-Caveat Lector- <A HREF="http://www.spunk.org/library/groups/sfa/sp000503.txt"> http://www.spunk.org/.../groups/sfa/sp000503.txt</A> ----- FLUSHING OUT THE SCOTTISH FINANCIAL MAFIA: The shady Case of the Glasgow Development Agency by Billy Clark The aim here is to examine in some detail an organisation called Scottish Enterprise (SE) which was invented in 1988 by Bill Hughes, at the time a CBI boss and advisor to the Thatcher government, now the director of Grampian Holdings. SE is the parent body of 14 local Enterprise Companies (LECs) and by looking in detail at one of these, the Glasgow Development Agency (GDA), we shall see that it represents a gathering of powerful business/financial alliances. The information provided here aims to inform our understanding of the forces in operation here, how they function and in whose interest. When Hughes proposed the SE system, he bypassed the then Secretary of State for Scotland, Malcolm Rifkind, going straight to Mrs. Thatcher. This unusual tactic was adopted because after the disastrous fall in the Scottish Tory vote in the '87 elections, the Scottish Office was blamed for resisting the new economic culture through the Scottish Development Agency (SDA). Unable to conceive that her policies alienated the Scottish electorate, Thatcher was already mulling over plans to scapegoat and abolish the SDA when Hughes opportunistically knocked on her door. We cannot fully reconstruct their conversation, but perhaps Hughes promised to set things to rights by transforming the SDA (created in '75 by Willie Ross) from a child of Wilsonian Corporatism, into a vehicle for promoting Thatcherism . Perhaps too, he would have said something about the deal being squeezed past the Treasury via the promise of selling off, what could be sold of the SDA's property portfolio (they managed to raise 100m pounds before the slump set in), and privitising anything else the SDA had a share in. In any case something made Thatcher's eyes light up and two years later the project was launched at the Dunblane Hydro. It has hardly met with a word of praise since. OBVIOUS CONNECTIONS Its initial hierarchy was established as follows: at the head of SE Sir David Nickson of the Clydesdale Bank, General Accident, Hambros Bank and Scottish & Newcastle Breweries. This choice alone represented a sizable percentage of Scottish Capital and was further enlarged with the two leaders of the main LECs in Glasgow and Edinburgh: Lord McFarlane and Sir Charles Annand Fraser respectively. Having the more obvious connections to Nickson, McFarlane is the director of some fifty or so companies, the main ones being The Clydesdale Bank, General Accident, The American Trust, Clansman, Edinburgh Fund Managers and United Distillers/Guiness plc. His other companies concentrate on the construction and fitting out of offices from their painting right down to the packaging the furniture comes in, its transportation, and adhesive labels, the lot basically : if you work in an office, go the bank then go for a drink, McFarlane's interests are well served. Politically we can locate him on the Authoritarian Right, he funds British United Industries (a somewhat secretive channel for funding right-wing political projects), and of course the Conservative Party, General Accident alone donates around 50,000 pounds a year. In the light of this it is clear that McFarlane would readily be attracted by a steering role in an organisation devoted to manipulating the political climate of Glasgow towards the right, and that he would have identified this agenda as one which would in due course enhance his own empire. McFarlane also seemed to have been highly aware of the opportunity the creation of the Glasgow LEC offered in openly manipulating the Labour controlled District Council: and it looks like he achieved everything he set out to do in this respect, but we will return to this subject later. Sir Charles Annand Fraser's interests are similar to McFarlane's, and they have been similarly financially enhanced through the hype of local enterprise. He is the director of about sixty companies including Scottish Television, Scottish Widows, Stakis plc and United Biscuits. Fraser's main activities are inextricably linked to Edinburgh tourism, with Stakis and United Biscuits, and are augmented with other interests concerning property development and "Heritage" projects; further interests being offshore tax-exempted trusts ( British Assets Trust, Fidelity, Investors Capital Trust etc) dealing mostly in cash deposits in various currencies . These are all very large companies if not monopolising their fields, certainly dominating them, Scottish Widows alone makes profits of 1,000m and is the second biggest Company in Scotland. So here we have two rich, highly important and influential men, who would feel insulted if we did not describe them as motivated solely by personal gain and the pursuit of wealth, at the head of the Glasgow Development Agency (GDA) and Lothian and Edinburgh Enterprise Ltd. (LEEL). The question is why? The other question - as ever - is where is all the money going? A COMMUNAL SLUSH FUND But there are more than just two men running the Scottish Financial Mafia, the LECs as an adjunct to the process of profiteering seems to be acting as a communal slush fund for a fair cross section of Scottish capitalism. If we were to examine the other directors of even one each of McFarlane and Fraser's main companies we would see that they are connected to almost the entire spectrum of the nonparliamentary