-Caveat Lector-

>From NYTimes, Op-Ed

      February 24, 1999


Forfeiting Property and More

      By IRA GLASSER

     I n "Through the Looking Glass," the White Queen announces a new
     legal doctrine: "Punish first and then get on with the trial."
     Mayor Rudolph Giuliani seems ready to emulate this logic.

     First he announced that New York City would seize the cars of
     people accused of drunk driving and return the cars if the people
     were acquitted. Then he decided he'd keep the cars of those
     acquitted as well.

     "Let's say somebody is acquitted," the Mayor explained, "and it's
     one of those acquittals in which the person was guilty, but there
     is just not quite enough evidence." So now the Mayor gets to decide
     who is "really" guilty, never mind the evidence or a jury's
     unanimous decision. Do you feel safe?

     But perhaps Mr.

     Giuliani has done us all a favor by raising the subject of civil
     asset forfeiture. Under a 1984 Federal law, Federal officials can
     seize property suspected of being used in a crime, without
     arresting anyone. Many states have similar laws.

     By arresting property instead of people, the Government does an
     end-run around the Constitution.

     Since property has no rights, the argument goes, no notice is
     required, no prior hearing is required, and evidence beyond a
     reasonable doubt isn't required -- a neat trick.

     But consider the consequences. A couple in Connecticut lost their
     home because Federal agents found drugs in their grandson's room. A
     landscaper who bought supplies from nurseries that demanded cash
     payments was seized when he paid for an airline ticket with a
     portion of the $9,600 he was carrying. Federal agents assumed he
     was a drug dealer, and though he had no police record and no
     involvement with drugs, they confiscated all his money.

     In another case, a man with glaucoma who owned a 90-acre farm in
     Kentucky grew a few marijuana plants on the advice of his
     ophthalmologist, who was authorized by the Federal Government to
     test marijuana for the medical treatment of the disease. The
     ophthalmologist testified that it was the only medication that
     could help. The Government confiscated his farm anyway.

     In other cases, state and Federal authorities have taken cars,
     homes, restaurants and cash. Usually they sell the assets and keep
     the proceeds. There is now close to $3 billion in the Federal
     "Asset Forfeiture Fund," and local police departments have padded
     their budgets as well.

     Many people who have had their property seized are not even
     arrested or charged with a crime. The statutes authorizing these
     seizures do not require a prior hearing. Worse, the Supreme Court
     has upheld seizures of this kind, so reform almost certainly will
     require legislation.

     Modest reforms are pending in Congress with a bill sponsored by
     Representative Henry Hyde, who has called civil asset forfeiture
     "Kafkaesque." But these reforms are not enough.

     Civil asset forfeiture is unfair and un-American. It deserves to be
     resisted by all citizens, any one of whom may one day be its
     victim.

     Ira Glasser is executive director of the American Civil Liberties
     Union.



     _________________________________________________________________

   Home | Site Index | Site Search | Forums | Archives | Marketplace

   Quick News | Page One Plus | International | National/N.Y. | Business
   | Technology | Science | Sports | Weather | Editorial | Op-Ed | Arts |
   Automobiles | Books | Diversions | Job Market | Real Estate | Travel

   Help/Feedback | Classifieds | Services | New York Today

   Copyright 1999 The New York Times Company

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to