The Trilateral Commission -- A Council on Foreign Relations Front Organization
Monday, March 15, 1999, an AP article titled "Trilateral Commission
reaches out to others," was published on the Tampa Bay Tribune website. The
article is about the Council on Foreign Relations -- the real story is
hidden between the lines.
The Trilateral Commission is a Council on Foreign Relations front
organization, established to influence American foreign policy, and
facilitate Council on Foreign Relations expansion into Europe, Canada and
Japan. The Council on Foreign Relations uses front organizations to protect
it from connection to illegalities that could lead to a Congressional
investigation.
Recent economic upheavals in the Far East and Russia have made them ripe
for Council on Foreign Relations expansion. Chinese, Korean, Russian, and
Ukrainian movers and shakers were invited to the Trilateral Commission
meeting to participate in "discussion-groups." The material generated will
be used to prepare propaganda designed to influence United States national
policy makers to support foreign policy favorable to Council on Foreign
Relations controlled corporate expansion into those nations, and manipulate
United States public opinion to favor those policies.
The Trilateral Commission was not the first front organization used to
cover-up Council on Foreign Relations manipulation of U.S. foreign policy
concerning Russia and the Far East. In 1951 a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee
on Internal Security, known as the McCarren Committee, investigated
another Council on Foreign Relations front organization, the American
Institute of Pacific Relations, for its role in controlling and
coordinating actions favorable to the Soviet Union, the expansion of
international communism, and the loss of China to the Communists.
The Council on Foreign Relations established the American Institute of
Pacific Relations in 1925. Morgan and Rockefeller controlled Wall Street
interests, foundations , and corporations closely allied to them (including
Standard Oil, International Telephone and Telegraph, and Chase National
Bank) provided the funding. The Institute influenced United States policy
towards Russia, China, and Japan, and helped establish Council on Foreign
Relations controlled corporations in these areas.
The McCarren Committee never investigated the Council on Foreign Relations.
The investigation created a battle between the "Left" and the "Right" over
communism, that still serves to confuse Americans to this day, and divert
attention from the organization responsible for the problems-- the Council
on Foreign Relations.
The article quotes Paul Volcker. The article tells us the Trilateral
Commission was founded by David Rockefeller. The article doesn't mention
Volcker and Rockefeller are Council on Foreign Relations members. Or, that
Council on Foreign Relations members Zbigniew Brzezinski, and Jimmy Carter
helped Rockefeller found the Trilateral Commission.
The article tells us, "The commission, founded 26 years ago by banker David
Rockefeller, includes more than 300 mostly private citizens from the United
States, Canada, Europe and Japan." The article warps the truth by failing
to mention that over 90% of the members are American citizens that belong
to the Council on Foreign Relations.
Council membership is by invitation only, and restricted to American
citizens. The Trilateral Commission is an inner circle of Council on
Foreign Relations members.
The RoundTable website contains a 1992 list of Trilateral Commission
members [ http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/2807/CFRTClist.html ] . It
contains 337 names, 316 are found on various Council on Foreign Relations
(1992,1990,1988,1987,1985,and 1984) membership lists. The other 21 people
are either Americans not found on these Council on Foreign Relations
rosters, or are European and Japanese members.
The Council on Foreign Relations operates by influencing public opinion.
Well planned psycho-political operations are focused at influential
decision makers. The operations manipulate decision makers to influence
national policy to maximize Council member controlled industry profits.
Council member controlled medicine, munitions, media, banking, energy, and
food industries profit most during periods of unrest and war.
The current plan to bomb Serbia, is the latest example of this sort of
Council on Foreign Relations psycho-political operation. On March 18th,
Council on Foreign Relations member Madeleine Albright announced, "..if
Belgrade doesn't reverse course the Serbs alone will be responsible for the
consequences and I would like to remind President Milosevic that NATO
stands ready to take whatever measures are necessary." As we all know, in
Council on Foreign Relations members Albright and Clinton's book that means
bombing the Serbs. Increasingly, it appears, key members of Congress are
beginning to suspect that they have been lied to by the Clinton White House
and are showing signs of real concern that the entire nation is about to
become perpetrators of an attack upon a sovereign nation that could involve
not peacekeeping but guerrilla warfare. Council on Foreign Relation member
Clinton's Whitehouse contains 300 or more Council on Foreign Relations
members he appointed to the CIA, NSC, State Department, and other agencies.
Whose orchestrating the lying, Albright, Clinton, the Clinton Whitehouse,
or the Council on Foreign Relations?
The psycho-political operations are developed through "discussion-groups."
Council members attending the "discussion-groups" study different policy
issues exploring and presenting divergent views. The discussion is recorded
and a digest of the discussion is produced. The material is used to create
news articles and essays designed to appeal to well targeted influential
decision makers in diplomacy and international relations. The Council on
Foreign Relations member controlled media industry broadcasts the
propaganda. "Discussion-group" sessions are closed to news coverage, but
are attended by Council on Foreign Relations members who are prominent
news and media figures. Security is usually tight, keeping the general
public and news media out of the discussion, and identifying,
photographing, adding as many "outsiders" as possible who do show up, to
a list of potential "security" threats.