right who control finance, investment and industry in Scotland. To identify just the Banking interests alone: McFarlane and SE boss Sir David Nickson as we have already seen represent The Clydesdale Bank and General Accident. General Accident's other directors include the directors of the Royal Bank of Scotland, the TSB and the Ottoman Bank so we have four banks there, (five if we count Nickson's directorship of Hambros which is a Merchant bank). One of Sir Charles Annand Fraser's Company, Scottish Widows, contains directors of the Clydesdale Bank, The Royal Bank of Scotland, The Bank of Scotland and Merchant Bank Kleinwort Benson, together with directors of the main Scottish Investment Trusts, Murray Johnstone, Jardine Fleming and Baille Gifford. Undoubtedly it was these connections - and you will appreciate we have just skimmed the surface - which would further recommend them for the job of heading a LEC. Such alliances are not unusual: we would find similar groups of supposedly competing banks always in existence, to a greater or lesser extent, if we examined any of the top Clearing Banks, Merchant Banks, Insurance Companies or Investment Trusts. It should also be pointed out that the official function of an LEC is defined as that of encouraging enterprise by providing business with financial or other forms of "strategic leadership and tactical support" including the encouragement of investment and training. It has never been openly advanced in their own publicity material that they have, a now somewhat anachronistic, "Thatcherite" mission, nor what that might entail. Their involvement in local politics is usually defined, if at all, in terms of unsubstantiated boasts or buzzwords such as "job creation" and "inward investment". Each of the LECs have a budget of upwards of 55m pounds, while the total SE expenditure was put at 449m pounds for the last financial year. While the overall initial popular perception of this was that the money is given to deserving cases, SE have made it clear that they do not think their role is to "bail out bankrupt companies". (Herald 1/5/93). They are however hell-bent on spending money on themselves. THEY LIKE TO SAY YES ! Now let us focus on the Glasgow LEC, the Glasgow Development Agency (GDA). McFarlane recently departed his post handing it over to Forbes McPherson (the director of the TSB, Glasgow Cultural Enterprises, Hill Samuel Bank (a Merchant bank subsidiary of the TSB), The Scottish Metropolitan Property Co. and Scottish Mutual Assurance). Under his leadership the GDA has funded several "new operations", the main ones, indeed the onlyones, include aiding Abbey National Life in occupying the building that BP vacated when they removed their operation elsewhere (to be awarded 260,357 by Forth Valley Enterprise, whose directors include Edward Ferguson of BP Chemicals). The GDA has also funded "second round investments", passing funds to Direct Line Insurance (a subsidiary of the Royal Bank of Scotland ), Provincial Insurance, British Airways, Barclays Stockbrokers, The Norwich Union and the Army Personnel Centre, most of which as we shall see are old friends to Bill Hughes. The GDA's 92/93 Accounts and Report gives us an interesting insight into how they arrived at these decisions : "Other location marketing activities include ... participation in complementary events such as the Scottish Financial Enterprise dinner in London ." Some readers may have already come to the conclusion that for a business to relocate in Glasgow it will most likely have closed its operation somewhere else, obviously resulting in staff dismissals, and such is the case with the examples cited above: the Army Pay Centre for example relocating from Ashton-under-Lyne with all the workers being sacked. If we examine the pattern of funding we would see that the financial institutions received funds on the pretext of training. This too is somewhat misleading given that virtually all of the large financial institutions have been heavily fined by their regulatory bodies for failing to properly train their staff and engaging in professional misconduct (thus precipitating the massive private pensions swindle); including ofcourse Abbey National Life and the Norwich Union (who suspended their entire pensions sales staff as part of their re-training). So here we have an insight into the process of how the GDA works, which could be roughly summarised as follows: (1) You go to a free lunch in London with a group of people who are stockbrokers, bankers and insurance men. (2) They tell you what to do. (3) You give them lots of money. (4) They sack a lot of their workforce. A NICE LINE IN........ The decision to award 250,000 to Direct Line Insurance (again taken from the GDA training budget) did not pass without comment by the Labour Party who called for an enquiry into the matter. By the reactionary nature of the enquiry they demanded, it could be easily argued that they either completely fail to understand the reality of the function of the GDA or are unwilling to concede their own role in it. Their posture of outrage seems solely fuelled by the fact that Direct Line gained a high public profile as one of the fastest growing companies in the UK, with one of the highest paid directors, Peter Wood, who receives a yearly salary of 6m. The Labour Party are happy with SE as a whole, and they have to be, because their argument that Directline should fund themselves rather than dip into pork barrel, while being morally inspiring in an abstract way, directly intertwines with