-Caveat Lector- The Clintons' Marxists? Now that's a laugh. Clinton's policies of a classic right-wing strong man, straight out of South America. If you liked Evita and weep for Pinochet, you'll love the Clintons' version of America. Of course, if by Marxists you mean Chinese or Soviet-style totalitarians, then I might agree with you. But honestly, would a truly progressive left-winger: slash welfare and curtail social spending? demonize the poor? drastically increase defense spending to bring it nearly on par with Reagan's monstrous defense budgets? kiss Wall Street butt with the same delicacy that Monica sucked his own schlong? perpetuate racist jail sentencing? remove barriers that delay state executions? silently acquiesce to the roll back of affirmative action? continue to pony up to Israel even as they trump up various means of quashing the peace process? perpetuate genocide on the children of Iraq with illegal trade sanctions and politically opportunistic bombings? "de-link" human rights concerns from all trade negotiations? continue to persecute the Castro regime? fail to come to Spain's aid in bringing American ally Pinochet to justice? introduce and implement police-state measures that are rapidly eroding our civil rights? screw the working class in this country and around the world with NAFTA, the WTO, and the more reactionary MAI treaty? bend over and accept the paranoid ravings of National Security Statists in the FBI, NSA, CIA, FISA, other organs of civil surveillance? burn alive the members of a relatively unknown and harmless religious group? Really, the only reason most of the Republican right is so hateful towards Clinton is that he has been so successful at stealing and implementing their agenda. When you declare the Clintons to be Marxists or leftists or socialists just damn liberals, you are really falling into their well oiled propaganda trap. They want you to believe that they are put upon humanitarians, when in fact they take their marching orders from the multinationals of global capitalism. Clinton likes to say he "feels your pain" but then enacts legislation that is basically pouring salt on your wounds. Where did protege Gore go first to get endorsements and ideas for his upcoming run for President? Farmers thrown off their land? Workers unemployed because of NAFTA and the multinational run for the border? No, he went to Wall Street. Get a clue, folks. Who's been writing some of the strongest and most informed criticism of the Clinton regime? The Left, actually. Writers like Alexander Cockburn, Christopher Hitchens, Noam Chomsky, Edward Said, Roger Morris, Sam Smith, and Norman Solomon, among others, have been vociferous in their attacks on Clinton's New Reactionaryism. The fact is, Clinton is allied with powers beyond left and right, characters like turn-of-the-century millionaire industrialist Jay Gould, who liked to brag that he could "pay half the working class to kill the other half." And that is exactly the strategy of the Clintons and their Wall Street ilk. They want to reduce us to battling each other while they continue to usurp and consolidate their financial power. And if Clinton was hanging with radicals during the sixties, I would bet it was as an informer for the CIA (rumors of which are discussed in Roger Morris' (another lefty) fine excoriation of Clinton, Partners in Power. He certainly seemed to have some good Agency connections when he became Governor of Arkansas. He'd probably already proved himself useful to the Big Boys, so off they went to Mena to do business with their good old boy. Lucio Benedetto Why Clinton? http://www.netcom.com/~lucio/why_clinton -----Original Message----- From: Gavin Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, February 09, 1999 9:54 AM Subject: [CTRL] Re-post Bill and Hill=Marxists > -Caveat Lector- > >In a message dated 98-10-06 12:09:51 EDT, you write: > ><< Source. www.devvy.com/death_list.html#SOFC > > > Millions of words have been written about these two > people. Bill Clinton didn't acquire the nickname "Slick" > from all his years in politics down in Arkansas without > good reason. Bill and Hill's political regime has always > been referred to as the "Dixie Mafia" for the incredibly > bold fashion in which these two routinely break the law. > No? Oh, please, open your eyes and look at the facts. > Below in the reference section are materials that you can > acquire which document their crimes from day one. Not > gossip, not spin, not conspiracy, but facts. Doesn't it > bother the American people when they hear this "the > White House is putting the best spin on it" stuff? Doesn't > the American public see what "spin" translates into? It > means taking lies, massaging them into something > resembling a smidgen of truth and then force feeding it > down people's throats. How insulting. > > When I say that Bill and Hill are Marxists, that's exactly > what I mean. Bill Clinton is the President of the United > States of America. He is privy to the highest and most > classified secrets of our nation dealing with national > security. Do you know he cannot and does not have any > kind of security clearance? That's right. Why? Because > of his past dealings with the Ruskies, the KGB and his > cocaine use. Heavens! This should bother the heck out > of every thinking American out there. Apparently it > doesn't because we continue to hear the chant of the > brain-dead: "I don't care who he has sex with in his > private life," "It's not our business who he sleeps with, if > it doesn't bother Hillary, it doesn't bother me." > > What sniveling bubble heads these sheep are in their myopic > world of blind loyalty to any politician who will grease > their palms with the most government perks from my > checkbook. Let's look at Mr. Clinton's own words to > judge what his political ideology really is: > The following is an excerpt from Des Griffin, a gifted > writer and prolific researcher of facts [March, 1998]: > > "In the final analysis, the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal is a > sideshow - a relatively minor distraction. Its salacious > nature serves to draw away from more important issues, > namely those that effect the future of the U.S. For well > over three decades, the life of William Jefferson (Blythe) > Clinton has followed an unrelenting pattern of personal > deception, immorality, political corruption and national > betrayal....Leaving the U.S. to avoid serving his country > in Vietnam, went to England on a Rhodes Scholarship. > As a student at Oxford, Clinton organized and led > anti-American demonstrations and engaged in other > leftist activities. In 1970, Bill Clinton was rewarded for > his anti-American activities: he was the guest of the KGB > on an all-expenses paid trip from Paris to Moscow. > The October 25, 1992 issue of Rudge Pravda, the > official paper of the Czechoslovakian Communist Party, > carried an article titled, "Mr. Clinton Stayed with Agent > of STB, Select Company." It revealed that on his return > journey from Moscow, Clinton stopped off for ten days > in Prague. There he stayed in the home of Marie > Svermore and her husband Bedrich Kubold." For the > sake of brevity, this family is well plugged into the > Communist Party and their son, Jan, attended Oxford > with Clinton. > "Another interesting trip made by Bill Clinton was > exposed by the Italian paper, Il Sabato, August 1992 in > an article titled 'Comrade Bill,' where reporter Antonio > Socci told of an interview he had with Clinton at the > Democratic convention in NY a few weeks earlier. > Clinton revealed that he had gone to Italy five years > earlier to study how to solve economic problems. "I > came five years ago to find out how the cooperatives, > the artisan cooperatives, and the micro enterprises > function. Then I went back to Arkansas and helped to > put together 70 youth cooperatives." > Socci was fascinated. "Don't tell me this communist > cooperative is your economic prescription for America?" > "Absolutely," Clinton replied. Upon his return to Italy, > Socci interviewed members of the Italian Communist > Party and they confirmed that Clinton had in fact visited > their cooperatives in 1987. One remembered the visit > well, saying that he told Clinton the cooperatives were > run by communists and socialists. Clinton's response > was, "No problem." > > No? This can't be real? This must be more anti-Clinton, > vast right-wing conspiracy smear material! Wake Up. > There is a book you must read, it's short but to the point > and one of the most documented and factual > presentations I have ever seen. In this work titled > SECRET, you will see the FBI documents that link Bill > and Hillary Clinton to a Marxist Terrorist network [the > FBI's description, not mine]. They gave money to the > IPS [Institute for Policy Studies] and have been very > active in promoting their agenda: Marxism. No? Do your > homework. SECRET is listed in the reference section. > You'll be amazed at how many of their current chums > and White House staff came from this Marxist > organization. > This next section is one which cannot be overlooked and > must be exposed. Let me use the words of former > Congressman William E. Dannemeyer who wrote to > "leaders" of both the Senate and House of the U.S. > Congress. In his letter, he starkly pointed their befuddled > minds to the number of people who have died under > other than natural causes who hold a connection with Bill > Clinton and stated that "the number has reached a total > that can only be described as frightening." Below is that > list of dead human beings. This is not a conspiracy. > These people are dead and their relationship to Clinton is > well documented. Wake Up America. >> > >DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER >========== >CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic >screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters >and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright >frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects >spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL >gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; >be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and >nazi's need not apply. > >Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. >======================================================================== >Archives Available at: >http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html > >http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ >======================================================================== >To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: >SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: >SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Om > DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
