subject: [CTRL] The Future - Could Be Now
http://members.xoom.com/ThePiedPiper/TheFuture.htm
"The Future - Could Be Now"
(c) 23 Jan 99 by Laura Lee Lanning*Shipton
Under Construction and Constant De-Spell-Bugging
Check the link between developmental fats and oils, under
2) The Impact of Outside and Chemical Influences on the Body and Brain
Canola Healthy? - http://www.1999.com/canola/
Oils Vegetable and Animal - Health Risks from Processed Foods
and Trans. Fats: An interview with Mary
Enig, Ph.D. -
http://www.healthy.net/library/articles/passwater/enig01.htm
realize that in The children in the USA (seem to) get most of their fats from
milk.
also check out antibiotics under #7 Health.
(new 23 Jan 99) What does this mean? Look at what oils are at your
market. Check the labels on your favorite foods. Would you believe that
a favorite crinkle cut, frozen potato has Canola oil as a ingredient? Now
knowing that fats are crucial for the body and that even the brain has a large
percentage of fat in it, what would happen, if you were to take out all the
fat that the body is capable of utilizing, or at least utilizing easily? Here in
the USA (it seems that) our primary source of fat for developing children
is milk. Since the milk has BGH which means the cattle have required more
antibiotics - those could well be in the milk too.
What could this mean? Someone saying that we can not attack BGH
because parents might take their children off of milk and - IF you do that
you need to have information about the detrimental ways that oils and fats
are processed. Just look at cottonseed oil, or even soybean oil which is
often processed with solvents. Where could that lead to - the farmer! Yet,
consider what this might lead to IF this continues at the current rate. Will
anyone trust naturally grown food or meat? Would we be talked into
cloning all our meat? Cloning all our food? Take a look at all the things
that are already on my page, I have many more to add, I am hearing
of more daily and many more could be under authorization - even at
this date. Yet, would they keep all these items out of the cloned food
and meat or just find more to add. Recently there was a go ahead to
spray crops with MSG. I do not know if it was implemented but
would this mean that only food sprayed with MSG would be
appealing to children? MSG is a excitotoxin, so would the children
basically go into withdraw if they do not get it?
Also IF we are ever able to go from cloning to replicating. Imagine
who would control the (cloned?) replicator material? The Pharmaceutical
companies? What of off shore banks, one Euro currency, maybe one
American currency? Could this lead to a World Monopoly? Would the
World Bank eventually end up being the only bank? I say Viva La Difference!
Currency seems to be converted easily enough when you buy on line. Could
it be that the technology for replication is already in place? Who would
know what patents are in the patent office, or what inventions are
already being used by the Military - that will soon trickle down to the
public? Who would know? Would people in the government know? Who
would have control, Cattle Futures anyone? Or should I say grain futures?
Could be there might even be a new one - anyone for futures on "Human
Life?"
Many of these things seem to be happening or continuing under the
Clinton administration, yet would I look to Bill Clinton? He has not
been the one that has done the research in that family!
Who would I look at, why at Hillary of course. If the Cliftons know
that this will happen soon or could be in the future - could you imagine
what it would be like with all these chemicals out on the
market? Mainly people sick or dying, a data base of all purchases
that you have received through the replicate, what chemicals were add.
Recently a group of people died from artificial blood, of
course they volunteered for the experiment? No, they did not.
This is the type of bills that are passing or that are allowed to continue.
So, with the ideas that the current administration has shown, what will
happen if replication is a reality? Would they worry about farmers, farm
trucks, truck drivers, trains, supermarkets, and what ever else you can
think of? Would those people need schools? All they would have to do
is to keep some brainy people around - as "brains" - No I did not say that
they would need the bodies, to house those brains. Education? Some body
might get ideas about rebellion. How many do they think they need? Well,
the literacy rate is only one out of every two people right now, and many
children do not like learning or are on some drug to help them, and many
of those drugs curtail brain development, even if those children are given
foods that would allow proper brain development.
I ran across this next item and have not been able to get in touch
with the author. Will someone do so - so that I may make sure
of his approval for it to be here.
-Caveat Lector-
> Subject: I Agree...
>
> This letter was written by Eric Jowers, a retired Army Officer,
> who served as public affairs officer at Fort Rucker from 1989 to 1991.
> He now lives in Ozark, Alabama.
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Dear Mr. President:
> It's not about sex.
> If it were about sex, you would be long gone.
> Just like a doctor, attorney or teacher who had
> sex with a patient, client or student half his age,
> you would have violated the ethics of your office
> and would be long gone.
> Just like a Sergeant Major of the Army, Gene McKinney,
> who though found not guilty, was forced to resign
> amid accusations of sexual abuse.
>
> Remember the Air Force General you wouldn't
> nominate to be Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
> because he freely admitted to an affair almost 15
> years before, while he and his wife were separated?
> Unlike you, he was never accused of having a
> starry-eyed office assistant my daughter's age
> perform oral sex on him while he was on the
> phone and his wife and daughter were upstairs.
>
> If it were about sex, you should be subjected to the
> same horrible hearings that Clarence Thomas was
> subjected to because of the accusations of Anita Hill.
