-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.zolatimes.com/V2.41/pageone.html
<A HREF="http://www.zolatimes.com/V2.41/pageone.html">Laissez Faire City Times
- Volume 2 Issue 41</A>
The Laissez Faire City Times
December 7, 1998 - Volume 2, Issue 41
Editor & Chief: Emile Zola
-----
Al Gore Proclaims World Soap Day

by Wolf De Voon


Five years ago I examined and refuted Garrett Hardin's "The Tragedy of
the Commons" [Science 162 (1968) :1243-1248] in a private communication
that was subsequently lost, and I no longer have the wit to reproduce it
with similar energy or eloquence. Yesterday I suffered a complete mental
breakdown while listening to Al Gore. Contact with other human beings is
extremely difficult for me now. The most I seem able to do is listen to
vapid radio broadcasts or read in silence.

Today I picked up The Limits to Growth, published in 1972 by the Club of
Rome, a group of scientists organized by MIT to study "the world
problematique."

If you are unfamiliar with this French expression, it refers to
apparently real constraints on exponential increase of world population,
industrial output, energy consumption, and pollution. The Club of Rome
used their best efforts to devise a model of the global economic system
in 1970 and predicted:


"The behavior of the system is clearly that of overshoot and collapse.
The industrial capital stock grows to a level that requires an enormous
input of resources. In the very process of that growth it depletes a
large fraction of the resource reserves available. As resource prices
rise and mines are depleted, more and more capital must be used for
obtaining resources, leaving less to be invested for future growth.
Finally investment cannot keep up with depreciation, and the industrial
base collapses, which have become dependent on industrial inputs such as
fertilizers, pesticides, hospital laboratories, computers, and
especially energy for mechanization. For a short time the situation is
especially serious because population, with the delays inherent in the
age structure and the process of social adjustment, keeps rising.
Population finally decreases when the death rate is driven upward by
lack of food and health services."

Fearing an avalanche of skepticism, the Club of Rome reconfigured their
global economic model with ideal assumptions: unlimited natural
resources, stringent pollution controls (cut emissions to one-quarter of
1970 levels), increased agricultural productivity, and "perfect" birth
control. Global starvation is delayed from 2010 to 2050, but the
long-run forecast remains unchanged:


"The basic behavior mode of the world system is exponential growth of
population and capital, followed by collapse... [T]his behavior mode
occurs if we assume no change in the present system or if we assume any
number of technological changes in the system... [W]e have not been able
to find a set of policies that avoids the collapse mode of behavior."

Hmm. Pretty bleak forecast. Population will increase, along with
consumption and pollution, until the planet can no longer sustain
economic growth. Whatever shall we do? The Club of Rome offered a
solution:


"If there is cause for deep concern, there is also cause for hope.
Deliberately limiting growth would be difficult, but not impossible. The
way to proceed is clear, and the necessary steps, although they are new
ones for human society, are well within human capabilities. Man
possesses, for a small moment in his history, the most powerful
combination of knowledge, tools, and resources the world has ever known.
He has all that is physically necessary to create a totally new form of
human society... [E]quilibrium would require trading certain human
freedoms, such as producing unlimited numbers of children or cunsuming
uncontrolled amounts of resources, for other freedoms, such as relief
from pollution and crowding and the threat of collapse of the world
system. It is possible that new freedoms might also arise -- universal
and unlimited education, leisure for creativity and inventiveness, and,
most importantly of all, the freedom from hunger and poverty..."

It is not my purpose to debunk this theory or to quibble about growth
variables used by the Club of Rome almost 30 years ago.

It is not important to me that Al Gore adopted an insane economic model:
less growth, tougher pollution controls, more spending for education and
leisure (rather than "wasteful" industrial output).

America got the Club of Rome message, loud and clear. Steel production
is bad, bread and circuses are good.

I don't care. Let's pretend that the Club of Rome and presumptive
President Gore are right. The world is headed for global chaos in 2050,
unless every American citizen takes up environmentally-friendly
badminton as a career choice.

I want you to agree with this scenario: that there is an ultimate,
fundamental, inherent and permanent conflict between the general welfare
(i.e., the greatest good of the greatest number) and your personal
happiness.

Call it "Hardin Revisited" -- that public lands are always spoiled by
selfish individuals, who have no rational economic motive to limit their
use of natural resources.

Or call it "Mugler In a Can," in salute to the Supreme Court's iron
precedent of police power -- that the legislature has a legal duty to
prohibit individual liberty, to stop people from acting selfishly in
their own interest.

Doesn't matter what we call it. Names mean nothing. Club of Rome is just
a name. Al Gore is probably a collective hallucination; there actually
is no such person -- just an empty shell of a man, without purpose or
meaning or an original thought in his brain. He doesn't need any to be
ceremonial President of a country club, a charity, or a nation. All he
needs is a smile.

Imagine casting Al Gore as "Mr. Thompson" in a film version of Atlas
Shrugged. He has John Galt arrested for selfish, illegal use of natural
resources. What does Gore say to Galt? -- that the world is in a
terrible state of affairs, that people are starving, that schoolchildren
beg him to sacrifice his personal happiness for the greatest good of the
greatest number -- and (with a modest rewrite of the original dialogue):


Galt answers: "Fuck you."

As a de facto anarchist, I advocate and rely upon the Fuck You school of
political philosophy. It is important to me beyond measure, because the
right of an individual to exist for his own sake is paramount, not
merely as an issue of morality, but intrinsic to individual purpose. All
examples of personal purpose benefit the whole of society, whether these
may be innovators or serial killers.

Deprived of coercive power, beyond the fixture of one man's blood and
bone, an individual cannot do much harm. Put him in a legislature, you
multiply his wickedness by a thousand. Make him head of state and
nothing good is possible. To all tyrants, all parents, all churches and
dogmas, all cowards and comedians, all petty law-makers and law-keepers,
the right response is always "Fuck you." I owe nothing to no one.


Obedience Junkies


This is not an attitude or a choice. It is a fact. We live in perfect
liberty and government is a delusion, sustained by our refusal to say
"Fuck you." The impulse to compromise, to obey, to tolerate inane
pageantry and pretended obligation is a self-deceit, the wishfulness of
a child at play. Wave the flag if you must. Don't try tell me it means
something. It is a piece of cloth on a stick. It makes as much sense as
waving a washcloth on World Soap Day.

No doubt that's next. Al Gore proclaims July 4th World Soap Day, to
encourage everyone to wash their hands before handling food. In his
anti-selfish psyche, where the greatest delusion of the greatest number
is all that matters, there's nobody home in Al Gore's head to wonder if
it matters that, in reality, the Declaration of Independence was signed
on July 4th, proclaiming the inalienable liberty of individual men, free
by natural right.

-30-


from The Laissez Faire City Times, Vol 2, No 41, Dec. 7, 1998
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Laissez Faire City Times is a private newspaper. Although it is
published by a corporation domiciled within the sovereign domain of
Laissez Faire City, it is not an "official organ" of the city or its
founding trust. Just as the New York Times is unaffiliated with the city
of New York, the City Times is only one of what may be several news
publications located in, or domiciled at, Laissez Faire City proper. For
information about LFC, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Published by
Laissez Faire City Netcasting Group, Inc.
Copyright 1998 - Trademark Registered with LFC Public Registrar
All Rights Reserved
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to