the process of Labour Party patronage, as we shall see below. One could also say the same concerning the fuss made over the fact that a great deal of the LECs, all of them it would seem, have been awarding funds to companies owned by members of the LECs. Direct Line is not run by anyone on the GDA, it is though run by someone on Dumfries and Galloway Enterprise: its chairman, Sir Michael Herries (also of Scottish Widows and one of Sir Charles Fraser's Investment Companies). Although the GDA claim (Glasgow Herald 11/11/93) that "no directors or connected persons had a material interest in any contract [issued by the GDA]" they add the paradoxical rejoinder that "this does not mean, however, that there were no financial contracts involving companies with directoral links". Sadly they declined to provide any further information, but what they are most likely concealing is the fact that Scottish Mutual Assurance, Forbes McPherson's company, is a subsidiary of the Abbey National, who as referred to above are supposedly slipping quietly into the old BP offices aided by GDA funds and good wishes. Coincidentally BP Chemicals had to hand over most of the 260,357 when it was fined a total of 230,000 for burning one worker to death and seriously burning three others in February '92. So there we have another use for enterprise cash: if you kill your workers your local LEC will cover your legal fees. Research has only begun into the merry-go-round of funding concerning LEC's director's companies receiving LEC funds (Herald 11/11/93); a bigger and more revealing picture of this process would show the inter-relationships between LECs funding other LEC directors companies. RETURN OF THE JOKER But none of this would come as any surprise to our founding father Bill Hughes. Who has gone on record as viewing the situation thus : "You're always going to get the joker, always that one case every year or two where the Fraud Squad is called in. That's unavoidable in any walk of life today ... If we are going to have top-quality people serving on LEC boards I would be surprised if they weren't trying to help their own businesses. Gosh they're giving up their time for nothing and that's good news". That kind of talk cuts both ways ofcourse: as was mentioned above Hughes runs a company called Grampian Holdings which is engaged in such diverse activities as transport bulk tippers, plant hire equipment, sporting goods and pharmaceuticals, its institutional shareholders are Murray Johnstone: 4.08%, Scottish Widows: 4.89%, Barclays Bank: 4.3%, Standard Life: 3.48%, Scottish Amicable: 3.52%, National Westminster Bank: 3.09%, Abbey Life: (a subsidiary of Abbey National) 3.27% and Scottish Mutual Insurance: 3.55%, the bulk of whom we have already encountered above as the recipients of GDA funding. Another director of Grampian Holdings is Professor Donald Mackay who last year took over from Sir David Nickson as the overall head of Scottish Enterprise. Professor Mackay (an advisor to six Secretaries of State for Scotland, and whose other Company Pieda has been receiving SE money from the start) has his work cut out for him, with an investigation by the EC Commission's Co-ordination of Fraud Prevention Unit (Glasgow Herald 10/7/93), the result of an adverse audit of SE accounts in relation to their disposal of European Social Fund Money (money designed to help the poor),resulting in the present Commons Select Committee on Scottish Affairs enquiry into the operation of all the Enterprise agencies. It will be interesting to see if the Commons enquiry touches upon the GDA's secret allocation of 500,000 to another of the UK's fastest growing companies, Peel Holdings. This is something of a farcical tale of Peel Holdings claiming that it had negotiated a contractual claim on a plot of land in Cambuslang Glasgow (which incidentally is highly polluted) during the old days of the SDA. They made their claim known when the GDA paradoxically offered the same land to a very peculiar company called Superstadia (run by a man facing racketeering charges in the USA). The money was given to Peel so they would give up their "rights" to the land; but because of the secrecy of the transaction the nature of these were never fully established. Peel itself is based in Manchester and run by a millionaire property speculator, some local Councillors and individuals from the local Manchester Development/Enterprise companies. On a similar theme, and unfortunately for our righteously indignant Labour Party, the enquiry could also touch on one of their more sensitive points, namely an old SDA loan to a property company run by some Monklands District Councillors which was unaccountably written off. The Labour Party calls for investigation into quangos has already reached points of transcendental absurdity with ousted Glasgow City Council Leader Jean McFadden going into print railing on about their lack of accountability, without disclosing that she herself is on the board of the GDA, as was her predecessor Pat Lally, and as is STUC "supremo" Campbell Christie . Turning back to Forbes McPherson, the reader will recall that he is a member of a company called Glasgow Cultural Enterprises (GCE). This was set up in 1990 during the "Year of Culture " to profit from and administrate (including the spending of a 1m Council subsidy) the recently built Royal Concert Hall, (a similar deal being struck with the other main Glasgow concert venue, the SECC). Similar to the GDA, GCE is made up of a alliance of Labour Councillors and top Businessmen