> The only accusation then was that he talked dirty to her;
> he didn't even leave semen stains on her dress.
> No, it's not about sex.
> It's about character.
> It's about lying.
> It's about arrogance.
> It's about abuse of power.
> It's about dodging the draft and lying about it.
> When caught in a lie by letters you wrote,
> you concocted a story that nobody believed.
> But we excused it and looked away.
>
> It's about smoking dope, and lying about it.
> "I didn't inhale," you said.
> Sure, and when I was 15 and my buddies and I
> swiped a beer from an unwatched refrigerator,
> we drank from it, but we didn't swallow.
> "I broke no laws of the United States," you said.
> That's right, you smoked dope in England or Norway or
> Moscow; where you were demonstrating against the U.S.A.
> You lied, but we excused it and looked away.
>
> It's about you selling overnight stays in the White House to
> any foreigner or other contributor with untraceable cash.
> It's about Whitewater and Jim and Susan McDougal and
> Arkansas, Gov. Jim Guy Tucker and Vincent Foster and
> Jennifer Flowers and Paula Jones and Karen Willey and
> nearly countless others.
>
> It's about stealing the records from Foster's office while his
> body was still warm and putting them in your bedroom and
> "not noticing them" for two years.
>
> It's about illegal political contributions.
> It's about you and Al Gore soliciting contributions and selling
> influence at Buddhist temples and in the same Oval Office
> where Abraham Lincoln and Franklin Roosevelt led their
> countries through the dark days of wars that threatened the
> very existence of our nation.
> But we excused you and looked away.
>
> It's about hiding evidence from Ken Starr, refusing to testify,
> filing legal motions, coaching witnesses, obstructing justice
> and delaying Judge Starr's inquiry for months and years,
> and then complaining that it has gone on too long.
> The polls agreed.
> Thank goodness that Judge Starr didn't read the polls,
> play politics or excuse you and look away.
> He held on to the evidence like a tenacious bulldog.
>
> Your supporters say that you've confessed your wrong doings
> and asked for our forgiveness.
> Listen, what you said on TV the night you testified to the grand
> jury was not a confession; overwhelming evidence is not a
> confession at all.
> Not that it would make a lot of difference.
> A murderer who contritely confesses his crime is still a murderer.
> When your "confession" didn't sell, even to your friends, you
> became more forthcoming.
>
> Maybe someday you'll confess more, but probably not.
> You've established such a pattern of lying that we can't
> believe you anymore.
> Neither can your cabinet, the Congress or any of the leaders
> of the nations of the world.
>
> When a leader's actions defame and emasculate our country
> as profoundly as yours have, it's no longer a personal matter,
> as you claim.
> It's no longer a matter among you, your family and your God.
>
> By the way, I don't believe for a minute that Hillary was unaware of
> your sexual misadventures, abuses of power and pattern of lying.
> She has been a party to your wrong doings since Whitewater
> and Jennifer Flowers just as surely as she lied about the Rose
> law firm's billings and hid the Vincent Foster evidence in your
> bedroom for two years.
> Why? So she could share in the raw power that your office carries.
> The two of you probably lied to Chelsea, but that is a matter among
> you, your family and your God.
>
> Remember the sign over James Carvill's desk during the l992 campaign?
> It said, "It's the economy, stupid! Place this sign over your desk:
> "It's about character, stupid!"
> No, it's not about sex, Mr. President.
> If it were, you would be long gone.
> It's about character; but we have to live with your filth,
> lies and arrogance for a while longer.
> Your lies, amorality and lack of character have been as
> pervasive as they have been despicable, so we have no
> reason to believe that you will quietly resign and go away.
> You'll count on half truths and spin doctors to see you through,
> the country be damned.
> It has always worked before.
> We excused you and looked the other way.
>
> No more, we've had enough. You betrayed us enough.
> You have made every elected official, minister, teacher,
> diplomat, parent and grandparent in the country apologize
> for you and explain away your actions.
> Now go away, and let us show them that our country was
> not without morals.
> It was just that you were.
> Let us show them that America was not the problem.
> William Jefferson Clinton was.
>
> Go away, Mr. President. Leave us alone.
> And when you leave, know that your legacy to the United States
> of America will be a stain on the Office of the President that is as
> filthy as the stain on Monica's dress.
> It will take a lot of scrubbing to make it clean again.
> ---------------------------------
>
> If you agree with this letter send it to as many people as possible!!
FEMA is a last resort people. What is he hiding, he is hiding what she is doing -
the
poisoning of our minds against natural food. The fact that spoilage bacteria will
do
in food poisoning (type) bacteria. Other wise you never would have been able to
age beef. Aging allowing to cells to die and partially decompose to tenderize the
meat. And many other things.
(new 23 Jan99) May be reposted in entirety by non profit organizations, as
long as credit is given and the url is left at the end, the part from Eric Jowers
is his.
I do not believe that many things are animal cruelty - but animal athletes. So, I
do
not come under the heading of a animal rights activist.
http://members.xoom.com/ThePiedPiper/Intro2.htm
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
