-Caveat Lector- Forwarded Message: Subj: $4,600 congressional pay raise Date: 99-03-15 18:03:07 EST From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gary Ruskin) Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Multiple recipients of list CONG-REFORM) Congressional Reform Briefings March 15, 1999 To subscribe to Congressional Reform Briefings send the message: subscribe CONG-REFORM your name to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- House leadership wants Members of Congress to receive a $4,600 pay raise, which would boost congressional salaries to $141,300. -- Please contact your Members of Congress to oppose the congressional pay raise. The congressional switchboard phone number is (202) 224-3121. E-mail addresses of Members of Congress are available at: http://www.lib.umich.edu/libhome/Documents.center/congress/conemail.txt NEWS RELEASE For Immediate Release: For More Information Contact: Monday, March 15, 1999 Gary Ruskin (202) 296-2787 Diverse Groups Want Hastert, Gephardt to Reject Congressional Pay Raise Responding to news reports that House Speaker Dennis Hastert and Minority Leader Richard Gephardt support a $4,600 congressional pay raise, Ralph Nader said that "Speaker Hastert and Minority Leader Gephardt shouldn't take advantage of the taxpayers with yet another congressional pay grab. If anything, Congress deserves a pay cut." According to today's Roll Call, "Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) wants to hand Members bigger paychecks, but he's reluctant to make an aggressive, public push to raise the $136,700 annual salary...Minority Leader Richard Gephardt (D-Mo.) is equally supportive of the COLA...and equally adverse to assuming a prominent role in the debate." Members of Congress are already overpaid. They currently earn a $136,700 annual salary, plus generous pensions, perks, and other benefits. Top leadership earns more. The proposed congressional pay raise of 3.4%, or $4,600, would boost congressional salaries to $141,300 per year. Last year, Members of Congress gave themselves a $3,100 raise, effective January 1, 1998. "Members of Congress ought to strip the lard out of their budget -- by taking aim at congressional pay and perks -- instead of further indulging themselves at taxpayers expense," said Gary Ruskin, director of the Congressional Accountability Project. "What stronger proof that we have an unrepresentative Congress," said Paul Jacob, national director of U.S. Term Limits. "They work for the American people and the people are strongly opposed to another pay raise...so they plan to sneak this through." "Seems the less they do the more they need to be paid for it," said Russell Verney, chairman of the Reform Party. "This bi-partisan salary heist proves that Republicans and Democrats are perfectly capable of working together -- as long as they personally benefit from the deal. Americans are getting tired of politicians' claims that they are just 'serving' the public, when they're really just serving themselves," said Steve Dasbach, national director of the Libertarian Party. During the last ten years, House Members gave themselves five pay raises, Senators six. Congressional salaries grew by $47,200 -- more than $15,000 above inflation. In 1989, the base congressional salary was $89,500. Many Americans haven't been so fortunate. The median income for full-time, year-round male workers was higher in 1970 ($35,691) adjusted for inflation, than it was in 1997 ($35,248). That means many Americans haven't had a real wage increase in more than a generation. "If America didn't get a raise in nearly thirty years, then why should Congress keep giving itself raises?" Nader asked. "Members of Congress have voted themselves such luxurious salaries that they sympathize with the economic status of corporate and wealthy elites and forget about regular folks," Ruskin said. "That has concrete legislative implications. Any congressional pay raise would make the problem worse. Hastert and Gephardt should raise the minimum wage, not the congressional salary." Many Members of Congress receive large raises when they come to Congress. A 1996 Roll Call study found that "all but six of the 73 newly elected House Members will receive large pay hikes when they take office" compared with their previous employment. "Instead of boosting their salary, Congress should pass real campaign finance reform and ensure the ethics Committee impartially investigates allegations of corruption," Nader said. -30- -------------------------------------------------------- The following article is reprinted from the March 15, 1999 issue of Roll Call, available at <htttp://www.rollcall.com/>. Reprinted with permission. Hastert, Gephardt Want COLA Quiet Effort May Lead to Pay Raise For Members By Jim VandeHei Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) wants to hand Members bigger paychecks, buthe's reluctant to make an aggressive, public push to raise the $136,700 annual salary, according to leadership sources. Hastert's reticence illuminates the political sensitivity of pushing a pay hike when Congress' popularity numbers are in the tank, according to the leadership sources. It also portends another perilous debate over how much money Members should earn. Hastert spokesman John Feehery said the Speaker is for a "cost-of-living adjustment only," but has no proposal or plan to take a lead on the pay raise. Feehery had little interest in elaborating. Privately, Hastert would prefer as little attention as possible on the pay raise issue, leadership sources said. Minority Leader Richard Gephardt (D-Mo.) is equally supportive of the COLA, an adviser said, and equally adverse to assuming a prominent role in the debate. Gephardt has good reason to fret: then-Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) killed the pay raise last year after he felt Gephardt had leaked their private talks about a potential pay raise for political gain. "This is a Members' issue, and we won't talk about it," said one of Gephardt's top advisers. In past years, the two sides have considered pledges to not demagogue the issue or make the pay raise a campaign issue in order to comfort nervous Members. It's unclear if Hastert or Gephardt will go that far this Congress. The last COLA, in September 1997, gave Members a 2.3 percent hike, or $3,073. It was the first COLA for Members since 1993. Gary Ruskin of the Congressional Accountability Project said the reluctance of Hastert and Gephardt to push a COLA publicly shows that "they know Congressional pay raises are one of the most hated legislative acts by any Congress." "But they still stick their toe in the water and that's because so many Members are greedy,"charged Ruskin. "So, leadership has been doing this dance for a long time." Hastert and Gephardt are interested in giving Members a COLA, their advisers say, and would love to find a way to raise their pay without infuriating voters back home. In past interviews, Hastert has said Members are piling up debts as they try to maintain two households and put their children through school. Regardless of his reluctance to discuss the topic, the pay raise issue is unlikely to surface with force until later this summer, when Members start work on the annual spending bills. A COLA for lawmakers is automatically built into law. Therefore, to deny Members a pay boost, an amendment must be offered to the Treasury, Postal Service and government operations spending bill to strip the COLA from the legislation. It's unclear if any Member will offer such an amendment, but, if one does, it likely would spell doom for the COLA. "We need to do this quietly or not at all," said one leadership source. Rep. Phil English (R-Pa.) is a likely candidate to take a stand against a COLA without a vote. He recently introduced legislation that would remove the automatic nature of the COLA. The legislation would reverse the current procedure by requiring Members to hold a recorded vote before handing themselves an annual COLA. "The fact remains that the public is very uncomfortable with the notion that we allow ourselves a sneaky automatic cost-of-living adjustment unless we step in and veto it,"English told Roll Call early last week. While English's legislation is not expected to pass, sources said it could catapult him to the center of the debate when the issue heats up this summer. English was not available for comment on Friday. The third-term Congressman has also introduced a bill that would reduce the special tax deduction Members are allowed for maintaining two residences from $3,000 to just $1. While Members complain that $136,700 per year is not enough money, it's substantially more than the $89,500 they earned prior to the 1989 Ethics Reform Act. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Congressional Accountability Project is a congressional watchdog group affiliated with Ralph Nader. For more information about congressional pay and perks, or the Congressional Accountability Project, see http://www.essential.org/orgs/CAP/CAP.html or send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to Congressional Reform Briefings send the message: subscribe CONG-REFORM your name to [EMAIL PROTECTED] DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