Any connections to the Council on Foreign Relations are edited out of the
"news." Council on Foreign Relations success is largely due to keeping its
identity a secret. Adopting an organization of overlapping circles helps
them do this. The Trilateral Commission is one inner circle of Council on
Foreign Relations members used to extend its influence abroad and to act as
a cover to protect it from the scrutiny of a congressional investigation.
The Council on Foreign Relations evolved from the Institute of
International Affairs. British and American branches of the Institute of
International Affairs were established on May 30, 1919, at a meeting in
the Hotel Majestic in Paris, by American and British Paris Peace
Conference delegates who belonged to the American and British branches of a
secret-organization founded by Cecil Rhodes.
"Discussion-groups" were a Rhodes' Secret-Society instrument developed and
used to influence public opinion. The Institutes of International Affairs
adopted their use. "Study-Groups" are formalized "discussion-groups" used
by the Council on Foreign Relations and its branch organizations in other
nations; Council controlled think tanks such as, Rand, Brookings,
Council for Strategic International Studies, and the John Hopkins Nitze
School of Advanced International Studies; and, Council controlled
governmental agencies like. the Central Intelligence Agency, and the State
Department. The meetings are limited to a small group experts. Tight
security is provided. Discussions and material generated are often
classified. The material is used to produce classified reports and digests
meant to influence select groups of high-ranking public officials, as well
as articles, essays and stories meant to influence the public to accept
the proposed national policy decisions.
By 1936 Institutes of International Affairs were established in Canada,
Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, India, and Newfoundland. Each
Institute , under the guise of world peace, concentrated on influencing
national-policy to achieve unity of all nations under one world
government. By controlling public opinion tension is created between
nations wary of losing their national identity, mores, and cultures,
resulting in a state of perpetual warfare used to justify peace-time
National Security Emergency measures and large military budgets. The groups
goal was to maximize Institute member industry profits by selling both guns
and butter. Could the reason famous economist John Kenneth Galbraith has
never written a book exposing the Council on Foreign Relations effect on
the economy because Galbraith , is a Council on Foreign Relations member?
In 1918 a group of international lawyers and high-ranking officers of
banking, manufacturing, trading and financing companies, headed by
Theodore Roosevelt's Secretary of State Elihu Root, founded the Council on
Foreign Relations. Its purpose was to promote commerce through contact with
distinguished foreign visitors. After returning from the Paris Peace
conference the American Institute of International Affairs approached the
Council on Foreign Relations and proposed a merger. On July 29, 1921, the
American Institute of International Affairs merged with the Council on
Foreign Relations adopting their name. The new Council on Foreign Relations
adopted the American Institute of International Affairs policy -- unity of
all nations under one world government.
In 1925 ten independent national councils holding territory in the Pacific
Area were created to extend the influence of the Royal Institute of
International Affairs and Council on Foreign Relations into Russia and the
Far East. Institutes of Pacific Relations were established in an
interlocking fashion with four existing Institutes of International Affairs
(Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand) and the Council on Foreign
Relations in the United States. Institutes of Pacific Relations were
established in five additional countries 1. China, 2. Japan, 3. France, 4.
the Netherlands, 5. the Soviet Union. By 1939 the Institutes of Pacific
Relations in the four British areas had merged with the local Institutes of
International affairs. The American Institute of Pacific Relations remained
a Council on Foreign Relations front organization until it was eventually
dissolved after the McCarren Committee investigation in 1951. The
Institutes of Pacific Relations held joint meetings every two years.
The Pacific Council was a seven member Institute of Pacific Relations inner
circle set up in 1927. Members of the four Commonwealth Institutes of
Pacific Relations (Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand) also belonged
to the Institute of International Affairs.
The other three members belonged to the Chinese, Japanese, and American
Institutes of Pacific Relations. Greene had attended the Paris Peace
Conference, and after the conference was one of the early figures in the
establishment of the Council on Foreign Relations. The Pacific Council
planned and coordinated psycho-political operations designed to achieve the
unity of all nations under one world government. One operation focused on
extending the organizations influence and control throughout the League of
Nations.
The annual Trilateral Commission meeting in Washington DC, is nothing more
than a Council on Foreign Relations discussion group. Influential European,
Canadian, and Japanese citizens were invited to join the Trilateral
Commission so that they could help shape United States Foreign policy and
participate in the profits of Council on Foreign Relations controlled
Companies in their nations. Now, the Trilateral Commission is inviting
Chinese, Korean, Russian, and Ukrainian movers and shakers to join in
discussions that will be used to create psycho-political operations to
influence United States Foreign policy allowing the Council on Foreign
Relations to establish and control corporations is their countries.