and aptly demonstrates the willingness (some would say complicity) of the Labour Council to embrace the privatisation of its amenities indicative of the transfer of power integral to the GDA's right-wing agenda. The celebrations of a new Glasgow in 1990 directly coincided with the launch of the GDA, which from its onset completely took over the Council's budget and responsibilities regarding the "redevelopment" of the City, largely on the pretext that they would encourage "culture and tourism". In regard to their Thatcherite crusade (inasmuch as that word merely mystifies the unaccountable power of finance capital and the City of London) the notion of cultural redevelopment provides the GDA with an all encompassing scope for tinkering with local democracy. FINGERS IN THE PIE Another significant member of GCE is (the recently knighted) Sir Ray Johnstone whose directorships include Scottish Amicable, Murray Johnstone Investment Trust, and Scottish Financial Enterprise (SFE). The reader will also recall that it is SFE which advises the GDA at those London dinners. A partial breakdown of some of the other directors of Scottish Amicable including their other directorships would include: Dr. William Brown: GMTV, Pauline Hyde & Associates, Radio Clyde. The Scottish Arts Council, STV. [Brown is an ex-director of the GDA]. Roy Nicolson: Cathedral Investments, Eurosalas Properties, Forth Valley Enterprise, J. Rothschilds Assurance. Maurice Paterson: Lautro Ltd. [The regulatory body for Insurance Companies]. Thomas Johnston: Bank of Scotland, Science Projects (Scotland). Ronald Miller: Dawson International, Christian Salvesen, Securities Trust of Scotland. Peter Jamieson: Robert Fleming Holdings, Jardine Fleming Group (Bermuda), Kleinwort Overseas Investment Trust. Bernard Solomans: Allied Provincial, Edinburgh Fund Managers Investment Trust, The London Stock Exchange, Scottish Financial Enterprise. Through Ray Johnstone we can see an intimate picture of the relationship between SFE, GCE, and the LECs not to mention Cultural funding bodies, the media and a range of Investment Trusts and Financial Institutions. One other, now ex-director of SFE is Angus Grossart whose companies Noble Grossart (Scotland's first merchant Bank), Alexander & Alexander, American Trust, Scottish Investment Trust, Scottish Television, The Royal Bank of Scotland, Edinburgh Fund Managers, Hewden Stuart and Murray International Holdings; make Grossart one of the most influential men in Scotland : Alexander & Alexander is the world's second biggest insurance broker, and has recently(more or less) taken over the running of the Glasgow Royal Infirmary Trust, imposing ludicrous conditions on the ancillary staff who have started a strike in protest.And here we have the crux of the matter: if you have a conflict of interest, because it is they who make their money through people making private provision for theses things, through private pensions, health care insurance and so forth, add to that the unaccountability of a quango and we can see the LECs as a key instrument in basic covert right-wing operations. We can connect Angus up with Norman McFarlane through The American Trust which they both run (interestingly along with Aims of Industry member Lord Goold); they also jointly run Edinburgh Fund Managers, its parent company. These two companies run the mineworkers Pension scheme and the British Coal staff pension scheme, investing it in American securities. Edinburgh Fund Managers also manage the investment portfolio of The Smaller Companies International Trust, which they foolishly invested in a company called International Signal & Control (IS&C), which some readers may know became part of the BCCI/Iran-Contra saga: it was an arms Company which merged with Ferranti and then collapsed, leaving a 1bn hole in Ferranti's accounts (causing its collapse) and sending IS&C's far-right chairman into an American jail (the other directors who were Washington power brokers seem to have escaped). It would be interesting to see when Edinburgh Fund Managers ditched their IS&C shares, this would reveal the extent of Grossart and McFarlane's far-right connections. The investment world is a tricky business and to get in on the bottom floor one must engage in what can only be termed espionage. The world of banking and high finance has long interpenetrated with that of the Secret Service and the sharing of intelligence forms the basis of how UK interests are protected and advanced. FAR RIGHT CONNECTION The far-right connections seem to abound here, going back to Forbes McPherson, our GDA leader shares his seats on the board of the TSB and Hill Samuel with Sir Richard Lloyd of the Ditchley Foundation and various arms companies. The Ditchley Foundation is based at Ditchley Park and " is a conference centre...used for private VIP meetings guarded by Special Branch and MI5. It was used by the ISC [Institute for the study of Conflict] as a conference centre from 1972 onwards; the ISC Council minutes of 21/1/72 mention an ISC conference on Ireland that was held under conditions of extreme secrecy. Ditchley park is closely linked to the Bilderberg Group, 14 of whose members sit on the centre's board of Governors." (Lobster no.26 page 16). Lloyd has been on the Council of management of the Ditchley Foundation since 1974, and he also sat in on the mid-seventies Wilson Committee's attempts to curb the unaccountable power of the financial world, so Forbes keeps some interesting company. The question of whether the LECs are underwriting the expenses of the larger businesses and financial institutions is hardly open to debate . It is hard to see what the waste of time and money represented by the Commons tinkering enquiry into it will achieve, a fine perhaps, some government funds returning to the Treasury, one or two resignations ? Already there has been a few resignations from within the LECs on the basis that some directors were not told what was actually going on. SCREENING FOR WORKFARE It has also been reported, even in the mainstream media, that the banks have taken over the role hitherto the province of the Economic League: that of amassing personal information on individuals to establish a political and social profile with a view to political vetting and blacklisting. Secretive elements in what must be the most sinister aspect of the work of the LECs can be tentatively identified in aspects of their training projects, particularly with the work of the Restart Programme (the LECs receive a large part of their funding from the Department of Employment). It is true that the management of the unemployed is moving into the hands of shady little companies which are funded by the LECs while assuming the guise of private companies. One of the more peculiar activities of the week-long compulsory Restart course is the collection of data on its subjects: they are asked to write a CV as an exercise and these are collected (typed out by persons unknown) and never returned to the individual, there are also several personality assessment questionnaires which are again assiduously collected. All "long-term" unemployed individuals have to endure these courses or suffer the withdrawal of their benefit. Amounting to little more than pencil sharpening and clock watching, the courses offer a golden opportunity to gather all manner of intelligence on "troublemakers". They are also staffed at a higher level by people fresh from training in the US on the Workfare system,the model for future Government policy. The Natwest Bank has also become the owner of the Contaminated Land Register, which lists thousands of polluted sites throughout the UK. Prior to the last election the Government did promise that this would be published and made public, but they reneged on this and now a company or individual has to pay the Natwest (after a suitable vetting no doubt) to find out what lies beneath the surface of a prospective development or an existing one. The LECs are also supposedly responsible for clearing up polluted sites of, for example ex-steel mills such as Ravenscraig. This is (at times literally) something of a minefield in social, economic and political terms, particularly since the property and construction industries (the two biggest clients of the Banks and Insurance companies) are in such a slump. There are massive interests being protected here: in the US a new report estimates that the insurance Companies will have to reserve $260bn in additional funds to meet their exposure to environmental and asbestos claims over the next 15 years (Financial Times 13/4/94). And it is much the same in the UK, only made worse by the partially cataclysmic problems already facing Lloyds (which acts as the clearing house through which every Insurance company works). So a document like the Contaminated Land Register, and the responsibility for clearing up the mess, of at times immortal toxins, strewn all over post-industrial Britain, has to be put into safe hands or better still in nobodies, hands in the Natwest's bomb proof bunker. STARSHIP ENTERPRISE The concept of Enterprise and Enterprise Zones are, on a wider scale, at the core of how the World Bank and the IMF function as the premier development agencies. Both draw on top executives from the main European and American Banks, and of course function as a wing of Western, mainly US, foreign policy; largely free from legislative, judicial constraints and popular influence, they are increasingly the principal agents in forcing governments to "devalue their currency, privitise their industries, open their doors to foreign investment, freeze wages, raise food prices, slash social services and implement Bank-sanction population programmes." (Covert Action No 39, p28). With a Government as intertwined with the financial Institutions as we have in the UK, what is done in the name of development by the World Bank and the IMF is not restricted to the "Third World" but is continually modified into local variants for home application. Professor Donald MacKay, the new SE leader made his name as a consultant by winning a $1m Economic consultancy from the World Bank . Firmly in the neo-conservative monetarist camp, he believes that "the only way public spending can be cut in any meaningful way would be a through a major shake up of the social security system including a rethink about the principle of universal benefits". (Scotsman 12/1/93) It was Bill Hughes' experimental contribution to this, in the form of the creation of SE, which would have really made Mrs. Thatcher's eyes light up. Back in '88 when she gave him the go-ahead Hughes must have felt like Yul Brenner in the Magnificent Seven, gathering up institutional investors in his own Company and his CBI chums and riding into town, the difference being that the Bandits terrorising the locals are indistinguishable from their new found protectors. ----- Aloha, He'Ping, Om, Shalom, Salaam. Em Hotep, Peace Be, Omnia Bona Bonis, All My Relations. Adieu, Adios, Aloha. Amen. Roads End Kris DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