If any wrong-doings resulting from the psycho-political operations are
discovered Congress will focus their investigation on the Trilateral
Commission and not the Council on Foreign Relations.If such an
investigation does take place, you will find, as in past congressional
investigations, such as the Rockefeller Commission , the Church Committee,
the Warren Commission, and the Tower Commission, that many of the
Congressional investigators are members of the Council on Foreign
Relations.
When the investigators, and those investigated, are closely connected, and
the investigators don't disqualify themselves because of prejudice or
personal interest, hasn't a crime called conspiracy to obstruct justice
been committed? If the investigators are high-ranking public officials
aren't the crimes high crimes, that call for impeachment and trial before
Congress? Have you requested your elected representatives to call for a
Congressional investigation of the Council on Foreign Relations?
FYI: Can any of you speak Greek? A friend sent a link to a website about
Athanasios Strigas. The website seems to be a work in progress. The website
says," Athanasios Strigas is an agent of NATO and the Trilateral Commission
and has written more than 8 big books about the Trilateral Commission and
the politics in general...His books are written in Hellenic and are related
mainly to the connection and the involvement of the Bilderberg Club in the
Hellenic politics and political events (Turkish invasion in Cyprus,Military
junta etc.). Nevertheless they give very much information on the Trilateral
Commission,Bilderberg Club,NSA,NATO and the secret agencies." The website
contains Library of Congress listings of Strigas's books. The website is at
[http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/8604/strigas.zip].
The AP article, modified to identify, Council on Foreign Relations members
follows:
>
>Trilateral Commission reaches out to others
>
>
> WASHINGTON (AP) - The Trilateral Commission, long an exclusive club of
>influential citizens from the world's most powerful nations, is reaching
>out to other countries to help find ways to foster democracy and economic
>freedom.
>
>While leading figures from nonmember countries like China, Korea, Russia
>and Ukraine cannot become members of the commission, which meets annually
>to discuss the future of the world, they sat at the table for this year's
>meetings in Washington, which ended Monday.
>
>``We have taken steps importantly to extend the range of the discussion
>... to people outside the traditional trilateral areas,'' said former
>[COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS MEMBER ] Federal Reserve Chairman Paul
>Volcker, leader of the U.S. contingent in one of the world's most
>prestigious gatherings. The commission, founded 26 years ago by banker
>[COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS MEMBER ]David Rockefeller, includes more
>than 300 mostly private citizens from the United States, Canada, Europe
>and Japan.
>
> [COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS MEMBER ] Volcker, at a closing news
>conference that attracted only a handful of journalists, said three days
>of discussions that involved about half the council's membership reached
>no conclusions. Sessions are closed to news coverage, although security is
>not tight and some media figures belong to the commission.
>
>Membership includes academics and industrial and former political leaders.
>Current members of national governments are excluded.
>
>``The Trilateral Commission doesn't make any recommendations on
>anything,'' Volcker said - particularly not on reform of exchange rates or
>the world financial system, which were among topics briefly discussed at
>the meeting.
>
>Otto Graf Lambsdorff, European chairman and former German Bundestag
>member, said China was the focus of much discussion, again with no
>consensus reached. He said, however, that no one opposed cooperation with
>China and no one said China should not respect human rights.
>
> [COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS MEMBER ]Volcker said the participation of
>representatives from several nonmember countries enhanced the discussions
>and will continue at future annual sessions, held alternatively in the
>United States, Japan and Europe.
>
>``You have the opportunity of changing thinking,'' said [COUNCIL ON
>FOREIGN RELATIONS MEMBER ] Volcker, assessing the value of the meetings.
>``I would hope that there is some kind of changing in thinking, a
>convergence of thought, because people are affected by the discussions,
>but it's not directed deliberately towards a particular end, other than
>the fostering of democracy and economic development around the world.''
>
>The Japanese commission chairman, Yotaro Kobayashi, head of Fuji Xerox
>Co., Ltd., said, ``Having more participants from outside ... has only
>enriched the course of the discussions.''
>
>
>
> Copyright 1999 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may
>not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
###
roundtable
_____
Visit the Roundtable Web Page: http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/2807
Title-50 War and National Defense � 783 states - "It shall be unlawful for
any person knowingly to combine, conspire, or agree with any other person
to perform any act which would substantially contribute to the
establishment within the United States of a totalitarian dictatorship, the
direction and control of which is to be vested in, or exercised by or under
the domination of control of, any foreign government."
The Council on Foreign Relations are in violation of Title-50 War and
National Defense � 783. The Council on Foreign Relations has unlawfully
and knowingly combined, conspired, and agreed to substantially contribute
to the establishment of one world order under the totalitarian
dictatorship, the direction and the control of members of Council on
Foreign Relations, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, and
members of their branch organizations in various nations throughout the
world. That is totalitarianism on a global scale.
____
Visit the Roundtable Web Page: http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/2807
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What two Council on Foreign Relations members edited the English
Translation of Mein Kampf? See "The Council on Foreign Relations & Mein
Kampf" [ http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/2807/emhitler.html }
